Protesting Milwaukee Teachers Earn Triple the City’s Per Capita Income
posted at 10:46 am on February 20, 2011 by Howard Portnoy
The way Chris Wragge of the CBS Early Show describes the situation—“schools [in Wisconsin] have been closed”—you’d think a blizzard had descended on the region. In point of fact, the closures are the result of teachers walking off the job to protest Governor Scott Walker’s demand that public workers do their part to help balance the budget.
In order to help the state overcome a $3.6 billion budget shortfall, teachers, like other unionized employees, are being asked to cover a portion of their pension and their health care costs. And they don’t like it. Stephen Stromberg, writing in the Washington Post, provides a compilation of some of the signs protesters are carrying outside the Capitol in Madison:
Care about educators like they care for your child
RAPE Is Never ‘a Good Choice’! (Raping public employees is not the way to balance the budget)
And, lest there be any doubt about which side of the ideological divide the protesters come down on:
Why Do Republicans Hate People?
In defense of his cost-cutting plan, Walker said on the Early Show:
[I]t is a modest request of our employees…. [W]hat we’re asking for is still a lot less than what most of our average taxpayers are paying [for health and pension benefits].
Of course it could be argued that one man’s “modest” is another’s “massacre.” Will these benefit cuts create a hardship for Wisconsin teachers?
Not, it would seem, if they work in the state’s largest city, Milwaukee. The video below was compiled by the MacIver Institute for Public Policy, a Wisconsin-based think tank. According to Deb Wegner, Manager of Financial Planning for the Milwaukee Public School System, who appears early in the video, the average salary for an MPS teacher is $56,500. This amount, a voiceover reveals, is:
more than double the city’s average salary. More than the city’s median income. The U.S. Census Bureau reports the per capital income in Milwaukee from 2006 to 2008 was just over $19,000. Median family income was almost $43,000.
Later in the video, Wegner notes that
the cost of a teacher, plus benefits, will be $100,005 in fiscal ’11….
One might argue that Milwaukee’s nearly 7,000 teachers and educational assistants are entitled to their generous salary/benefit packages. After all, as one of the above-described protest signs implies, “educators” in Wisconsin “care for your child.”
But a second video from the MacIver Institute suggests teachers in Milwaukee are doing a less than stellar job with their young charges. Of students in grade 10, only 41% are proficient or advanced in reading, and 28% are proficient or advanced in math.
Related Articles
- Obama joins the fray in Wisconsin: Governor says butt out
- The view from Wisconsin: Is the left willing to make sacrifices?
Cross-posted at the Examiner. Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
These teachers, as union members, could call for a vote and over ride the Union edicts. Yes, it does work that way. They won’t. The only conclusion to draw is that they will not do their part to even the pain. The next logical conclusion is ‘greed’. Then there’s the final question. Are these teachers and their Union willingly going to be the cause of massives lay offs of their own and many others? Who will have to shoulder the blame? It’s pretty obvious to all but them.
jeanie on February 20, 2011 at 11:09 AM
……when the school kids start paying union dues: ….is when the teachers Union will start really giving a hoot about the kids…
sbark on February 20, 2011 at 11:17 AM
Maybe the teachers should just go ahead and DEMAND an increase in salary and benefits totaling $1,000,000/year each, threaten a strike, call in the NFL lawyers, the NLRB, then graciously back down to $800,000/year, demonstrating how reasonable they can be. Certainly we’ve seen their reasonableness displayed on national TV for days now and should expect no less.
Robert17 on February 20, 2011 at 12:09 PM
To sbark,
Your line was originally delivered by Al Shanker
back in 1967 during the UFT’s 2 month strike over community control.Shanker was always upfont about his role and duty as a union leader.It was protecting the jobs and working conditions of the members.But during his tenure the UFT rarely if ever involved itself in school management, curriculum or other issues.Unlike the NEA which saw itself as a vehicle to socialize America, Shanker, a socialist, ousted the Reds from the union and focused on providing compensation and protections for the members.His fight against community control put him opposite the New Left and Black Power groups of the day who wanted black control and black teachers in predominantly black schoolsHis succesor Sandy Feldman mostly stayed the same course, but Randi Weingarten saw the union as a political player and formed alliances with any number of lefty groups and pols to increase her influence.It became impossible to separate the UFT/AFT from the NEA.
xkaydet65 on February 20, 2011 at 4:57 PM