Green Room

Why Veena Malik’s Smackdown of an Egyptian Mullah was a Seminal Moment for Feminism

posted at 3:13 pm on March 30, 2011 by

Two days ago, Allahpundit picked up the story of gorgeous Pakistani actress, Veena Malik, courageously going off on an Egyptian Mullah who accused her of “immorality” because he didn’t approve of her appearance, or the fact that that she appeared on an Indian equivalent of the television show Big Brother. Jonah Goldberg was the first major blogger to report on this story, and it has been all over the right-wing blogosphere ever since. So, what makes this a possible seminal moment for feminism instead of just another viral video? Well…several things.

First of all, the liberal mainstream media has hardly been chomping at the bit to report any story regarding Islamic violence towards women. For example, when Time magazine featured a cover with a picture of a woman whose face had been disfigured by the Taliban, The New York Times called it “war porn” (see the image below).

Furthermore, when an Iranian woman was sentenced to be stoned to death last summer, and when a fourteen year old Bangladeshi girl was recently lashed to death for being raped by her cousin, you could pretty much hear crickets from the MSM because those were pesky, politically incorrect stories that didn’t fit their multicultural narrative. (Not to mention, you probably won’t hear that much about the woman who was recently raped by Gaddafi’s thugs in Libya either.)

Second of all, liberals seem to have an overwhelming tendency to downplay Islamic abuses towards women (as well as towards gays) under the guise of multiculturalism. Don’t believe me? Well, then I suggest that you read the column by liberal Boston Globe columnist Susan Jacoby where she asks the question, “Why are liberals excusing religious abuses on grounds of cultural relativism?” To be specific, Jocoby makes some great points when she writes the following:

The latest example of the Left’s blind spot on this issue is the antagonism of so many liberal reviewers toward Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s recent memoir, Nomad. The Somali-born Hirsi Ali immigrated to the United States in 2006 after her close friend, the Dutch film director Theo Van Gogh, was murdered by a radical Islamist. Hirsi Ali still needs bodyguards because of frequent death threats.

She was educated as a child in Muslim schools, subjected to genital mutilation, and broke with her family when she refused to consent to an arranged marriage. She first settled in Holland, where she worked as a Somali-Dutch interpreter, and her convictions about violence in many (though not, she emphasizes, all) Muslim families are rooted in her work with immigrants as well as her own upbringing. Yet Nicholas D. Kristof, reviewing Nomad for The New York Times Book Review, writes that “I couldn’t help thinking that perhaps Hirsi Ali’s family is dysfunctional simply because its members never learned to bite their tongues and just say to one another: ‘I love you.'”

I was startled by this patronizing comment, because I admire Kristof for being one of the few male columnists who writes frequently about violence against women. Somehow, “I love you” isn’t the first thing that would come to mind if I were being held down by female relatives while my clitoris was maimed or if my father told me I had to marry a stranger.

Moreover, Jacoby really finished off her column with a bang when she shared the following anecdote:

An 80-year-old friend of mine — a woman of forceful intellect who used to teach Renaissance history — now lives in a Florida retirement community where many of the part-time staff are teenaged children of recent Afghan immigrants. When my friend saw one of her favorite young Afghan-American women — a high school senior — weeping in the dining room, she asked what was wrong. “Oh, madam professor,” the girl replied, “my father has arranged for me to meet my future husband. He is 40 years old, and the wedding will take place in six months. I wanted so much to go to college, and this will not be permitted.

My friend replied gently, “You know, Yasmin, you don’t have to marry anyone in this country because your parents say so. There are organizations to help girls like you think these things through. There are college scholarships. I can give you the names of people to talk to.” Another resident of this community sharply reproved my friend, saying, “We have no right to interfere with her culture, her religion, her family,”

Wrong. This type of “interference” — telling a troubled young woman that she has choices other than an arranged marriage — is exactly what a true liberal ought to be doing. The idea that someone should ignore the tears of a 17-year-old who says she is being pushed to give up her education is utterly perverse.

