Green Room

Jon Stewart takes Newsweek to task over Bachmann cover

posted at 2:23 pm on August 10, 2011 by

Warning: Daily Show content embedded below. I provide this disclaimer because I know some people here hate Jon Stewart, and the Daily Show, often for perfectly valid reasons. However, when a gem is produced out of the muck, I like to make it available to those who enjoy the occasional bit of mirth directed at the left. Yes, he does use the same opportunity to attack Bachmann for some statements she’s made, but you takes what you can gets.

The shame is that Stewart could have taken a moment to point out the ridiculous Obama halo covers that Newsweek has employed, but you can’t have everything. At the rate Obama is disintegrating, though, I will be curious to see how the Daily Show handles the upcoming twenty-ring circus that this election cycle will become. While Stewart is a lefty, on numerous occasions in the past, he’s found himself unable to resist taking many of our political foes to task for their dipstickery.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The only reason he did this is because NOW and other lefty organizations also complained about the cover. He did it to join them and prove his bona fides.

Stewart is actually worse than Maher, Moore, et al.

He throws out these bones to add to his viewing audience and gain some middle-of-the-road folks to watch his show. But since 99% of it is lefty propaganda, the “new” viewers he drew in with a carrot slowly start to come his side of the “argument”.

He is nothing but a slick, squirrelly propagandist.

Opposite Day on August 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM

Heck, the only reason Newsweek did this is because they are largely forgotten and this gives them publicity.

cozmo on August 10, 2011 at 4:37 PM

If only Jon Stewart were funny.

J.E. Dyer on August 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM

Yeah, he sucks, and his larger point of attack on Bachmann was nasty and characteristically retarded, but at least he quoted her and didn’t just make something up, the way Newsweak seems to have done.

He makes a fair point and further exposes Tina Brown as the sleazy hack we all know her to be.

PS Yes, there is still, apparently, a Newsweak.

Jaibones on August 10, 2011 at 5:07 PM

The only reason he did this is because NOW and other lefty organizations also complained about the cover. He did it to join them and prove his bona fides.

Stewart is actually worse than Maher, Moore, et al.

He throws out these bones to add to his viewing audience and gain some middle-of-the-road folks to watch his show. But since 99% of it is lefty propaganda, the “new” viewers he drew in with a carrot slowly start to come his side of the “argument”.

He is nothing but a slick, squirrelly propagandist.

Opposite Day on August 10, 2011 at 2:55 PM
—–
He did it because it’s funny, fool.

You clearly never watch the show.

Dave Rywall on August 11, 2011 at 11:44 AM

If only Jon Stewart were funny.

J.E. Dyer on August 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM
——-
Just because his jokes hit too close to home and you lack the ability to laugh at yourself doesn’t mean you need to get all whiny.

Dave Rywall on August 11, 2011 at 11:46 AM

I don’t think Stewart was in any way taking up for Rep. Bachmann but was chastising Newsweek on the lack of substance in their attack on her.

Cindy Munford on August 11, 2011 at 2:45 PM

(Small voice) I think Jon Stewart is cute and funny and I laughed at the video. *ducks*

Bee on August 11, 2011 at 7:37 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM
Top Pick

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Top Pick

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?