A memo to Europe on idled resources and the opportunity in meltdown
posted at 12:16 pm on September 26, 2011 by J.E. Dyer
[ Economics ]
Mark Steyn wrote over the weekend about the meltdown of the Eurozone and the impending “end of the world as we know it.” Although it’s football season, and there’s plenty of fun stuff to do, it’s worth taking the time to point out some things about this global collapse deal, one more time.
First, the collapse of the Eurozone, which does look likely to happen, is the death of a Big Idea. It represents more than the collapse of a common currency. It’s the death of an idea of human life, regulated and directed and comprehensively administered by the state. The collapse represents a triumph of reality over hallucination. You can’t, in fact, build a sustainable model for having the state organize most of the investing for the people, and use its resulting power to tell the people what they are allowed to think and say, how much electricity they can use, and what medical services they will be allowed to have recourse to.
It is impossible to maintain a sound currency – much less a sound fiscal policy – when that’s your going-in proposition. And it’s good news that we are reaching the breaking point. The collapse of the Eurozone means Europeans cannot keep doing what they have been doing. They will have to do something else.
There are millions of people in Europe who will all still be there the day after the official collapse, however that ends up being marked. The collapse represents a gigantic opportunity for them, if they will take it. Each nation already has a mechanism for choosing new representatives, people with different ideas, to govern it. I am not convinced that there is no one left in Europe who has the discipline and character to chart a new course, instead of collapsing in the gutter, whimpering. There is a colossal infrastructure in Europe, and what it needs is not solicitude and life support but a release of the clamps in which it is immobilized by the 20th-century “European idea.”
America is not that far behind Europe. We have deceived ourselves that we don’t intend to end up overregulated and overspent like Europe, but the Obama presidency has demonstrated with disastrous clarity just how vulnerable we already were – had already made ourselves, long before January 2009 – to Sudden Overregulation and Sudden Overspending. If we are to recover, politically and economically – not to mention spiritually – this cannot stand. We, too, like the Europeans, have to do something else.
At the heart of the European idea is ratcheting up the “civilization premium”: the extra that it costs us to earn our bread and lodging in a complex society, as opposed to foraging for nuts and berries while we wait to be eaten by the local wildlife.
In many ways, civilization and complexity make things more efficient for us. But paying for civilization pulls against that effect in a perpetual dynamic. And the very purpose of the Euro-nanny-state is to add a growing premium to every unit of work effort or purchasing power, in order to pay for civilizational goals.
It has been a long time since anyone in Europe, or in the rest of the modern, post-industrial world, has worked almost entirely to pay for his own needs. The most productive are working at least 4 out of 12 months to pay the civilization premium levied directly by the state through taxes. We then work some months after that to pay the premium imposed indirectly by regulation.
Obviously, we have to pay for police and fire services. We want to; those services create a stable environment for family life, property, and business. But paying government regulators to withhold water from us, terminate oil-and-gas drilling, and maintain a system of litigation in which we can be made to pay rent to others for exhaling, doesn’t do that. It doesn’t enhance our well-being or economic prospects; it merely makes the necessities of life cost more. It makes us work harder to pay for the same things. Very often, that’s not worth it to us, and one of the costs of civilization becomes a systematic discouragement of our efforts at the margin.
Today, America and Europe are drifting on a sea of resources idled artificially by government policy. To begin with, we have a combined population that is less well-educated than its ancestors. That is a huge idled resource. The same population operates increasingly on a mental attitude of entitlement and resentment, and that idles it further. Both of these conditions were created by the implementation of the European idea in the public schools. Our people – the ones walking around right now – would be much more productive without these handicaps.
To me, this is the most important idled resource, but it cannot be unleashed without removing the clamps of regulation and taxation. Regulation has taken the place of taxation as the worst imposition on our daily economic life. It is a silent, mostly invisible killer. I would like to see the American capital gains tax rolled back, but it’s not our capital gains tax that is destroying our economy, it’s regulation.
Don’t forget the words idled resources. I’m not talking here solely about capital available for investment, although I’m talking about that too. I’m talking about how much more you could accomplish, and how much more you could save and buy (with cash), if the government didn’t keep driving up your basic costs (and, indeed, the cost of everything else) with regulation, while diverting 30-60% of what you’re worth to your employer in the form of taxes, mandated benefits, and “social investment.”
I’m talking about the natural resources we could be making use of if the state weren’t literally putting them off-limits to us. I’m talking about what each of us could do to escape the industrial-job straitjacket if the cost of starting a small business weren’t so prohibitive. Above all, I’m talking about the new lease on life the younger generations could have if their heads weren’t being filled with hate-thoughts about normal human life 24/7.