Now, if you still aren’t satisfied, here is another example of liberal moral relativism with regard to radical Islam’s abuses towards women (as well as gays). Da Tech Guy wrote an excellent column titled, “You can tell a lot about a person by what they bold when quoting”. First, Da Tech guy demonstrated what liberal blogger, Matthew Yglesias, thought was important enough to put in bold type when he quoted Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s writings in her New York Times column about the Egyptian revolution:

I’ll tell you why: because Islam is the new fascism. Just like Nazism started with Hitler’s vision, the Islamic vision is a caliphate – a society ruled by Sharia law – in which women who have sex before marriage are stoned to death, homosexuals are beaten, and apostates like me are killed. Sharia law is as inimical to liberal democracy as Nazism. Young Muslims need to be persuaded that the vision of the Prophet Mohammed is a bad one, and you aren’t going to get that in Islamic faith schools.

Next, Da Tech re-pastes the exact same quote from the exact same column, but puts in bold type what he finds to be important in Ms. Ali’s column:

I’ll tell you why: because Islam is the new fascism. Just like Nazism started with Hitler’s vision, the Islamic vision is a caliphate – a society ruled by Sharia law – in which women who have sex before marriage are stoned to death, homosexuals are beaten, and apostates like me are killed. Sharia law is as inimical to liberal democracy as Nazism. Young Muslims need to be persuaded that the vision of the Prophet Mohammed is a bad one, and you aren’t going to get that in Islamic faith schools.

Nifty little trick ain’t it? Furthermore, it’s pretty telling that Mr. Yglesias found Ms. Ali’s supposed “intolerance” to be the most bothersome part of that passage, whereas the rest of us find the whole stoning of women and beating of gays to be the most troublesome part. (Oh, but best not to mention that politically incorrect line, because then you have just officially sinned on the liberal alter of multiculturalism.)

And finally, the ultimate examples of liberals downplaying the Islamic abuses of women are Naomi Wolf writing a column about how sexy the burka is, and Amanda Marcotte (she of “Godbag Christofascist” fame) writing that the traditional Western wedding is comparable in misogynist tradition to female genital mutilation. (I’m not kidding.)

Now, the third and final reason why Veena Malik’s smackdown of an Egyptian cleric is a seminal moment for feminism is because the liberal MSM tends not to air the voices of Muslim women who don’t parrot their talking points. For instance, during the Ground Zero Mosque brouhaha, moderate Mulsim, Neda Bolourchi (whose mother was killed in 9/11), wrote a column in The Washington Post titled, “Build Your Mosque Somewhere Else”–needless to say, she was never invited on any MSM outlets/talk-shows. Not to mention, the liberal MSM has hardly rolled out the welcome wagon for Ayaan Hirsi Ali either. Furthermore, when moderate Muslim, Raheel Raza, was speaking out against the Ground Zero Mosque and calling it “a slap in the face to all Americans”, only conservative talk show hosts, like Bill O’Reilly and Sean Hannity, would have her on as a guest.

So, when a Muslim woman from a Muslim country feels free to, you know, actually speak her mind without the threat of stoning when attacked by a real misogynist for her appearance, does she talk about how awful the “Godbag Christofascists” are…or how much better FGM is to endure than a wedding ceremony…or how sexy the burka is…or how racist America is for not wanting the Ground Zero Mosque? Well, not exactly. When Veena Malik gets really fired up at around 3:00 into the embed below, she let’s loose about how people are “killing in the name of Islam”, how the politicians in Pakistan are “committing murder, bribery and theft”, and how clerics are “raping children in the mosques in Pakistan”. Then, Ms. Malik really handed that cleric his arse when she told him that “Pakistan is infamous for many reasons other than Veena Malik”. In other words, she looked like she had absolutely no interest in donning a burka, but a lot of interest in her country not being overrun by true misogyny, corruption and violence.

In conclusion, I think that David Frum hit it out of the park in his excellent column titled, “Feminists need to admit that Western men are not the enemy”, when he wrote the following:

A generation ago, feminists could romanticize non-Western misogyny from a safe distance. In 1984, the Australian feminist Germaine Greer published a book, Sex and Destiny, denouncing birth control as a Western plot against Third World women. But since the 1980s, a great movement of populations has erased the distinction between the First World and the Third. Europe now receives more immigrants than does the United States. European cities are now crowded with hijabs and burkas. European police investigate honour killings. European hospitals confront female genital mutilations.

