The End of the Decade of the Public Sector

posted at 5:44 pm on January 24, 2011 by
[ Education ]   

The Bureau of Labor Statistics issued its annual dose of bad news on union membership. While 2010 was a bad year for everyone, it was a particularly bad year for unions.

There were 612,000 fewer union members in 2010 than there were in 2009 (which itself had a 770,000 member decline from 2008). To put that into some perspective, the entire economy lost only 417,000 jobs in 2010. Union market share of the total workforce fell below 12 percent, while its share of the private workforce fell below 7 percent.

Public sector unions lost members across the board. They are down 273,000 members though federal, state and local governments only lost 100,000 jobs. These figures and associated news stories about public pension costs have prompted many on the left (including The Progressive, Mother Jones and Counterpunch) to declare it a “war on public sector workers.”

As much as I want to avoid mimicking such vitriolic language, the current situation isn’t as much a “war” as it is an insurrection after years of occupation. You have to engage in selective historical amnesia to paint public sector unions as victims.

In 2000, America employed about the same number of people in the private sector as it does now (102.8 million vs. 103 million). But during the last decade, most of which featured a Republican U.S. President and several years of GOP control of Congress, the number of public sector workers increased by 1.8 million.

In the 2000s, private sector unions lost more than 2.1 million members, while public sector unions added 508,000 members.

In other words, during a decade in which the private sector workforce increased a paltry 0.2 percent, the public sector workforce increased 9.2 percent. While private sector union membership declined 23.1 percent, public sector union membership rose 7.1 percent.

America has become an almost entirely non-union economy governed by a highly unionized political bureaucracy – essentially the opposite of the situation in the Fifties. Economic changes reduced the clout of the private sector unions. Only political changes can reduce the clout of the public sector unions.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Now if the “teachers, firemen, and policemen will be terminated and leave your city vulnerable” meme gets attacked will we be able to introduce intelligence into the discussion.

In my suburban SF Bay Area town, the librarians wore SEIU buttons last year while they were negotiating with the city. What hazardous conditions are they working under? Evicting noisy teenagers? Rousing a couple of homeless people? If it’s really hazardous, they call the police.

In the meantime, the dumb citizens of this town voted to increase the sales tax by .25% for 8 YEARS for a 1 YEAR shortfall. My total sales taxes are 9.75% on every purchase because politicians and citizens can’t say “no.”

I can’t wait for public sector unions to start losing membership. Please start here.

norcalgal on January 24, 2011 at 7:14 PM

In the meantime, the dumb citizens of this town voted to increase the sales tax by .25% for 8 YEARS for a 1 YEAR shortfall. My total sales taxes are 9.75% on every purchase because politicians and citizens can’t say “no.”

Yeeowch! And I thought 7% was bad!

My sympathies.

Dark-Star on January 25, 2011 at 11:44 AM

In my suburban SF Bay Area town, the librarians wore SEIU buttons last year while they were negotiating with the city.
norcalgal

They wore BUTTONS??!!!

One can only hope that the Pinkertons clubbed the libraiarians with vigor, if not ferocity. Such impertinence borders on anarchism.

audiculous on January 25, 2011 at 10:00 PM