Imagine how the economies of the Western industrial nations would surge to life if people were allowed to profit from deciding to work however long it took to do profitable things. A simple proposition, but fewer and fewer of us can do that today. The idea of profit in any form is demonized; major segments of profitable work are effectively prohibited, either outright or through regulation; “jobs” are defined in terms of what benefits must accrue to them, rather than in terms of what needs doing; and when there is a profit, it gets hunted down and confiscated in one way or another. If the capital gains tax doesn’t get you, the regulation will.
Government, as Reagan said, is the problem. There is nothing we can’t do if we will allow the people to put our idled resources back to work. Those idled resources represent trillions of dollars in wealth and revenues. And those trillions would pay down an awful lot of debt. But they can’t be extracted from a controlled, limited, managed citizenry; they can only be produced by people who are free to labor and profit on the basis of their own motivations.
The impending collapse of the Eurozone is proof of the first truth. It represents the biggest opportunity Europe has had in a century to acknowledge the second, and act accordingly.
Europe, get rid of your failing welfare state, your unsustainable national health systems, your religious belief in regulation, and your “multiculti” hate-management schemes. Unleash your people. Get the demons of self-hatred and institutionalized discouragement off your back. This is the chance of a lifetime. Go ahead. Show us the way.
J.E. Dyer’s articles have appeared at The Green Room, Commentary’s “contentions,” Patheos, The Weekly Standard online, and her own blog, The Optimistic Conservative.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
GDP is normally defined as C (consumption) + I (private investment) + G (government spending) + [x - i] (net exports), but there is a fundamental flaw involved.
All of these assume that the result is desired: Consumption because people want to consume; Government spending because people want bridges and roads; net exports because other nations find value in our goods.
But Consumption is Consumption, even if it’s heroin; Government spending is included in GDP, even if it’s useless boondoggles like trains to nowhere or Solyndra. These are included in GDP even if they adversely impact the public.
And, when it comes to government spending, a great deal of government projects can actually be worse than useless — not only do they flush money away today to no benefit, but they create continuing obligations to flush money away tomorrow. A train to nowhere today wastes ever dollar of its construction….but also creates an obligation for continuing maintenance or wind-up costs on termination.
The reason that people feel that we’re still in a recession, though the GDP numbers might show otherwise, is because a large amount of the GDP is government deficit spending of zero or negative utility.
cthulhu on September 26, 2011 at 12:54 PM
Yes, I saw an awful lot of the ARRA money being spent on government buildings. New, bigger, better federal courthouse replacements, military base airplane hangers, etc, that besides costing 100′s of millions to build, now cost millions more to run and maintain. We grew government with ARRA. It was a temporary source of income for contractors, but a permanent drag on the economy for now and forever.
Allahs vulva on September 26, 2011 at 1:34 PM
I can personally attest to seeing the effects of Socialism on people’s desire to strive. There are many Europeans who would rather go get a drink on “little Saturday”, than worry about working a second job.
KMC1 on September 26, 2011 at 2:08 PM
Very well said.
Unfortunately I’d bet the loudest (media blessed) voices in Europe are going to be those that claim that the European adventure wasn’t “big enough” or not “structured quite right”. The problem with socialists is that it’s never the underlying philosophy that they blame for it’s inevitable failure but rather the particular details of the meddling that would work “if only next time…”.
gwelf on September 26, 2011 at 2:22 PM
Best piece yet, J. E. Dyer.
I particularly like this:
Thank you.
hillbillyjim on September 26, 2011 at 2:44 PM
It was interesting to see in the UK news media online the shift in the story line. Last week it was Greece will not default, that will be a disaster, to Greece must go through an orderly default. It won’t be like the unexpected collapse of Lehman. This time it will be different. This time the government[s] have plans, and the panic will be isolated to just those private investors who have Greek debt in their retirement accounts.
This time it will be the private investors who get the shaft, because now the Greeks are borrowing money from government backed professional money men, not amateurs, and everyone knows you can’t stiff the loan sharks because they will send someone over to your house and break bones if you try to escape payment.
Skandia Recluse on September 26, 2011 at 2:46 PM
Never. Gonna’. Happen.
Opposite Day on September 26, 2011 at 4:38 PM
I love you J.E. Dyer and you too hillbilly. No matter what happens in the next couple of years there are enough—I pray–rational people to make things right.
arnold ziffel on September 26, 2011 at 11:25 PM
This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.
Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.
Allahpundit on September 28, 2011 at 1:37 AM
Great writeup, J.E.
AH_C on September 27, 2011 at 11:01 PM