Green Room

What does Obama want?

posted at 2:08 pm on July 29, 2011 by

Q: What does Obama want?

A: He wants a huge, and permanent, increase in the size of government. This is the “change” he campaigned on, but never really described. The goal was to make the US into a European-style “Social Democracy”.

Q: Does he really think he can finance it indefinitely with huge deficits?

A: Of course not. The plan was to corner the Republicans and force them to agree to huge tax increases in order to pay for it. So spending was raised first, and eventually the Republicans would face the choice of raising taxes or having the national debt spiral up to clearly unsustainable levels.

Q: Are Democrats in the House and Senate on board with this plan?

A: Mostly they are.

Q: Why haven’t they been honest about it?

A: Because they know that the majority of American voters would object. They’re trying to sneak the program through, relying on the fact that once it’s in place it will create its own constituency.

Q: Why haven’t the Democrats passed a budget for the last two years?

A: Because if they did, the cat would be out of the bag. It would be impossible to hide their real agenda if it was all down in black-and-white.

Q: And Obamacare is part of this?

A: Yup. The real goal all along was “single payer”, but that wasn’t legislatively possible even in a D-majority congress. So the bill was set up so that private insurers would continue, but the terms which would be forced on them would make them “voluntarily” leave the market. With no insurers remaining, the Democrats would then “reluctantly” pass a single-payer system.

Q: Is this something new?

A: Hardly. It’s the continuation of a process that began with FDR, and made huge gains with LBJ’s “Great Society”. Reagan tried to reverse it but failed. (Also, Reagan had other things to worry about, like winning the Cold War.)

Q: Is Obama going to win on this?

A: Your time is up. Please insert another quarter.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The plan was to corner the Republicans and force them to agree to huge tax increases in order to pay for it.

But these won’t pay for it. Which raises the larger point or question: the untenable world of the Left and what does it mean? How do you pay for something you can’t pay for? Does the Left realize tax increases, even taken to an absurd extreme, will not pay for it?

We are left with the notion of social collapse and the final authoritarian state that this implies. Is this what the Left really wants, ultimately? Or is it just where there atomizing and adolescent energy always leads?

rrpjr on July 29, 2011 at 2:38 PM

Q: What does Obama want?

A: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOdWxf1tRmI

mrt721 on July 29, 2011 at 3:18 PM

“What does Obama want?”

Come on. That’s way too easy, no quarter necessary. Re-election of the Wunderkind just before declaring himself Barrious Optimus Prime.

Robert17 on July 29, 2011 at 3:31 PM

How do you pay for something you can’t pay for?

Does the Left realize tax increases, even taken to an absurd extreme, will not pay for it?

Even incremental increases will have a detrimental effect on the economy and thus revenues necessitating an increase in taxes which will have a detrimental effect on the economy and thus revenues necessitating an increase in taxes which will have a detrimental effect on the economy and thus revenues necessitating an increase in taxes which will have a detrimental effect on the economy and thus revenues necessitating an increase in taxes which will have a detrimental effect on the economy and thus revenues necessitating an increase in taxes which will………………………

We are left with the notion of social collapse and the final authoritarian state that this implies. Is this what the Left really wants, ultimately? Or is it just where there atomizing and adolescent energy always leads?

rrpjr on July 29, 2011 at 2:38 PM

Is there any other reasonable conclusion?

Chip on July 29, 2011 at 3:51 PM

Tax increases can pay for it. Tax increases “only on the rich” won’t, though.

What the Dems want is a VAT, a big one. And at least in the short term (five to ten years) that would work.

In the long run it wouldn’t, of course, but they’re not thinking like that.

Steven Den Beste on July 29, 2011 at 4:32 PM

By the way, there’s no use arguing with me that it can’t work.

…or with them, either, for that matter.

Steven Den Beste on July 29, 2011 at 4:46 PM

Tax increases can pay for it. Tax increases “only on the rich” won’t, though.

Steven Den Beste on July 29, 2011 at 4:32 PM

When they say “Tax increases” they really mean Tax increases “only on the rich” anyways.

For the Democrats, It’s all about the redistribution of wealth.

The bottom 47 % should have to pay some taxes, but don’t expect them to back that idea.

Finally, instead of a VAT, what about the Fair Tax?

Chip on July 29, 2011 at 6:20 PM

The reason they like the idea of a VAT is that it’s invisible. Voters are paying it, but it doesn’t feel as if they are.

The problem with the Fair Tax is that voters will know they are paying, and know how much. That’s why you like it. It’s why the Democrats will avoid it like the plague.

Steven Den Beste on July 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM

Obama wants nothing less than the destruction of the United States of America as presently constituted.

“We are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America”

Just words? No. A defining principle, that’s what that was, and a treasonous one at that.

Therefore, nothing short of the political destruction of Barack Obama and the rest of the Democrat Party will suffice to save the Republic.

It’s just that simple folks. The sooner we realize that the sooner we can get to the grim task of cleaning this mess up.

turfmann on July 29, 2011 at 9:43 PM

Forget tax increases only on the rich or evil corporations who are sitting on all their cash. The progs already have that money spent and are turning their sights on the money in our 401Ks and IRAs. They need it to run all those wonderful programs. We’ll love those programs because they’re going to help us, too.

Kissmygrits on July 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM

A: Your time is up. Please insert another quarter. billion trillion dollars.

inviolet on July 30, 2011 at 11:45 AM

The reason they like the idea of a VAT is that it’s invisible. Voters are paying it, but it doesn’t feel as if they are.

The problem with the Fair Tax is that voters will know they are paying, and know how much. That’s why you like it. It’s why the Democrats will avoid it like the plague.

Steven Den Beste on July 29, 2011 at 6:32 PM

In other words, they want to use deception while robbing everyone blind.

Does that sound like an honest and transparent way to run a government?

Chip on July 30, 2011 at 3:23 PM

Forget tax increases only on the rich or evil corporations who are sitting on all their cash. The progs already have that money spent and are turning their sights on the money in our 401Ks and IRAs. They need it to run all those wonderful programs. We’ll love those programs because they’re going to help us, too.

Kissmygrits on July 30, 2011 at 9:14 AM

The National Socialist Left thinks that all wealth is “Collectively” owned, therefore to them it is perfectly acceptable for them to take your property because they don’t think its Your property.

Chip on July 30, 2011 at 3:25 PM

The goal was to make the US into a European-style “Social Democracy”.Soviet style dctatorship.

FIFY

SagebrushPuppet on July 30, 2011 at 4:55 PM

Obama wants the same thing that every leftist wants: the death of liberty, an end to truth, and the institution of hell on earth.

Why?

Because they’re evil.

leereyno on August 3, 2011 at 2:51 AM

From now on, it doesn’t matter what happens in government. I really believe we’re past the point of no return, in global terms. A badly weakened America leaves a power vacuum and the very real possibility of another uncontrollable world war.

RebeccaH on August 3, 2011 at 12:12 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM
Top Pick

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city