Paul Krugman is too extreme for the New York Times

posted at 12:15 pm on September 13, 2011 by
[ Memorials ]   

It is difficult to go overboard when writing for a newspaper as blatantly partisan as the New York Times, but liberal kook Paul Krugman is now floundering in the water, crying frantically for a life preserver.

After he said far too much in a cynical and insensitive post about 9/11 on the Times website on Sunday, touching off a firestorm of criticism, he decided to amplify on his remarks. On Monday, September 12, Krugman wrote:

The fact is that the two years or so after 9/11 were a terrible time in America….

It was a time when tough talk was confused with real heroism, when people who made speeches, then feathered their own political or financial nests, were exalted along with — and sometimes above—those who put their lives on the line, both on the evil day and after.

[I]t was a shameful episode in our nation’s history—and it’s one that I can’t help thinking about whenever we talk about 9/11 itself.

In his original post, Krugman went through the customary ultra-liberal posturing to reach the warped conclusion that 9/11 is “an occasion for shame” rather than for solemn remembrance. In support of this view he cites the exploitation of the terrorist attacks on America by “fake heroes … to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight, for all the wrong reasons.”

At least the “fake heroes” Krugman derides—he names Rudolph Giuliani and George W. Bush—are people with the courage of their own convictions. Krugman by contrast closed comments on his post for what he called “obvious reasons,” those reasons being journalistic cowardice.

The bigger issue is Krugman’s total lack of respect for those for whom 9/11 is a day set aside not just to mourn but to struggle once again to make sense of the incomprehensible. The sudden loss of a loved one ranks high among life’s stressors. But 9/11 was no accident. The manner in which 3,000 innocent Americans were killed was as deliberate as it was brutal. To appropriate such a hallowed occasion for petty nitpicking over politics is to deserve banishment.

Let’s hope the Times has the wisdom to let Krugman drown.

Related Articles

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Krugman has now entered Andrew Sullivan territory: someone whom we in polite society should just shun. Andy at least has the plausible excuse of mental illness, Paul does not.

rbj on September 13, 2011 at 12:33 PM

Oh, yes, please, K.O. Krugman! I could live on that amount of delicious, delicious schadenfreude for at least a year. :-)

Mary in LA on September 13, 2011 at 1:45 PM

I think what Krugman gets out of his lurch over the last dozen years into far left insanity is the same thing Keith Olbermann got out of his actions — adulation by a small but loud group of core supporters who mentally orgasm over the most strident invectives possible against their enemies.

My guess is Paul was never the most popular guy in his schools growing up, and there just aren’t that many economic fan boys/girls out there. But once he started seeing the positive feedback he was getting from a segment of the left from his attacks on conservatives, he decided the shriller the attack, the more his hardcore supporters love him.

So he’s getting enjoyment not just from spouting near blood libel about Bush, Giuliani and Kerik, he’s getting positive reinforcement from the people who love stuff like that, and they in turn are making Krugman get angrier, crazier and more paranoid by their reactions. Of all the people on the left over the years who’ve threatened to leave the country if Republican X gets elected president, I wouldn’t be shocked to see Paul high-tail it off for England in 2013 if Obama loses, because he’s pretty much come to believe his own rhetoric, and truly thinks the brownshirts will be descending on Princeton to haul him away if the conservatives regain control in Washington.

jon1979 on September 13, 2011 at 1:53 PM

Jason Blair, Wikileaks & Krugman. Three strikes & I’m out. Sorry NYT – but you suck.

BHO Jonestown on September 13, 2011 at 1:59 PM

Shouldn’t the headline read “… EVEN for the NY Times”?

princetrumpet on September 13, 2011 at 2:20 PM

James Taranto of the WSJ nailed Krugman to the wall when he dubbed him “history’s smallest monster.”

Mary in LA on September 13, 2011 at 3:14 PM

You’re kidding, right? The NYT won’t fire Krugman, especially when he is merely writing what the the publisher and editorial board believe themselves.

Watch the NYT and other, lesser mass media outlets become even more unhinged as the 2012 election approaches and it becomes clear even to the echo chambers of the Left that President Obama is in very real danger of losing his reelection bid. By comparison, that tawdry, bogus story about McCain’s supposed affair with a staffer will be like a kiss from an angel.

troyriser_gopftw on September 13, 2011 at 3:47 PM

I doubt the paper that covered up Soviet mass-murder will fire Krugman for being a self-righteous, dishonest revisionist, as long as he toes the Democrat line.

Merovign on September 13, 2011 at 4:16 PM

Drowning, perhaps – but crying frantically for a life preserver? Not at all; In fact, every time I think he could not sink deeper into the fever swamps of the left, he proves that that particular swamp has no bottom by swimming deeper still.

And the NYT will be there with his aqualung, should he need one – because he is one of them.

HobbesDFW on September 13, 2011 at 4:27 PM

Krugman’s posturing is nothing in comparison with all that brown stuff all over his nose. If I didn’t know any better, I would guess that he loves the smell

willardcsmith on September 13, 2011 at 8:49 PM

A silver lining to this time is that the masks fell off leftists once they got their messiah in power. They thought they didn’t have to pretend anymore.

Krugman’s work is nearly complete. Bellevue used to have a certain connotation, and Krugman deserves a long rest with medication. Maybe he’ll drag the whole NYT with him. Misery loves company and treason deserves it.

Feedie on September 14, 2011 at 12:30 AM

I purchased a book by the NY Times who had brief biographies on the victims of 9/11. How much was profit and where did the money go?

Fuquay Steve on September 14, 2011 at 7:01 AM

Krugman’s work is nearly complete. Bellevue used to have a certain connotation, and Krugman deserves a long rest with medication. Maybe he’ll drag the whole NYT with him. Misery loves company and treason deserves it.

Feedie on September 14, 2011 at 12:30 AM

I hope the NYT follows their lemming to the corner of Intellectual Insanity and Bankruptcy.

itsspideyman on September 14, 2011 at 2:33 PM