Green Room

Glenn Beck, Everyman: Why I’m Not Worried

posted at 3:29 pm on April 11, 2011 by

As Green Room regulars know, I am not an unqualified fan of Glenn Beck.  If I don’t cringe as much as some other legacy conservatives at certain of his over-the-top theories, it’s because I agree wholeheartedly with the proposition that he doesn’t represent the face of conservatism.  I’m not afraid of being mistaken by anyone whose opinion matters for a philosophical twin of Mr. Beck.

But that’s not why I’m not worried about his future in media.  Michael Van Der Galien expressed concern today that leftists will think they have succeeded in silencing him.  I’m not worried about that either, because I think the leftists who may be crowing over him have no more media power than he has, and in most cases probably less.

Beck may, in fact, be getting off of a traditional media vehicle, in a field facing declining margins and competition of increasing variety, at just the right time.  Fox News offers some variety and a viable alternative to the other 24-hour news channels, and we are blessed to have it.  But while we in the middle-aged contingent think of Fox as the “new” network, it’s still a conventional network, with all the baggage that brings.

And the media playing field has already shifted.  Opportunities are wide open for entrepreneurs to reach audiences outside of the established-network paradigm.  Oprah is undertaking one such venture, and it appears Beck is looking at launching another.  Somebody’s going to make it work.  No one thought, back in the late 1980s, that Rush Limbaugh could build and sustain a profitable AM radio audience, but he not only did so, he made the form and the medium a moneymaker for others.

I disagree with significant aspects of Beck’s message.  But there’s a sense in which he’s acting out – to a unique degree – the new-media possibility of Everyman reaching his fellows, on his own terms, to hash out the issues of the day.  That operation is qualitatively different from the paradigm of journalists, opinion writers, and broadcasting professionals putting together presentations according to the conventions of a specialized expertise.  I may not agree with everything that comes out of an enterprise like Beck’s, but I can appreciate that if it is to remain itself, it has to have some level of freedom from conventional editorial judgment.

It’s an interesting idea.  The possibilities of alternative media can only be fully realized by those who are most strongly motivated to take advantage of the relative freedom they offer – as opposed to relying on the proven path of convention.  Beck may be the guy who can make a go of alternative media “programming.”

I do think he will perform best if his Everyman trajectory carries him away from overreliance on the conspiracy-and-collusion construct to explain what’s going on around us.  There are always groups of people trying to take advantage of the vulnerabilities that societies allow themselves to fall into, but the remedy is not to focus in impotent anger on the “spooky dudes,” it’s to get  society’s house in order.  The battles in Congress over federal spending; the state battles over pubic unionism; the local battles over the public schools; the nationwide battle to unseat the legislatures and judges that have given us our current style of government – these prosaic fights are the ones that will make the difference.  Soros & Co. may be organizing on one side of them, but winning the battles is still a matter of political suasion and voting.

Tolerance for conspiracy theory is a minor pattern in Western society, and we can be grateful for that.  It’s a much more significant factor in the Middle East and Asia.  If Beck goes much further down that path, he will lose his appeal to the wider audience he still enjoys.

But I’m not convinced that there is value in his intellectual enterprise being constrained by the conventional approach of the old-media establishment.  Under such constraints, his thinking process would have no opportunity to find better balance and greater wisdom on its own.  In doing the latter, there is value.

There is value in doing it publicly too.  Glenn Beck plays a unique role in presenting facts and conclusions and making explicit the theoretical constructs by which he operates.  Too many Americans have never been taught to consider political and social issues by that method.  All of the other talking heads on the news channels comment according to ideological positions whose foundations are tacitly understood – on the right-hand side of politics, mainly by people over 50 – and rarely examined.  Beck is a public-schooled Everyman trying to parse the unspoken premises hovering over a national debate that takes place now largely in shorthand and code.

We will see if he finds his medium in the future.  Whether I agree with his conclusions or not, I think he is necessary.  I wish him well.

J.E. Dyer blogs at The Green Room, Commentary’s “contentions” and as The Optimistic Conservative.  She writes a weekly column for Patheos.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Thanks J.E. that was a good post. Still gotta say, we listen and watch Glenn. We read gobs of books he recommends and we have learned so much about our Republic you will never in a thousand years get from the msm. Glenn loves our Republic, from our Founders, the people of Israel, the black people who are being used by those who want to keep them down against what MLK wanted. I could go on and on. Glenn is a rare jewel. His views are so out of the main stream, that is why he is so hated by some and loved by others. I, also wish him well in whatever he does in the future. He will be very missed by our home on Fox.
L

letget on April 11, 2011 at 3:50 PM

The possibilities of alternative media can only be fully realized by those who are most strongly motivated to take advantage of the relative freedom they offer – as opposed to relying on the proven path of convention. Beck may be the guy who can make a go of alternative media “programming.”

Freedom. It’s just another word for nothing left to lose.

Thankfully, I think you have been able to accurately explain why Beck is bailing on Fox. He has nothing to lose and everything to gain with his new found freedom in the “alternative media.”

BigAlSouth on April 11, 2011 at 7:13 PM

Quite frankly, Fox has become a joke. They are becoming as leftwing as MSNBC. Sure they have a few conservatives, but O’Reilly who is the flagship seems to spend most of his hour trying to convince us that he’s giving the other side a fair shake instead of just presenting whatever it is he wants to tell us, good or bad, and I really wish he wouldn’t criticize Obama, then apologize for it like he “doesn’t mean that in a bad way”. Ridiculous. I barely watch Fox News anymore.

jaimo on April 11, 2011 at 8:07 PM

I am more worried for FOX than for Beck.

Fox seems to be losing much of it’s fair and balanced in favor of Shepherd Smith.

How can anything be fair when Smith runs so much of the news?

Smith is the one that needs to go.

petunia on April 11, 2011 at 8:52 PM