Green Room

Paul Krugman Wants to “Balance Out” the Power of…Big Taxpayer?

posted at 1:00 pm on February 21, 2011 by

Paul Krugman has another hysterical column in today’s NY Times:

What Mr. Walker and his backers are trying to do is to make Wisconsin — and eventually, America — less of a functioning democracy and more of a third-world-style oligarchy.

There are liberal diarists at Daily Kos who would be embarrassed to publish this sentence. This goes far beyond calling someone unpatriotic. Krugman is accusing one party of wanting to destroy the Republic. So when Republicans aren’t offending Krugman’s sensibilities by reading the Constitution aloud on the House floor, they’re tearing down democracy. And then his column gets dumber:

And that’s why anyone who believes that we need some counterweight to the political power of big money should be on the demonstrators’ side.

In case you thought this was a throw away line, he comes back to this point later in the piece:

On paper, we’re a one-person-one-vote nation; in reality, we’re more than a bit of an oligarchy, in which a handful of wealthy people dominate. Given this reality, it’s important to have institutions that can act as counterweights to the power of big money.

Do you immediately see the problem here? How exactly are public sector unions a balance to the power of big money? Granted, if Krugman were writing about private sector unions this would at least be arguable. As it is, he’s writing about public sector unions. And guess what, public sector union aren’t in a struggle against the titans of industry. They get their money from the government.

If you want to simplify it even further, public sector unions are a special interest aimed at extracting more money from taxpayers. So let it henceforth be known that Paul Krugman wants a check on the power of Big Taxpayer. Does that sound like a sensible idea to you? Me either. Maybe that’s why there is a long history of exempting the public sector from union organizing. Perhaps Mr. Krugman should check out this article in his own paper and get back to us.

But he’s not done yet. Next we come to the big lie in Krugman’s pro-union opus:

Contrary to what you may have heard, public-sector workers in Wisconsin and elsewhere are paid somewhat less than private-sector workers with comparable qualifications, so there’s not much room for further pay squeezes.

Notice he says public sector unions make slightly less than their private counterparts if you rank by level of education. This last bit is critical because it happens to be the only way the numbers come out right. In fact, as I explained here (in regard to the same debate over New Jersey public workers) even the liberal EPI agrees that public sector employees are only behind until you correct for the number of hours they work relative to their private sector counterparts. Yes, it’s true that public school teachers make less on an annual basis than private sector workers with college degrees, it’s also true that teachers only work 9 months a year. If you look at their salary and benefits on an hourly basis, they come out ahead (often well ahead) of private sector employees. Manhattan Institute has a paper on correcting for this difference here.

Paul Krugman isn’t a dumb man. He knows where he is eliding the truth in these columns. He also knows that most of his readers won’t know. He’s obviously counting on their ignorance. As for myself, I’m selling out to the power of Big Taxpayer. Let’s break up the public sector unions, especially the teacher’s unions which do as much harm to our children as they do to our budgets.

Update: Looks like Krugman made a factual error in this column that I overlooked. He wrote:

Tellingly, some workers — namely, those who tend to be Republican-leaning — are exempted from the ban; it’s as if Mr. Walker were flaunting the political nature of his actions.

Add it to the list of Krugman’s mistakes. Turns out only 4 of 314 police and firefighter unions in WI supported Gov. Walker. The largest statewide unions all supported his opponent. Click over to Newsbusters for proof courtesy of Noel Sheppard. Krugman made a complete hash of this column.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Paul Krugman isn’t a dumb man. He knows where he is eliding the truth in these columns. He also knows that most of his readers won’t know. He’s obviously counting on their ignorance. As for myself, I’m selling out to the power of Big Taxpayer. Let’s break up the public sector unions, especially the teacher’s unions which do as much harm to our children as they do to our budgets.

I am a taxpayer. I know better.

Public-sector unions =/= private-sector unions.

Who speaks for me in public-sector union negotiations?

gryphon202 on February 21, 2011 at 1:18 PM

gryphon202 on February 21, 2011 at 1:18 PM

You are merely a taxpaying pawn in public-sector negotiations. You do not have a say in the negotiation process, you can only hope that your November vote is contributory at installing a politician that may negotiate in a manner favorable to your taxable burden.

ericdijon on February 21, 2011 at 1:25 PM

Actually, Krugman makes an important point without realizing it — that government is too big and does too much, therefore having too many employees who are seeking too much money from the Big Taxpayer. After all, there should not be “Big Taxpayer at all — all of us should be small taxpayers with small tax bills that cover only those truly essential services that individuals cannot effectively provide for themselves.

The problem is, Krugman is too blinded by his liberal class warfare to recognize the point.

RhymesWithRight on February 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM

Paul Krugman has another hysterical column

In BOTH senses of the word.

DrAllecon on February 21, 2011 at 3:00 PM

You are merely a taxpaying pawn in public-sector negotiations. You do not have a say in the negotiation process, you can only hope that your November vote is contributory at installing a politician that may negotiate in a manner favorable to your taxable burden.

ericdijon on February 21, 2011 at 1:25 PM

I’m a little jaded…

Palin/Walker ’12…?

gryphon202 on February 21, 2011 at 3:10 PM

oh that’s rich…the AFL-CIO…Teamsters..etal …are now da lil guys

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

roflmao

donabernathy on February 21, 2011 at 4:10 PM

Paul Krugman. Didn’t he win some kinda prize or sometin?

BigAlSouth on February 21, 2011 at 7:02 PM

Paul Krugman. Didn’t he win some kinda prize or sometin?

BigAlSouth

I think he’s retired “Buffoon of the Month” ….

BD57 on February 21, 2011 at 7:48 PM

Big Money?”

crazy_legs on February 22, 2011 at 8:16 AM

This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.

Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.

Ed Morrissey on February 22, 2011 at 2:55 PM

The problem is, Krugman is too blinded by his liberal class warfare to recognize the point.

RhymesWithRight on February 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM

Krugman is a progressive ideologue who is an elitist that considers himself providing enlightenment to the ‘unwashed’.

Let me see if I can put this in terms that no one can misinterpret. Paul Krugman is a self-indulgent boor, a very small man with a very large ego.

belad on February 22, 2011 at 10:41 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

McConnell may not get his wish on health care vote

Taylor Millard Jun 25, 2017 7:31 PM
Top Pick

Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”

Top Pick

Helping others without the government.

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…