Green Room

Israel being Alinskyed? – *UPDATE*

posted at 4:27 pm on September 5, 2011 by

… or just Greenberg-Carvilled?

An MSNBC news spot on The Weather Channel (TWC) this morning caught my attention.  Out of the blue, for no apparent reason, the news announcer informed his audience that thousands had taken to the streets in Israel this weekend to protest the high cost of living.  It was, he said, the eighth week of protests there.

TWC is usually about as interested in foreign social-protest news as Sports Illustrated.  In fact, street demonstrations abroad basically have to bleed if they’re going to lead in the American mainstream media.  People are out demonstrating around the globe all the time, and the average American hears about it only if he frequents the right specialty websites.  I couldn’t help noticing these few out-of-place sentences on Israel, because they were so unusual.

What possessed NBC-Universal properties MSNBC and TWC to feature protests in Israel in their news coverage this morning?  That’s an interesting question.  It is not, shall we say, made less interesting by the report of Maariv’s Kalman Libeskind, referenced by Arutz Sheva on 3 September, that American Democratic strategist Stanley Greenberg orchestrated the protests in Israel’s major cities this weekend.

According to the report:

Greenberg directed the strategists to create a protest that was not led by one specific group, in order to create social ferment. An unnamed left-wing leader would eventually step into this ferment and take the reins, Greenberg predicted.

The Israeli strategists reportedly include Boaz Gaon, Moshe Gaon and Eldad Yaniv, who worked in Ehud Barak’s successful race for Prime Minister in 1999, also in cooperation with Greenberg.

Greenberg, who advised Bill Clinton on campaign strategy in the 1990s (and Al Gore and John Kerry in their campaigns), runs the Democratic strategy firm Democracy Corps with James Carville and Bob Shrum.  He’s also a pollster with his own research firm, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner. Married to Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), he gained national fame for providing living quarters for Rahm Emanuel rent-free for five years.  He acquired additional notoriety for spearheading the effort to rebrand British Petroleum as the Greenest Big Oil Company in the Whole Entire Universe.

That’s the yada-yada most websites have on this today.  What I haven’t seen yet is an analogy to the fascinating project undertaken by the Greenberg-Carville firm in the Bolivian presidential election in 2002, when they were known as GCS.  The company was hired by incumbent president Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada (“Goni”) to run his reelection campaign, an essay in expeditionary politics that was captured in a documentary released in 2005 called Our Brand is Crisis.

The documentary was reviewed extensively by the leftosphere, with commentators tsk-tsking – suspended between irony and poignancy – over the excesses and the over-the-topness and the general run-amokedness of the GCS experts as they hacked a brazen swath through Bolivian politics.  The Boston Globe reviewer is typical:

Political documentaries don’t come any more shaming than Rachel Boynton’s terrific ‘‘Our Brand is Crisis,’’ a barely straight-faced account of what happened in Bolivia in 2002, when a group of US consultants helped a candidate win the presidency only to see the country slide into near-total chaos.

Globalism extends to the American way of campaigning, it seems, and the hubris of the gringo strategists — earnest ex-Clintonistas employed by James Carville’s Greenberg Carville Shrum group — would be hilarious if human lives and a country’s political will weren’t at stake.

It’s a galling and provocative experience to viewers of any political persuasion, and a reminder to the left of how easily idealism can run amok.

Well, sure.  If Republican strategists had done this, there would still be 33 people under investigation by a special prosecutor.  But if you’re satisfied about the poignant irony of the hubris, provocation, and gall juxtaposed with the idealism run amok, let’s move on to the strategy propounded by the GCS consultants in their strikingly candid interviews with the documentary crew. (Emphasis added.)

[Jeremy Rosner of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner] and his minions hold focus groups, print bar charts, and quickly decide on Goni’s campaign theme: crisis. The country’s falling apart, so who will you turn to?

It’s an uphill battle… ‘‘Over half the electorate really can’t stand you guys,’’ admits one of the consultants.

Against Goni are Evo Morales, a socialist firebrand who represents the country’s coca growers but who denies he’s a drug lord or a terrorist, and Cochabamba mayor Manfred Reyes Villa, a thoughtful pragmatist with a charismatic head of hair. Villa leads in the polls, so Rosner and company decide he must be taken down.

