Green Room

Sharon Bialek’s Fiancé Belatedly Remembers He’s Not Her Fiancé

posted at 10:56 am on November 12, 2011 by

Things that make you go “hmmmm.”

A northwest suburban man says he needs to clear the air after coming to the support of his fiancee, who accuses GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain of making a sexual play for her.
For starters, Sharon Bialek isn’t his fiancee, said Mark Harwood in an exclusive interview on Wednesday night.
“We were engaged last year in June but I think there have been some assumptions that Sharon still lives here in Mundelein with me” Harwood told the I-Team. “Sharon and her son moved out in February of this year and now live in their own home … so effectively we’re no longer engaged.”
On Monday, when Ms. Bialek was the first of Cain’s alleged groping victim’s to go public, Harwood was contacted by news organizations trying to find out information about her. He did numerous interviews during which he was referred to as her fiancé. “I made reference to the fact that we were engaged and got engaged last June, 2010 and I think the assumption then-we were still engaged. I think most people seemed to be under the belief that Sharon lived [in my house] but she’s not here.”

Here’s video of the interview:

I don’t know if this has any particular significance, but for several days the media wanted the world to think Sharon Bialek was engaged to this guy, because that seemed to undercut suggestions she might be in it for money, e.g., Ben Smith at Politico:

In fact, per the Tribune, she’s living with her fiance, described as an executive in the medical equipment industry, in “a large, five-bedroom home… in north suburban Mundelein.”

He was described as her fiancé in the lead of an Associated Press article citing him as corroboration of Bialek’s account (although he didn’t know her in 1997 and says she never told him about it until Nov. 4). It was Thursday before WLS-TV got this interview, so that little bit of misinformation got corrected by the local ABC station in Chicago, three crucial days after it had been widely reported and woven into the media narrative as evidence of Bialek’s credibility.

Like I said: Things that make you go “hmmmm.”

(Cross-posted at The Other McCain.)

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Gold digging wench.

AH_C on November 12, 2011 at 11:28 AM

I’m not going “Hmmmm”, but I am saying “Told ya so”. Another nail in the coffin for Karl Rove, George Will, David Frum, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, et.al.

SouthernGent on November 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM

So will this go mainstream in an effort to restore Mr. Cain’s credibility?? I doubt it.

kringeesmom on November 12, 2011 at 1:19 PM

Is this going to stay hidden in the dark of the Green Room or will it see daylight on the main page for all to see?

Knucklehead on November 12, 2011 at 1:28 PM

for several days the media wanted the world to think Sharon Bialek was engaged to this guy, because that seemed to undercut suggestions she might be in it for money

.
Isn’t there a kind of deception known as “lying by omission?” Yes, I think there is and it most effective when you get buffoons to react to assertions and allegations without knowing all the facts before their “public consumption statements.”
.
You know who does this kind of lying frequently? Politicians and media do it, especially media that is “in the tank” for a particular party or candidate. The media that do this are scum.

ExpressoBold on November 12, 2011 at 3:04 PM

How reliable is this guy? Is he current on his property taxes? And what is the controlling authority for verifying fiance-hood?

Shouldn’t Cain come clean on what he knows about this guy’s relationship to Bialek?

J.E. Dyer on November 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM

So, she is in it for the money after all.

Kissmygrits on November 12, 2011 at 4:30 PM

If you lie before a camera, there is no consequence. If you lie in court, they can throw you in jail. Guess which setting people who want to smear you choose.

AnotherOpinion on November 12, 2011 at 7:38 PM

Ha. I knew this ‘fiance’ claim was nonsense. First was the length of the so-called engagement. Who gets “engaged” at their age and isn’t married within a year of the engagement? What would they be waiting for? Second was the fact that she contacted both her ex-boyfriend and Gloria Allred and didn’t confide this with her “fiance’ beforehand.

I’m not going “Hmmmm”, but I am saying “Told ya so”. Another nail in the coffin for Karl Rove, George Will, David Frum, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, et.al.
SouthernGent on November 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM

Why? Because Bialek and her associates are unreliable producers of fact (at best) and grifters (at worse) does not absolve Cain from mishandling this entire episode. Don’t shoot the messenger(s) and all that.

Buy Danish on November 13, 2011 at 2:33 PM

Why? Because Bialek and her associates are unreliable producers of fact (at best) and grifters (at worse) does not absolve Cain from mishandling this entire episode. Don’t shoot the messenger(s) and all that.

Buy Danish on November 13, 2011 at 2:33 PM

“Mishandling a presidential campaign” isn’t an actionable tort. We ought to be able to get back to criticizing Cain on the basis of his policy and poor campaigning skills, neh?

gryphon202 on November 14, 2011 at 12:14 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Helping others without the government.

Top Pick

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…