Green Room

111th Congress: Worst ever?

posted at 7:50 am on December 21, 2010 by

Historians may argue, but there’s much to support a case for the affirmative. Frank Donatelli reviews the power-mad exploits of this outgoing band of despots. Among them:

$800 billion “stimulus”

Why take any time to study the contents when you know exactly what to do? The problem was that most of the money went to states to preserve the jobs of government workers. Some stimulus. The president said it would keep unemployment at 8 percent. It is now near 10 percent.

Cap and trade: Passed by the shameless House only, this monster would have extended the long, sticky, grasping fingers of government into every aspect of American life and business, with very destructive results. Mr. Donatelli:

The goal of the 111th Congress all along was to quietly increase taxes to pay for this spending spree. That was the hidden goal of climate-change legislation. The original bill envisioned massive new taxes in the tens of billions on carbon emissions from industrial concerns. When that failed, more than one member of the 111th Congress was prepared to support a value-added tax (VAT), which was to have been sold as the only alternative to federal bankruptcy.

We noted at the time:

Even if you set aside the following –

– the provisions in this bill would impose an extreme, unprecedented level of micromanagement and control over our everyday lives.

This disastrous bill served to tip Americans off to the really nefarious  intentions of this Congress.

Cash for Clunkers, one of the most transparently stupid, sinfully wasteful government programs ever:

Which disrupted the used-car market, mandated destruction of perfectly usable older vehicles and subsidized purchases of autos, most of which would have been purchased in any case.

Health care reform, the 111th’s greatest accomplishment, so wonderful that members tried very hard not to mention it during the 2010 campaign. Rammed through, by whatever means necessary, against the clear will of the people, and always more about massively expanding government power than about “fixing” “health care.” Most likely unconstitutional, not that the 111th cared.

What they cared about was aggregation of power.

Financial regulations bill, brought to you by Sen. Chris Dodd and Rep. Barney Frank, which tells you all you really need to know. Ed Morrissey:

Expect more fees on more transactions, including paying premium prices for doing business face to face with bank tellers and other employees.  Banks will start demanding higher minimum balances and start charging higher fees on accounts that don’t make the cut.  Bank of America will lose between $7 and $10 billion just on charges for debit and credit cards alone, money that will get made up by its customers somewhere.

Consumers may not pay the entire price, however, at least not directly.  If you like your local branch, better get used to the idea that it may disappear.  With billions of dollars in new costs landing with a thud on their balance sheets, we can expect to see branches close up entirely — and the jobs that exist disappear along with them.

Et cetera.

Lame duck session
If anyone had any doubt of the 111th’s utter contempt for the people they were supposed to represent, their final, power-drunken lurch during the lame duck session made it nakedly apparent. Congress’s attempt to force another massive, unread, pork-laden bill down America’s throat, in the face of November 2nd’s resounding repudiation of just that, was a new low for this Congress. Ever shameless, Senate Democrats proudly list their “accomplishments” here. They richly deserve some form of special recognition for their service.

So get ready to wave bye-bye (or substitute hand gesture of your choice) to the Infamous 111th. We pray to God we won’t see its like again soon.

Cross-posted at P&P.

Most recent posts here.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

We pray to God we won’t see its like again soon.

amen

cmsinaz on December 21, 2010 at 8:22 AM

Audiculous to chime in on why this article is horrifically wrong in

5…

4…

3…

2…

1…

gryphon202 on December 21, 2010 at 10:50 AM

Financial regulations bill, brought to you by Sens. Chris Dodd and Barney Frank,

Minor quibble here: Frank is a Rep not a Sen.

sirnapsalot on December 21, 2010 at 12:18 PM

Oops. I knew that. Thanks. Correcting.

Pundette on December 21, 2010 at 3:56 PM

The use of a lame duck session to maneuver votes on major legislation without adequate public disclosure and discussion might be the most egregious assault on the democratic process that I have witnessed in my life.
I feel that the GOP lawmakers are at fault for not pushing back harder and for not drawing more public attention to the abuse in process. The old congressional ‘wisdom’ of going along to get along borders on treason under such circumstances.

snaggletoothie on December 21, 2010 at 5:07 PM

A Series of Unfortunate Events: The 111th Congress

crosspatch on December 22, 2010 at 12:07 AM

Is this a question?

Cylor on December 22, 2010 at 6:54 AM