The consultants “happily discuss negative campaigning with the cameras rolling”:

Management consultant Tal Silverstein insists ‘‘we have to turn [Villa] from a clean candidate to a dirty one,’’ and articles go out fretting about his military experience and digging into his finances. ‘‘Tomorrow they’ll probably say I’m an associate of Osama bin Laden,’’ Villa shrugs in an interview.

Wrong. They tie him to the Moonies.

Go Google the reviews for more.  There are tons of them.  Given that Stanley Greenberg is one of this group’s leading lights, it should be no surprise that his approach, in enriching Israeli politics again in 2011, is to “create social ferment” so that an “unnamed left-wing leader” could step in and take the reins.  The country’s falling apart, so who will the Israelis turn to?  Libeskind seems to think Ehud Barak is being positioned as the turn-to guy – and given Greenberg’s connection with his 1999 campaign and the trio of Barak advisers, that doesn’t appear to be a bad guess.

Israel isn’t falling apart, of course.  Commentators there have had a healthy suspicion of the organizing force behind the series of protests, which started in mid-summer with demonstrations against the high cost of housing in the major cities.  In early August, Caroline Glick cited the work of Israeli bloggers in uncovering the following facts:

[A]s a handful of bloggers have shown, more than eighty percent of the protest leaders are professional far Left activists. For instance, Maariv bloggers Uri Redler and Rotem Sela researched the affiliation of all the speakers at the July 23rd rally in Tel Aviv. They found that out of 27 speakers, 21 are known leftist activists affiliated with Hadash, the communist party, with Meretz, with the New Israel Fund, with the Nationalist Left proto-party, and with the anarchists.

Redler and Sela also exposed that several “grassroots,” leaders are in fact professional political operatives affiliated with communist politicians and radical pressure groups. For instance, an activist named Tzika Bashour announced on Facebook that he would begin a general strike on August 1. Yediot Ahronot and Ynet covered his move as an authentic call of distress by an Average Joe.

The papers failed to mention that Bashour is a public relations executive who ran communist MK Dov Hanin’s campaign for the Tel Aviv mayoralty.

None of this means housing costs aren’t insane in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, or that Israelis don’t have legitimate beefs.  But with a little professional spadework, the blogging community has demonstrated that the “popular protests” look a lot like the ones orchestrated by the usual-suspect organizers in the United States; i.e., “Astroturf.”

Israeli-in-the-street bloggers aren’t buying the “social justice paroxysm” theme either.  Jerusalem Diaries is typical in reporting that the “protesters” out this weekend were mainly out for a nice time on a summer evening, with friends and food headlining the “protest.”  The Muqata called the demonstration in Tel Aviv the city’s “biggest block party ever.”  The socially-fermenting events featured well-publicized pop music and crowds snarfing down all the beer, cappuccinos, pizza, and puu-puus they could get their hands on.  There are highly organized professional malcontents manning these protests, certainly, but not an enraged citizenry ready to man the barricades and go to the mattresses with the Netanyahu government.

In light of this array of facts and associations, it’s no real surprise that Greenberg & Co participated in the 2006 Take Back America Conference sponsored by Campaign for America’s Future, an organization closely connected to the Apollo Alliance and funded by major unions, MoveOn.org, and the Tides Foundation.

It’s also interesting that Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, polling Wisconsin voters in February 2011, found that they “strongly agreed” with the state-worker-union agenda and opposed Governor Scott Walker, giving him a negative rating for his posture on public-worker bargaining rights.  But Wisconsin voters, when addressing not pollsters but the ballot box, have voted resoundingly this year – twice – to keep Walker’s Republican infrastructure in place, affirming originalist justice David Prosser in his state supreme court seat and returning a Republican majority to the state legislature in an August 2011 recall election.  The Greenberg poll in February, widely cited at the time, proved perfectly inaccurate as a predictor of voter decision-making.

Why does this matter?  Because it is of a piece with the manipulative, media-theme-building approach to politics Greenberg keeps being associated with.  He doesn’t have a history of being anti-Zionist; that’s not the point here.  Although he bills himself as a triangulating, “Third Way” centrist, his affiliations are very much with professional left-wing manipulators of public sentiment, and that is how he comes off in the latest instance with the protests in Israel.

