CA high school crowns first lesbian homecoming ‘king’

posted at 3:46 pm on November 4, 2011 by
[ Political Correctness ]   

“I now pronounce you… er—I dunno. What should I pronounce you?”

A story out of sunny California has left me wondering whether that scenario or ones like it have played out in zip codes like my own, where gay marriage is now the law of the land.

Homosexuals want to be treated equally in the world of couples—that much I get. Where the confusion sets in is when a lesbian is anointed her high school’s homecoming king.

The Blaze reports that Rebeca Arellano, a senior at Patrick Henry High School in San Diego, and her girlfriend Haileigh Adams “could be the first lesbian homecoming royal couple in the country if Adams—one of two female students nominated for homecoming queen—is crowned as well.”

(For fans of equal opportunity oddity, the article also supplies word that Francis Shervinski, a freshman at Columbia College in Chicago, was crowned his school’s “homecoming queen” several months back.)

A video clip from the ABC News affiliate in San Diego includes well-wishing occupants of a passing car shouting at Arellano and Adams, “You guys are an amazing couple!” (That one—the generic usage of guys to refer to individuals of either sex and even inanimate objects—I understand.)

The problem here is one of forcing an agenda, which is not how positive and constructive social change is affected. Gay advocates could say—probably have said—that events like this coronation advance the cause of gay rights in the same way that Rosa Parks’ refusal to vacate her seat on a bus advanced the cause of civil rights. Nothing could be further from the truth. The crowning of a female as “king” or a male as “queen” (putting aside the historical connotations of the second term) is a deliberate obfuscation of gender (a term I am using here in its sole grammatical sense) in the interests of cuteness. Those who support it would claim it is “opening eyes”—but I would say, if so to what?

Should we be looking forward to a time when Arellano and Adams marry and become Mr. and Mrs. Rebeca Arellano? What is achieved by the confusion resulting from that sort of convention? Natural human language is hard-wired to avoid ambiguity wherever possible. Circumventing that tendency is a way of building walls, not tearing them down.

While many applaud the strides that the gay community has made in recent years, there are at least as many who do not and who, moreover, don’t feel comfortable with these changes. Some cite religious reasons for their discomfiture. To call these people barbaric or homophobic (which I still insist means “afraid of being the same”) is a demonstration of the worst kind of intolerance coming from a group that seeks tolerance in others.

As has been written about repeatedly in this space, the views of gay advocates and of the people who oppose their lifestyle are both protected by the First Amendment. Neither side has a prior claim to constitutional protections. If gays want to win over hearts and minds, they need to exercise patience and diligence. They would also be well counseled to avoid cutesy stunts.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

 

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I will never accept or embrace this as being “normal.” Never. And I don’t care what names those people and their enablers call me.

pdigaudio on November 4, 2011 at 3:55 PM

They would also be well counseled to avoid cutesy stunts.

OK, but what if they’re…FABULOUS!!!!

catmman on November 4, 2011 at 4:09 PM

Yeah! We are so proud that you have sex with one another!

That is awesome! It is just wondrous that you are attracted to each other sexually end are the same sex!

WOW!

You two are freakin’ HERO’S!

Opposite Day on November 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM

Quick – be outrageously outraged!

Dance, puppets, dance.

Jeddite on November 4, 2011 at 4:35 PM

The problem here is one of forcing an agenda, which is not how positive and constructive social change is affected.

Students vote on these dumb titles? Right? Unless I am missing something it was the student body that decided this rather than some imposition by a court or the school admin.

lexhamfox on November 4, 2011 at 5:58 PM

Students vote on these dumb titles? Right?

Right. They will also be the ones arguing the most loudly when they are called names and treated badly. The “innocence” card just doesn’t work here.

Howard Portnoy on November 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM

Yeah! We are so proud that you have sex with one another!

But isn’t it great that these two girls are still technically virgins?

Pervygrin on November 4, 2011 at 6:24 PM

Well, I guess as long as they’re not letting the lesbians play strength or speed positions on the football team.

I mean, even high-school kids have to have some standards.

J.E. Dyer on November 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM

Yeah! We are so proud that you have sex with one another!

