The WTP files: WH staff just like us… NOT!

posted at 9:58 am on July 3, 2011 by
[ Cronyism ]   

I’ve wanted to do a feature called the “We The People” for the longest time. During the writing of my new best-selling book (No He Can’t) I invoked the idea repeatedly, and people reviewing the text say it’s one of the best reminders they take away from the reading. SO… here we go:

CNNMoney is reporting that one out of every three White House staffers makes in excess of $100,000 dollars. And perhaps that wouldn’t be terrible if there were only 3, 9, 12, even 90 employees total. But there are 454.

And as the CNNMoney story points out, the list leans to the bigger payday. Only 3 WH staffers are volunteering their time – receiving no pay for the work they perform. (No doubt outside revenue allows them to donate their time to the nation’s cause.) But 21 staffers are raking in $172,000. Including newcomers Jay Carney and Bill Daley.

Supporters of the White House may say that as a contemporary CEO, the President’s salary of $400,000 and his executive team should receive competitive pay.

Yet one of the problems there is that in the world of real business, if anyone had produced the backwards “progress” that his team has, they would be getting pink slips, and taking hair cuts on options until they got the issues “turned around.”

There won’t be a huge outcry from the left on this, which is sad given that they like to play the class warfare game so often. But when you look at the average salary in the White House against the media salary for the American worker–you uncover one more “we’re better than you” scenario. And this where the aura of “us all being in this thing together” is growing thin and shrill for the one in ten workers looking for work who can’t find it, and the one in five American families who are working as hard as they can, but can not cover their most basic living expenses.

Parting question: The fact that CNNMoney is the one reporting on this disparity means “what” in terms of the middle left base that tends to put their trust in the Turner News property that supported Obama blindly through 2008?

I’m Kevin McCullough and that’s how I “Binge Think.”
And sometimes I write things to make you think too

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

There are two places in the United States doing really well in the current economic conditions — Texas and the District of Columbia metropolitan area. One’s successful due to free market conditions (mixed with Obama’s assinine oil policies that have made exploration in Texas wildly profitable), while the other’s a success by living off the tax dollars coming in from the 50 states. As long as a majority of the voters don’t object to all those six-figure White House jobs, you’re goingbto get more of them, even if the tax revenue doesn’t hold out.

jon1979 on July 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM

There will be more whether we like it or not.

And the money already hasn’t held out. That doesn’t stop them.

golfmann on July 3, 2011 at 10:28 AM

As long as a majority of the voters don’t object to all those six-figure White House jobs, you’re goingbto get more of them, even if the tax revenue doesn’t hold out.

jon1979 on July 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM

true…discussing this with my husband…his defense is, DC is very expensive to live, how much should they make? i will use Kevin’s argument above

Yet one of the problems there is that in the world of real business, if anyone had produced the backwards “progress” that his team has, they would be getting pink slips, and taking hair cuts on options until they got the issues “turned around.”


Thanks buddy….

cmsinaz on July 3, 2011 at 11:09 AM