To the question, “Why now?  Why in the summer of 2011?” the obvious answer would be, “Because the UN vote on Palestinian statehood is coming up in September.”  But I don’t assess Greenberg to be a mastermind here.  He’s a hired strategist.  His specialty is positioning politicians to be the turn-to guy.  Something else is going on.  As usual, the fact that GE-owned NBC networks are pointedly reporting faux “social ferment” as if it’s the real thing suggests a manufactured-news campaign.  Rockets from Gaza aren’t the only thing coming at Israel as the UN vote nears.

 

*UPDATE*:   A fellow blogger notified me of the statements made by novelist David Grossman, a leading figure of the Israeli left, while he is on a book tour in France this week.  Of the politics surrounding the protests this summer, Grossman had this to say at a meeting in Paris on 6 September:

 

The Israeli writer David Grossman believes that the social protest must . . . transform into a substantial political force and leverage its public success. . . “At the moment there is a consensus among all the participants in this protest not to speak of politics. . . But I believe that soon all these marchers will become a political force because this protest cannot remain a matter of good will alone. It must become a political means that will finally ask where did the money go, where did all those billions go over the years. The answer is that most of it went to the settlements, the settlers, and the army that defends the settlements that are a distorted situation and in any event will be evacuated in a future peace accord with the Palestinians.”

 
Grossman indicated that, “Now is not a good time to speak of politics and the occupation because the moment that they start to talk about it, the support for the protest will go down by 100s of percentage points.”

 

(Translation courtesy Emet m’Tsiyon.)

 

Grossman’s comments confirm two things.  One is this:  the sentiment on the Israeli left that the 2011 protests should be leveraged to create an impression of particular political demands (which, by the Greenberg strategy, will prompt the emergence of a politician ready to meet those demands).

 

But the other is this:  the demands that the left would like to see created are based on an unpopular idea.  Grossman – a leftist – judges that Israelis don’t support his narrative, which is that the high cost of housing and related social discontents were produced by the existence of the settlements and the “army that defends the settlements.”  He advocates holding off on introducing that narrative, because the people wouldn’t buy it.

 

Well, OK, his comments confirm a third thing.  He has a peculiar idea of the concept of “percentage points.”

 

J.E. Dyer’s articles have appeared at The Green Room, Commentary’s “contentions,Patheos, The Weekly Standard online, and her own blog, The Optimistic Conservative.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Oh brother, even twc going after Israel? If one here in America thinks bho will not put Israel under the bus, he did it to his own kin for crying out loud! God BE with you Israel and I pray for you daily. You have a RIGHT to defend your country and exist. The rop type want you gone off the face of the earth and they want the US along with you.
L

letget on September 5, 2011 at 5:24 PM

As usual, the fact that GE-owned NBC networks are pointedly reporting faux “social ferment” as if it’s the real thing suggests a manufactured-news campaign.

Let’s see…which company does Obama adviser Jeff Emmelt head…now, now, don’t tell me…let me guess…

Wethal on September 5, 2011 at 5:42 PM

You have to remember that for the first 30 years of Israel’s existence, the Democratic Party considered it “their” country — founded under Truman and with a ruling party that believed in lots of the social welfare state stuff that the current administration is trying to stuff down Americans’ throats. It was only the 1977 rebuff of Labor and installation of Likud and Begin as prime minister that created the hard schism between Democrats and the Israeli government.

Likud leaders like Begin, or Sharon, of Netanyahu are seen by Democrats as no different from any conservative Republican politician in the U.S., and since they see Israel’s history so tied to the country, they see no difference in trying to “take” Israel back for their side than they would trying to win back Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat from Scott Brown next year or to get Chris Christie out of office in New Jersey in 2013. They think jobs like those are by all rights theirs, and they see the leadership of Israel in the same way — it should be theirs by divine/secular right, and shouldn’t be held by some government that invites Sarah freakin’ Palin or Glenn freakin’ Beck over to visit.

That’s why Clinton had no problem sending Carvelle et al over years ago to intervene in the election to get Ehud Barak elected, because like some junior Democratic Senator from a northeast state, they believed Barak would do what Clinton told him to do, which was OK a peace deal with Arafat and get Bill the Nobel Peace Prize. The current administration is even more mendacious than that — they want to control Israel’s government to force peace deals with not just the Palestinian Authority, but Hamas, Hezbollah and the more anti-Israeli regime now in charge in Egypt in order to give the Obama Administration some foreign policy burnishing going into the 2012 election.

