Chris Christie Vindicated on ARC Tunnel Cancellation

posted at 3:23 pm on February 8, 2011 by
[ Politicians ]   

Check out this clip of Chris Christie responding to heat he was getting on the ARC tunnel cancellation about two weeks ago:

Why is this news? Because as Daniel Foster at NRO notes, an entire generation has passed us by in three months. Here’s Christie himself responding to news of a new plan by Amtrak to build a tunnel across the Hudson into NYC:

There’s some dispute I’d say about how long a generation actually is, right? People say a generation, how long that is. In New Jersey as it applies to this a generation is three months. ARC is all a once-in-a-generation project.

All I said at the time were things that apparently were confirmed in the main by the press conference today. They’re advocating the Amtrak plan because they say that the feds should take the lead. I said the feds should take the lead if they thought the project was that important.

I said that it was a stupid idea to have a tunnel go to the basement of Macys, and on the whole, the Amtrak tunnel is going to go to an expanded Penn Station under the plan that I saw today.

Today, they touted this plan as ‘having better control over cost overruns.’ But the thing I find interesting about that is that these are the very same people who are saying months ago that I was fabricating the cost overruns. That they didn’t really exist. Someone better get to Chairman Wisniewski quickly so he can amend his talking points. Because now the Democratic United States Senators  are now saying that this project will have better control over cost overruns, that they were claiming months ago didn’t exist.

[...]

I hope all of you are taking note of all the dire predictions that were made and how wrong I was to have cancelled this. And now today the taxpayers of New Jersey are protected and you have real talk about a federal lead on a project that should have been a federal project all along and that if there are going to be contributions from the states, there are going to be contributions from all the states that benefit. Not just the State of New Jersey and its taxpayers which was the ARC plan. Sometimes, to make real change happen, you have to stand up and be counted and make the tough decisions and if I had been intimidated by all the rhetoric from all the folks who were shooting at us at the time, the taxpayers of New Jersey would be on the hook for untold billions of dollars.

I know there are a some on the right who scoff at Christie the You Tube phenom, but I hope the hype doesn’t obscure the substance. Christie keeps making these tough calls and, by my own admittedly biased score keeping, he’s getting nearly all of them right.

In the case of the ARC tunnel he took on three powerful Democratic Senators and most of the MSM over a principle of fiscal responsibility. After months of taking the heat, he has been totally vindicated, to the point where Sen. Schumer and others should be embarrassed for themselves. That’s not hype, that’s victory.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

They need the new tunnels — the current two tubes turn 100 next year and currently in rush hours carry one train evert two minutes. But the ARC plan Christie vetoed dead-ended at Macy’s, which meant the lines were of no use to anyone other than the people in New Jersey or New Yorkers with jobs or family in the northern NJ suburbs. The new option’s price tag makes is about the same, and is still one that may never get built, but at least the new tunnels can be used by trains traveling the entire Northeast corridor (and if they were smart they would make the new tunnels usable during overnight hours for through freight service from NYC and New England to the rest of the country, since the only freight rail connection right now is 150 miles north in Albany).

jon1979 on February 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM

Who is Chris Christie to tell Chuck Schumer, a U.S. Senator, to “mind his manners on the other side of the Hudson River.”

My dang hero, that’s who. And while Christie is at it, he should tell Chuckie Schumer to kiss his big old New Jersey Azz.

BigAlSouth on February 8, 2011 at 10:48 PM

“This time for sure, Rocky!”

{+_+}

herself on February 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM

herself on February 9, 2011 at 2:35 AM

“Now here’s something we hope you’ll really like!”

Dark-Star on February 9, 2011 at 11:00 AM

Christie should have said…

“There’s only one way to contain cost overruns on a Federal Government project… place liens on the assets of any Congressmen who vote to pass it, to cover any unexpected costs. But since I don’t believe Mr. Schumer has the stones or integrity to do something that responsible, I know he’s full of crap. I TRIPLE-DOG-DARE YOU TO PROVE ME WRONG MR. SCHUMER!

dominigan on February 9, 2011 at 2:24 PM

Where would I get a solid, objective review of Christie on basic issues? I’m asking because I really, REALLY, like his cajones on fiscal issues, but I see a lot of commentary about how he’s a centrist at best, except for the fiscal issues.

For me, the economy and fiscal responsibility and limiting government will be the priority issues of all coming elections, and Christie is looking damn good (yes, I know he says he isn’t running) Still, I do not know enough about him.

Help me out someone? A good resume look at Christie on issues, please@!

ace tomato on February 15, 2011 at 10:38 PM