And these things all happen in North America, too, albeit to a lesser degree.

On this 100th International Women’s Day, the challenge for feminists has become both imperative and anguishing: Will they argue forever against American television sitcoms of the 1950s — or are they morally and intellectually capable of recognizing the dangers to women’s aspirations in the 21st century? Can they transcend their inherited ideology, and recognize that the best and only guarantee of women’s equality is Western liberal democratic capitalism? Will they accept critics of Third World misogyny — such as Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Irshad Manji — into the pantheon of feminism along with Mary Wollstonecraft, Susan B. Anthony and Simone de Beauvoir? Can they perceive that the people who would destroy Israel hate women even more than they hate Jews?

In short, can they accept that the irony of history has reoriented feminism into a fundamentally conservative movement? Or will their inherited ideological prejudices entrap them forever in a vanished world — dooming feminism to obsolescence and subjecting the dwindling rights of women to the aggressions of “multiculturalism”?

In other words, those nasty “Godbag Christofascists” aren’t the ones trying to suppress the rights of women all over the world; however, radical and fundamentalist Muslim clerics, like the one yelling at Veena Malik, are. Someone needed to finally get angry and say–nay, shout–what everyone (except the liberal MSM) has known to be true for a long time.

Thank you Veena Malik for having the courage and forbearance–even in the face of death threats–to shout out the truth.

Cross-posted at Parcbench, The Minority Report, and Right Wing News.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Great piece. Thanks.

rrpjr on March 30, 2011 at 4:50 PM

Thanks so much for the kind words.

Take care. 🙂

X0X0, Suzi

Susannah Fleetwood on March 30, 2011 at 4:59 PM

Fscking AWESOME write-up. Very well done.


Abby Adams on March 30, 2011 at 5:29 PM

Great piece. Viva Veena!

perries on March 30, 2011 at 5:32 PM

Here’s another one: Australian female hotel worker in the UAE was imprisoned for 8 months because she was raped.

That’s right, she was the victim of four rapists who drugged her at her place of work.

And she was charged with adultery and jailed after she went to the police. This was reported yesterday in the UK Daily Mail.

That’s Islam for you.

— Nora

The Thin Man Returns on March 30, 2011 at 5:40 PM

Great piece. Who do the feminists on the left stand with? What are their motives of supporting such oppression? It seems correct that in their blind fury against the US 1950’s they are overlooking the evil that’s horrified women of the world since the 7th century.

NTWR on March 30, 2011 at 6:23 PM

Thanks so much Abby–I really appreciate your enthusiastic comments!

Take care, and thanks for reading. 🙂

X0X0, Suzi

Susannah Fleetwood on March 30, 2011 at 6:25 PM

Thanks NTWR, perries and everyone else who has commented thus far–I really appreciate the kind words.

Take care. 🙂

X0X0, Suzi

Susannah Fleetwood on March 30, 2011 at 6:29 PM

Awesome piece! Looking forward to reading more.

Mary in LA on March 30, 2011 at 6:39 PM

Is a Mufti a Mullah? The gentleman in the video is identified as “Mufti Abdul Qavi.” [Wiki: A mufti is a Sunni Islamic scholar who is an interpreter or expounder of Islamic law (Sharia)] and a Mullah is “generally used to refer to a Muslim man, educated in Islamic theology and sacred law.” If Mufti Qavi is a Sunni, is it incorrect to refer to him as a Mullah?

BigAlSouth on March 30, 2011 at 6:45 PM

This needs to be front paged. Insightful and timely. Great job pulling all these toxic “feminist” memes in one essay. Thank you!

NaCly dog on March 30, 2011 at 8:14 PM

liberal moral relativism

Exactly. The inability or unwillingness to identify right and wrong. For generations we knew right from wrong, but because that knowledge was Bible-based, Leftists told us it was “bad”. Now we’re living with the alternative. When Goldberg first ran this story a few days ago, I watched and thought that Miss Malik was gutsy for taking on the Islamofacist. My prayers go with that lady.

oldleprechaun on March 30, 2011 at 10:36 PM

Outstanding post, my friend. ~SA

SusanAnne Hiller on March 30, 2011 at 10:44 PM

Excellent article. Keep up the great writing.

