Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Days 10/11

posted at 9:30 pm on May 7, 2011 by

Sorry about missing the Friday evening update; I decided to start switching my tracking spreadsheet to the certified results by county for the 60 counties, representing 2,329 reporting units and 801,991 votes, that have had their portions of the recount canvassed and certified by the Government Accountability Board as of Friday night. Between those counties and another 638 reporting units that have had their results reviewed but not yet certified (a total of 2,967, or 82.37%, of reporting units), 1,172,096, or just over 78%, of votes, have been recounted as of 6 pm Friday night. Combining that with the pre-recount canvassed results from the remainder of the reporting units, David Prosser’s unofficial lead over JoAnne Kloppenburg stands at 7,054 as of Friday evening, a drop of 262 from the pre-recount total.

The main reason why it took me the entirety of Saturday to do that integration is because 55 of those 2,329 reporting units that have been certified have changes from the running-total spreadsheet that was released by the GAB Friday evening. The net changes from that unofficial spreadsheet are Prosser -5, Kloppenburg +5 (or a net lead change of -10), and scattering -21.

In addition to the 60 counties where the recount has been certified, another 8 of the 72 counties have turned in recount results for all of their reporting units as of Friday evening. That leaves Dane, Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha Counties as the last 4 counties left to complete their recounts. The GAB expects that Dane, Milwaukee and Racine Counties will be done by Monday, and they will be in a Dane County courtroom Monday morning to seek a court extension of the deadline for Waukesha County.

Speaking of Waukesha County, they finally finished the recount of the city of Brookfield a bit after 6 pm Saturday. I don’t have the recounted totals, but the number of challenges raised by the campaigns, mostly the Kloppenburg campaign, climbed to over 400.

Barring news reports from one of the four counties that were not done as of Friday evening, I don’t anticipate doing another update until Monday. Indeed, the GAB has not updated anything Saturday, and does not anticipate doing so Sunday.

Revisions/extensions - The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported Sunday that Prosser gained a net 2 votes to his lead in the city of Brookfield. Meanwhile, WISC-TV reported that Dane County finished its recount late Saturday night, but they did not report what the changes were versus the pre-recount canvass.

R&E part 2 - Charlie Sykes posted the ward-by-ward results from the city of Brookfield.

I blog over at No Runny Eggs, and am on Twitter @steveegg

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Good work…

AH_C on May 8, 2011 at 12:37 AM

Your coverage of the recount has been better, by far, than any other source I’ve been able to find.

Very nice work.

BadgerHawk on May 8, 2011 at 9:27 AM

Thanks guys.

Steve Eggleston on May 8, 2011 at 9:57 AM

Thanks Steve. Great job. Talked to someone that lives in Brookfield and they are puzzled by the concern for the count there. They said they have never heard of anyone questioning the accuracy of voting there as it has always been a non issue. I think people are getting tired of the games.

wi farmgirl on May 8, 2011 at 10:25 AM

Quit now, Kloppy, while you can retain some shred of dignity. You know, that feeling you get when you do something right for your fellow citizens who are paying for this.

Kissmygrits on May 8, 2011 at 12:12 PM

David Prosser’s unofficial lead over JoAnne Kloppenburg stands at 7,054 as of Friday evening, a drop of 262 from the pre-recount total.

So, one way to look at this would be that an initial election result where, say one candidate won by 200 votes in this election, wouldn’t really amount to a hill of beans as far as being definitive. Thank you Joanne for establishing that point for us. It sure would make anyone who would claim complete victory by 200 votes look really foolish. And to think we wouldn’t have this insightful look if it weren’t for the efforts of Joanne.

Now isn’t that ironic.

parke on May 8, 2011 at 3:18 PM

parke on May 8, 2011 at 3:18 PM

Excellent point.

Steve Eggleston on May 8, 2011 at 7:48 PM