President ‘In-Between’ previews his jobs plan
posted at 11:02 am on September 7, 2011 by Howard Portnoy
[ Obama ]
You’ve got to accentuate the positive,Eliminate the negative,Latch on to the affirmative,Don’t mess with Mister In-Between.
This ageless advice comes to us by way of Johnny Mercer, and the president would do well to heed it at this critical juncture in his presidency. On Thursday he plans to appear before the American people to unveil a jobs plan of such import that it required a joint session of Congress as its backdrop. He should cancel the speech.
I say this not because of any presumption that he had something new and meaningful to add to the conversation. Rather, it is because the speech, which he previewed in Detroit on Labor Day, endeavors once again to play both ends against the middle. These spectacles, in which the brilliant president outwits us dolts, are becoming hard to watch.
Evincing that special talent Harry Reid ascribed to him of not using a “Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,” Obama told the crowd:
On Thursday, we’re gonna lay out a new way forward on jobs to grow the economy and put more Americans back to work right now. I don’t want to give everything away right here ‘cause I want y’all to tune in on Thursday. But I’ll give ya just a lil’ bit. We’ve got roads and bridges across this country that need rebuildin’. We’ve got private companies with the equipment and the manpower to the do the buildin’. We’ve got more than one million unemployed constructions workers ready to get dirty right now… Labor is on board, business is on board, we just need Congress to get on board.
In fairness, he didn’t mention “taking out” the Tea Party, but neither did he reprimand warm-up speaker James Hoffa for recommending that final solution earlier in the day.
This morning, Albert Hunt at Bloomberg sketched in a few particulars of the jobs plan. It is to ask Congress for another $300 billion that will be used predominantly on infrastructure projects and to extend the payroll tax cut. Both are gestures to Democrats, many of whom of late have bemoaned the fact that the 2009 stimulus wasn’t larger.
Lest you think there are no crumbs in the jobs bill to appease the president’s enemies, he will also call for a decrease in the portion of the payroll tax paid by employers. The hot button issues of entitlement cuts and deficit reduction will receive honorable mention as well, though specifics will be reserved for a later date—perhaps one where they become another president’s headache.
The obvious question—how does he propose to pay for this additional stimulus?—is answered by unspecified tax increases to be levied in later years. The preview doesn’t reveal which group of taxpayers Obama envisions picking up the tab, but I’ll give you two guesses.
In brief, the “new” jobs speech promises to be a train wreck. Its sole casualty will be Obama, since he’ll never get the House to sign off on it. Even if it were to squeak through, the plan would alienate his liberal base further by offering too little too late. Plus it gives his GOP opponents additional talking points about a president fresh out of ideas. Once again, Obama attempts to be all things to all people, but this time the stakes are much higher.
Related Articles
- WH: ‘No comment’ on union leader’s call for violence against Tea Party
- WH already playing down “major” jobs speech as just first leg of plan
- First glimpse of Obama’s big September jobs plan: Repeat the stimulus
- It takes a racist
Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
So if tax cuts are so beneficial, why push for future tax increases? Wouldn’t that be hurtful?
It’s so transparent that Dear Liar wants to be a beloved, tax-cutting president, pushing painful decisions onto bad, evil future presidents.
rbj on September 7, 2011 at 11:42 AM
Epic fail
cmsinaz on September 7, 2011 at 12:06 PM
You should notice that Obama always schedules his future negatives to hit after the election date… that’s why Obamacare kicks in 2014, and budget “cuts” occur over 10 years instead of 1.
dominigan on September 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM
Are talking about Obama or the formatting/video on this post?
uknowmorethanme on September 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM
You may have a valid take on his current actions, but this may be mild compared to what he might and probably will do.
It is a belabored point that Obama is a narcissist. Many very successful people, some have been competent presidents, but rarely had that been a problem. Obama is different. He is a narcissist, an almost un disputed fact. The question is; has it progressed to a psychosis, or mental illness in lay terms. His current and past actions tend to support that it has. His frequent basket ball pickups, golfing and long almost work free vacations probably are his way of dealing with the negatives of his psychosis; a way to recapture the lost feeling of success or to avoid the reality of failures that he faces. This latest view of his power, to demand a joint session of Congress seems a bit worrisome for everyone. If it goes as expected it will only increase his sense of failure, and there is the danger.
When narcissit face failure they can be very dangerous for those that they precive as the reason for that failure. For Obama that means almost anyone that is not among what he sees as the grassroots of the country, those that are most likey to accept the socialist views that he champions.
The danger of a narcissist failing is that they may seek revenge on anyone they feel are the reason for the failure. At the moment that is the Republican Party and the Tea Party, and to an extent, the Constitution itself which is incompatiable with his socialist goals. He will have the power before he leaves office to destroy anything that the Republican Party, Tea Party supportes and those that did not vote for him.
Franklyn on September 7, 2011 at 6:11 PM