Unfortunately, feminists study philosophy, not history. Fantasy vs. Reality.

I don’t expect them to change.

gobblemom on March 30, 2011 at 10:59 PM

Thanks so much SusanAnne–that means a lot coming from a writer of your stature. You are a good friend.

Take care, and have a great night. 🙂

X0X0, Suzi

PS–Thanks so much to gobblemom, oldleprechaun and NaCly for the insightful comments and the kind words. I always love to hear from my readers.

Susannah Fleetwood on March 30, 2011 at 11:24 PM

Susannah, This was was of the best posts I’ve read in a long while that just doesn’t tell me a news story that I can pull off of Drudge. Your dissection is spot on and this post is absolutely made of awesome!

SusanAnne Hiller on March 30, 2011 at 11:28 PM

Man, Susan Anne, you’ve left me speechless (tears up). Again, this means so much coming from a writer of your caliber.

Have a great night! 🙂

X0X0, Suzi

Susannah Fleetwood on March 30, 2011 at 11:57 PM

Excellent analysis, and right on target (can I say that?).

I would just like to add, from the perspective of a red-blooded American male, forcing this woman into a burkha is a criminal offense against natural beauty.

She is stunningly gorgeous, and more so when her conviction and fire come to the forefront.

How many other fierce beautiful ladies like this are currently hidden from the world, imprisoned in an ideological dungeon?

It really makes me sick to think about it.

Brian1972 on March 31, 2011 at 8:21 AM

Despite the Frum reference (just kidding) this is one of the best posts on HA in a very long time. Thanks, and in my opinion our political leaders of all stripes should be taking up this cause. We need to celebrate Veena Malik and others like her if there is to be change in Muslim society.

On the broader point, progressives are too often sympathetic to fascism, if not actual fascists themselves, and calling them on it needs to start with the obvious (like you did here) before we move on to difficult questions like crony capitalism with AARP and GE and the suppression of free speech by judges in Wisconsin.

MTF on March 31, 2011 at 8:58 AM

To expand on the great John O’Sullivan’s law: All organizations that are not actually right-wing will over time become left-wing and pursue left-wing, rather their original, causes.

This is true not only for feminists, but also environmentalists, union bosses, political parties, ad infinitum. Once this transformation takes place, these organizations will tend to support causes that further the grand left-wing agenda, rather than the original intent of the group.

Thus, environmentalists will back any cause that hurts capitalism (global warming, ozone depletion, DDT scare, snail darter, spotted owl, etc). Union bosses prefer destroying the businesses that employ their members to any compromise. Politicians will kiss anybody’s aspirations, just so long as they can do so with tax-payer’s money.

And, of course, for Feminists, no cause is more important than promoting the left-wing world view. A million-plus babies aborted in the US every year? No big deal because mau-mauing Republicans about “women’s reproductive rights’ makes women vote for DemocRATs in droves. So why don’t Feminists strike out against institutional Islamo-misogyny? Simple, Muslims vote DemocRAT – you could look it up.

Knott Buyinit on March 31, 2011 at 9:45 AM

This better end up on the front page.

MadisonConservative on March 31, 2011 at 10:31 AM

Thanks for the kind words, Madison Conservative. I appreciate you!

Oh, and Knott Buyinit, MFT and Brian 1972, thanks so much for the thoughtful comments. I always enjoy reading my readers thoughts.

Take care everybody. 🙂

X0X0, Suzi

PS–Brian 1972, I loved it when you wrote, “I would just like to add, from the perspective of a red-blooded American male, forcing this woman into a burkha is a criminal offense against natural beauty.” LOL–I love it!

Susannah Fleetwood on March 31, 2011 at 2:27 PM

This post has been promoted to

Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.

Ed Morrissey on April 2, 2011 at 2:57 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

It’s more about the powers of the Presidency at this point

A second look at paper ballots?

Jazz Shaw Jun 26, 2017 10:41 AM
Top Pick

Low tech solutions to high tech crime

No extra beatings required, thanks

A “”massive, massive f*** up…”

This is totally amazing!

McConnell may not get his wish on health care vote

Taylor Millard Jun 25, 2017 7:31 PM

Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”

Helping others without the government.

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”