Are Americans unwittingly aiding and abetting the government in its quest to control our lives?

posted at 12:30 pm on October 5, 2011 by
[ Moonbats ]   

You have probably read by now that Denmark has introduced a fat tax. The ambiguity in that sentence is deliberate. The tax will be levied on all foods with a saturated fat content above 2.3%. The assessment is 16 Danish kroner per kilogram of saturated fat, which  works out to about $6.27 per pound—a pretty hefty amount.

Now that the international Food Police have established a beachhead, concerns are being voiced elsewhere, including here at home. Could the U.S be next? During the U.N. General Assembly summit on non-communicable diseases—a discussion that included diet and eating habits—renowned medical researcher and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg opined that

governments at all levels must make healthy solutions the default social option. That is ultimately government’s highest duty.

Well, there you have it—and from the man who claimed a few years ago that global warming is the biggest threat that humans face.

Bloomberg’s wish to make government the ultimate arbiter of what its “subjects” eat is nothing new. He has long been an advocate of taking the salt shaker out of the hands of American eaters. Nor is he alone in his effort to expand the reach of the nanny state. Under the watchful eye of First Lady Michelle Obama (who shares the mayor’s medical training), thegovernment has attempted to crack down on pernicious food advertising.

It has long been the position of this commentator that the American people need to take responsibility for their own health, a first step toward which is self-education. Yet, a story that appears in today’s New York Post suggests that perhaps Joe and Josephine Public are not quite up to that daunting task.

The story chronicles the rise in public fear of gluten, which appears to be on the verge of becoming the next MSG. (Briefly, for those who missed the MSG scare, a medical researcher from China working in the U.S. experienced a negative reaction to Chinese food prepared in American restaurants. In 1968, he wrote a letter The New England Journal of Medicine in which he theorized that monosodium glutamate, or MSG, might be the culprit. Despite research over the next several decades demonstrating that no statistical correlation could be drawn between MSG and “Chinese restaurant syndrome,” as the phenomenon came to be called, the myth endures to this day).

And now it has company. Meet the gluten hoax. As the Postreports, gluten-free diets are on the rise, and so are gluten-free menu options in restaurants all over the nation.

This is not to make light of celiac disease—an autoimmune disorder triggered by gluten, the protein found in grains—or of the roughly 1 percent of the population afflicted with it. But as the article notes:

[A]n increasing number of [consumers] who don’t have a medical excuse to ditch gluten are also declaring it public enemy No. 1. These days, you can’t throw a bread roll without hitting someone who has cut gluten out of their [sic] diet for health or diet reasons.

The writers quotes Zagat Survey co-chair Nina Zagat, who added a gluten-free category to the company’s guidebook because of consumer demand, as saying:

It’s a major issue. I’ve heard anecdotally that some people are eating gluten-free because they think it may be healthier in general.

It is not. Gluten is the “ingredient” that gives rustic breads their chewy quality. If you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac, there is no reason for you to deny yourself that simple pleasure. Unless of course you have convinced yourself that eating grain makes you sick.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

 

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Yes…we are PAYING for it!

golfmann on October 5, 2011 at 12:50 PM

Here is another article about how the courts/feds is getting in every aspect of our lives! Somehow we have got to un-do all this?

http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/wisconsin-judge-rules-no-right-to-own-a-cow-or-drink-its-milk/
L

letget on October 5, 2011 at 12:57 PM

I’ve had one “libertarian” here tell me in so many words that he is “willing to accept a certain level of tyranny” in the name of government protecting us. That doesn’t sound very “unwitting” to me.

gryphon202 on October 5, 2011 at 1:26 PM

gryphon: A ‘Libertarian’ said that?

Sounds like someone who thinks he knows (and actually doesn’t know) libertarianism.

Scott H on October 5, 2011 at 1:37 PM

Yes, we absolutely aid and abet the guvmint in controlling our lives, by buying into every allegation and accusation that comes down the pike.

The gluten terror is one of many. They’re all over the place; our good buddy ernesto was obediently retailing the canard about Rick Perry wanting to slaughter farm workers because back in the late 1990s, he opposed the junk science that said being in the fields when pesticides were sprayed on adjacent fields was killing them. (Hilariously, the MSM reports on this holocaust were usually illustrated with a photo of a guy walking through a vegetable field spraying the crop.)

The truth about this business (Michael Fumento did superb work ferreting it out) was that no health organization ever saw any reason to declare the pesticides in question unsafe. Lifetime exposure, even for a farm worker, was simply insufficient for a carcinogenic effect. The EPA itself found in the late ’90s — during the Clinton administration, in other words — that the pesticides were not carcinogens that required suppression or sequestering from humans.

Indeed, the pesticides had in general been in use since the 1970s, and farm workers had had plenty of time to be dropping like flies from exposure to them, and choosing other lines of work because of the terrible decimation of their ranks. But they weren’t doing either.

The whole thing was a scare concocted and sold to an ignorant public by activists who don’t want the human race using ANY pesticides. Every time we buy into something like this, we are buying into a job-creation and rent-seeking scheme for activists, and making everything else we do in life cost more. It’s an endless upward spiral that will only stop when we build up some wisdom, judgment, and immunity to cheap allegation-mongering.

J.E. Dyer on October 5, 2011 at 2:02 PM