Weird times in the Far East, Part 2

posted at 11:28 am on June 4, 2011 by
[ National Defense ]   

Part 1 can be found here.

Strange winds

For the last 40 years, Russia, China, and Japan have each relied on the presence and policy of the US to act as a stabilizing counterweight to the other two.  US policy in the region has not changed in its fundamentals since Nixon signed Okinawa back over to Japan in 1971.

But in late 2010, rumors were accumulating in East Asia that the US, tiring of a dispute with Japan over the placement of a Marine Corps air base in Okinawa, was beginning to look further south along the Asian perimeter for places to base American forces.  The Obama administration’s activities fed those rumors.

The reported intentions of the US about rebasing forces carried implications of a particularly destabilizing nature: first, that the US commitment to Japan might be weakening; and second, that America was looking to base Marine Corps and naval forces closer to the South China Sea and Strait of Malacca.  Hillary Clinton did nothing to dispel alarms about US military intentions in July 2010, when she proclaimed the disposition of the disputed South China Sea archipelagoes to be a US “national interest.”  (The US position had always been couched previously as an interest in freedom of the seas through chokepoint areas rather than the disposition of the islands.)

August 2010 saw a historic joint naval exercise between the US and Vietnam in the South China Sea, punctuated by the equally historic visit of USS George Washington (CVN-73) to Da Nang.  Much to Beijing’s chagrin, George Washington has also been a frequent visitor to the Yellow Sea in the last two years, after she became, in October 2009, the first US carrier to penetrate those waters since the Korean War (see here, here, and here).

The dual perceptions that the US may be losing interest in Japan, but is out to probe China’s most sensitive areas, are a potentially explosive combination.  China is bound to react badly to them, and that cannot fail to alarm Russia.

Russian forces in the Far East

So observers of the Russian military were interested, but not surprised, to learn in May that Russia would be deploying the first squadrons of her new Ka-52 army assault helicopter to the Far Eastern base of Chernigkova – instead of to a base in the Western theater facing Europe.  Other Asian reporting indicates Russia’s newest fighter jet, the Su-35, will also be deployed to the Far East.  Both types of aircraft will be based to the east of China’s extreme northeast border, facing the Sea of Japan; they are not being placed on the border with China in the Asian interior.

Russia is also planning to put the Mistral-class amphibious assault ships being purchased from France in the Far East.  The emerging character of the build-up in the region is one that would enable Russia to project power around China’s eastern flank, rather than confront China head-on in the continental interior.

Continued in Part 3.

J.E. Dyer’s articles have appeared at The Green Room, Commentary’s “contentions,Patheos, The Weekly Standard online, and her own blog, The Optimistic Conservative.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I wonder if we are going to see US bases again in Vietnam. In WWII, OSS supported the Vietminh against the Japanese. I always wondered if we had told the French to take a hike when they try to establish their empire on Indochina, if we had end up with a Tito like regimen, friendly to us and a dagger on China flank.

El Coqui on June 4, 2011 at 11:59 AM

Interesting question, El Coqui. I’m not sure things are going to develop at a leisurely pace in that regard. The world is changing fast.

J.E. Dyer on June 4, 2011 at 12:16 PM

Would the Turkmenistan–China gas pipeline and a completed New Eurasia Land Bridge reduce the importance of China’s SLOCs? This would affect encircling maritime forces and strategy.

NaCly dog on June 4, 2011 at 1:50 PM

What most people don’t realize about Viet Nam/US relations is that during the 1940′s we place sanctions against France because of France’s efforts to reconquer Viet Nam. This started to change with the fall of China and ended with the Korean War. These days, the Vietnamese and Americans have had a very friendly relationship for years.

Another interesting thing is the popularity of anti-colonialist TV Soaps, Specials and Historical programs in Viet Nam over the last several years. France and China are almost always the villains. The only time that America seems to show up is on an occasional “Agent Orange” victim documentary.

Note, I haven’t been in Viet Nam for over two months and won’t be back for about 12 days. My comments on Vietnamese TV programing are two months out of date

Linh_My on June 4, 2011 at 2:22 PM

I always wondered if we had told the French to take a hike when they try to establish their empire on Indochina, if we had end up with a Tito like regimen, friendly to us and a dagger on China flank.

El Coqui on June 4, 2011 at 11:59 AM

That is a very interesting theory. I’ve never thought of that angle before, just what a complete fustercluck our invasion was, both militarily and socially. Fortunately for us the Vietnamese don’t seem to hold grudges against the US!

Uncle Sams Nephew on June 4, 2011 at 3:49 PM

That is a very interesting theory. I’ve never thought of that angle before, just what a complete fustercluck our invasion was, both militarily and socially. Fortunately for us the Vietnamese don’t seem to hold grudges against the US!

Uncle Sams Nephew on June 4, 2011 at 3:49 PM

I think that we can thank the thousand year enmity that the Vietnamese people have against the Chinese. Vietnam and China waged war after we left and the Chinese got their ass whipped handily by them thanks to all the great opposition force training that we provided. We could not invent a better ally if we tried.

El Coqui on June 4, 2011 at 8:24 PM