Not a pretty future to contemplate, but my guess is it will be harder to pull off this time than it was in 1999, because most Israelis remember what happened after Arafat killed the peace talks and the intifada began.

jon1979 on September 5, 2011 at 8:26 PM

J.E. Thanks for the insight. Understand that Greenberg is just a consultant advising the Israeli left on a strategery to regain control of the Govt. Just trying to figure out to what advantage to try and turn Israel back to a progressive govt when the progressives here see the Palis as the victims. I guess it’s just a classic faustian deal.

AH_C on September 6, 2011 at 10:47 AM

As usual, the fact that GE-owned NBC networks are pointedly reporting faux “social ferment” as if it’s the real thing suggests a manufactured-news campaign.

Going after Israel appears even more sinister, but The Weather Channel has been doing this kind of editorial content for quite a while now.

It is infuriating to tune in for the weather and get Progressive indoctrination. Like NPR reporters, they parrot and promote Algore’s AGW stance.

The debate is over! There’s no longer any debate in the scientific community about this.

Um, yes there is.

Fallon on September 6, 2011 at 12:01 PM

Dyer would have you believe that the largest and most widely supported protests in Israel’s history are a product of community organizers and the population wanting to get out of their houses for some music and socializing.

Just more porky pies from Dyer.

lexhamfox on September 6, 2011 at 8:41 PM

The Weather Channel has been doing this kind of editorial content for quite a while now.

Fallon on September 6, 2011 at 12:01 PM

Unfortunately true. I wrote a whole post about it last year, when TWC carried live coverage of the Obamacare signing instead of reporting on the weather. News updates in the early morning are one thing, and religious incantatations about global warming are at least related to TWC’s network mission. But carrying the Obamacare signing live was way over the top.

J.E. Dyer on September 7, 2011 at 1:35 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

“I repeat I am innocent of these charges. They are false.”

Just a reminder: People will die

Allahpundit Jun 28, 2017 10:41 PM
Top Pick

“Whipped cream’s killing more people than ever before.”

Medicare for all?

“There comes a point where you gotta get off the crazy train.”

Poll: Dem voters glumly sticking with Pelosi

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 8:41 PM

Disaster ahead?

“When she left it, it was in better shape than it had ever been.”

Manafort, firm registers as foreign agents

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 6:41 PM

Better late than never?

Delivered as promised

“I would like to think that the president saved many innocent men, women and children.”

“The Russia investigation was by far the dominant topic…”

The merry little media war continues.

Criminal enterprise

Politico: Has the SPLC lost its way?

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 3:01 PM

“The organization has always tried to find ways to milk money out of the public…”

Trump legal team backing away from Comey complaint?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 2:31 PM

De-escalation?

Time to get up and go to work, sir

CNN gets glum, defensive after resignations

John Sexton Jun 28, 2017 1:01 PM

“If Jeff lit himself on fire, it wouldn’t appease the pro-Trump media.”

Hmmm: FBI probing Russia-based anti-virus firm?

Ed Morrissey Jun 28, 2017 12:31 PM

“I wouldn’t put their stuff on my computer if you paid me.”

He works hard for the money…

It’s not a slippery slope. It’s a freaking avalanche.

Nuts.

Showdown: Sarah Palin vs the New York Times

Jazz Shaw Jun 28, 2017 9:21 AM

Defamation

Credit where creditor’s due?

More flash than bang, but a very bad sign

“Felix was out on bond after threatening another public servant and has a history of making threats.”

Chaffetz: House needs housing allowances?

Ed Morrissey Jun 27, 2017 8:41 PM

“There are dozens upon dozens of members living in their offices, and I don’t know how healthy that is long term.”

“This isn’t going to get a lot cheaper, it can’t, it won’t.”

“…what we failed to achieve with votes, we would do with weapons.”

“[S]o dumb it’s amazing we even have to have the conversation.”

“It was not necessary.”

“You’re inflaming everyone right here right now with those words!”

“Trump’s people said, ‘We’ll be writing the speech that the President’s Audio-Animatronic figure will be saying.'”

Excuses, excuses.

Not really a “kill all the lawyers” scenario

4 pm ET!