I guess you assume that every teen couple, straight AND gay, have sex, and get outraged every time you see a couple of either orientation on stage together?

That is awesome! It is just wondrous that you are attracted to each other sexually end are the same sex!

Opposite Day on November 4, 2011 at 4:27 PM

Amazing that you only get outraged when they’re gay and announcing to the world that they’re attracted to each other sexually.

MadisonConservative on November 4, 2011 at 7:03 PM

I think you’ve got the right of it, Howard. A woman is still a woman, no matter which way she swings. And a female monarch is called a queen, not a king, no matter who is rolling in the royal hay with her. So calling a girl “king” of anything is just silly.

Mary in LA on November 4, 2011 at 7:14 PM

Meant to add: The student body should have voted the pair in as co-queens, if that was what they (the students) wanted to do.

Mary in LA on November 4, 2011 at 7:16 PM

Well, I guess as long as they’re not letting the lesbians play strength or speed positions on the football team.

I mean, even high-school kids have to have some standards.

J.E. Dyer on November 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM

A college friend of mine played for a while in a women’s football league. It’s not about your orientation, it’s about your size. :-) (My friend was and is a big gal — not fat, just big.)

Mary in LA on November 4, 2011 at 7:18 PM

I thought “queens” were men??!?
Gay men lose out to gay women….

cane_loader on November 4, 2011 at 7:29 PM

This reminds me of high school where the students voted for a kid in a wheelchair who had a bone disease and was about 3 feet tall. He wasn’t really THAT well known but he had the advantage of NOT being one of the “beautiful people” and that made all the insecure and bleeding hearts that exist in every high school become determined to vote for him.

I would put these many gay homecoming choices in the same category. These are students who more than anything want to deny the crown to the cheerleader or the football captain out of a pure sense of envy or jealousy. It is the same infection we are seeing now in our politics. We need revenge against the successful because they enjoy WAY too many of life’s pleasures and they need to be “redistributed”.

Conan on November 4, 2011 at 7:49 PM

The way “homosexuals” choose a life of bachelorhood/spinsterhood in order to focus on same sex relationships is, well, just dumb.

Count to 10 on November 4, 2011 at 8:40 PM

School I work at does the decent thing. They vote in special ed kids almost every year. This year an autistic kid got it. We have good students, not these sickos.

Vegi on November 4, 2011 at 11:41 PM

>>If gays want to win over hearts and minds, they need to exercise patience and diligence.

The Stonewall Riots were back in 1969. Smaller resistances to police harassment were ten years before that. It’s been half a century. How patient is patient enough?

kc-anathema on November 5, 2011 at 3:52 AM

Students vote on these dumb titles? Right?

Right. They will also be the ones arguing the most loudly when they are called names and treated badly. The “innocence” card just doesn’t work here.

Howard Portnoy on November 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM

I don’t see how this forces anything on anyone. This particular institution is pretty gay start out with. If this sort of thing forces some people to be abusive or violent it is not the victim’s fault.

lexhamfox on November 5, 2011 at 8:09 AM

The Stonewall Riots were back in 1969. Smaller resistances to police harassment were ten years before that. It’s been half a century. How patient is patient enough?

As I note in the article, they have made strides since then. These pointless “in-your-face” actions only set them back.

Howard Portnoy on November 5, 2011 at 10:23 AM

It’s not about your orientation, it’s about your size.

Mary in LA on November 4, 2011 at 7:18 PM

I’m afraid in men’s football, it’s about your biological sex. Even the biggest, strongest women can’t play with the men. Not if a team wants to win games, at any rate.

J.E. Dyer on November 5, 2011 at 3:02 PM

How about women stay queens and men kings? Why is this even a gay issue? Aren’t they trying to break the stereotype that gender is defined by sexual attraction?

Esthier on November 6, 2011 at 9:21 AM

The Stonewall Riots were back in 1969. Smaller resistances to police harassment were ten years before that. It’s been half a century. How patient is patient enough?

kc-anathema on November 5, 2011 at 3:52 AM

And what, nothing has improved?

Esthier on November 6, 2011 at 9:22 AM

The struggle against reality continues.

TexasDan on November 7, 2011 at 6:24 PM