Green Room

Another Court Orders Obama to Drill or Get Off the Pot

posted at 12:30 pm on February 18, 2011 by

The Obama administration already found itself in hot water once this year over its drilling permitorium when a federal judge effectively found them in contempt of court on the issue. Now, only a few weeks later, the judicial branch is back in action, demanding that Obama’s EPA get back to the business of approving drilling permits or demonstrate why they can not.

Court Orders U.S. to Decide on Drilling

WASHINGTON—A federal judge ordered the Obama administration to decide within 30 days whether to grant a set of five permits for deep-water drilling projects in the Gulf of Mexico, saying the administration’s inaction on the requests is “increasingly inexcusable.”

The order, by Judge Martin Feldman of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, ratcheted up the pressure on the administration, which last fall lifted a months-long moratorium on deepwater drilling but has yet to grant any permits to drill new oil or natural-gas wells at depths greater than 500 feet.

The ruling came on the same day a consortium of large oil companies said it had fulfilled a key demand of the administration: that the industry set up a response system to quickly shut a gushing underwater well, minimizing the risk of another accident like the one last April at a BP PLC well in the Gulf of Mexico.

Energy companies have been expending billions of dollars jumping through every hoop the EPA sets in front of them in their efforts to get back to work. It seems, at long last, that they are forced to seek a judicial remedy to the matter. This case is taking place in Louisiana, one of the states hardest hit by the permitorium, so don’t expect a lot of public sympathy for the President to emerge.

With thirty days to decide, and likely a number of legal tricks up their sleeves to delay further, we still may not be close to the end of the road on this one. The real question is how many more rigs will finish pulling up stakes and heading for foreign waters before the permits begin to be issued again? And how long will it take to get them back here and back to work once that happens? By that time the job losses and total economic impact will have left a sour taste in the mouths of most residents, both for the EPA as an agency and for the President’s silent participation in this scheme.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


It seems bho and team have no intentions at all of obeying the law this judge/any judge ordered them to do. There has to be some way of hauling them in contempt of court.

letget on February 18, 2011 at 1:07 PM

You know what’s really funny about this? I’ve got libtards telling me left-and-right that Judge Vinson’s Obamacare ruling isn’t binding because “the score is 2-2, and the Supreme Court hasn’t weighed in on it yet,” and yet Obama hasn’t done bupkis now that he’s been found in contempt and has court orders from more than one court with no contrary opinions to be found.

gryphon202 on February 18, 2011 at 1:17 PM

Expect BarryO and his minions at the EPA to rename ‘oil’ Toxic Waste, or somesuch nomenclature in order to reclassify it thereby requiring more environemental impact studies lasting years.

As you said, more tricks up their sleeves.

Meanwhile, back on dry land, many of the Gulf drillers that haven’t moved to foreign waters are poking holes in the ground Stateside in order to maintain production to local refineries, especially considering the high price per barrel. Although regulated, surface drilling has had a longer history to evolve safely and cleanly. This is the only good news coming out of this problem.

Robert17 on February 18, 2011 at 2:10 PM

Next week I am going offshore to a BP platform, but only for maintenance purposes. We have to go out there to keep everything from rusting and freezing up from inactivity. I don’t know when I will be going out to do a well completion or tie-in, but it sure is hurting me financially. I have been offshore only once for less than two weeks since I was involved in the new BOP installation on the Macondo #1 back in September.

DAT60A3 on February 18, 2011 at 10:39 PM


You know, it matters not at all that there are 2 judges that did not rule against the Obama administration, it isn’t a voting process. What matters is that ONE judge deemed it unconstitutional. You could have 8 federal judges that ruled is constitutional and 1 judge that ruled it not and the “not” means that everything (is supposed to) comes to a halt.

Right now, the Obama administration is behaving unconstitutionally by continuing with implementation, such as hiring IRS agents, in preparation.

Listen to some of Mark Levin’s shows (free, full episodes at –> Audio) from last week and he’ll explain it to you. He’s the real constitutional expert/lawyer, not DohBama.

Geministorm on February 20, 2011 at 2:32 AM

So, the governments Minerals Lands Leasing Act prescribes the share or royalty rate as 1/8 the value of production; for offshore leases, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act prescribes the royalty rate as 1/6 the value of production. Do the math to determine why it is O’s interest to keep royalty dollars from flowing into the treasury. Keep in mind that if it is in O’s interest, his interest is in milking the taxpayer. He is fabricating a need to milk the taxpayer.

ericdijon on February 20, 2011 at 6:44 PM

HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM
Top Pick

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Top Pick

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM


Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?