Green Room

The Latest National Security Threat: Childhood Obesity

posted at 5:14 pm on December 13, 2010 by

In her war on childhood obesity, which culminated today with the president signing the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 into law, First Lady Michelle Obama has done and said some questionable things.

One of the most objectionable was her use of strong arm tactics to “persuade” manufacturers of empty-calorie foods to go on “an advertising diet,” adding that if they didn’t “come along peaceably,” she might use her clout to force the FCC to implement new rules on commercials in children’s programming. Another was peppering the White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity Report to the President with skewed data to make it seem as though the obesity problem in America is worse than it is.

But arguably nothing has been as disingenuous as her comments today, which included the observation that

when more than one in four young people are unqualified for military service because of their weight, childhood obesity isn’t just a public health threat, it’s not just an economic threat, it’s a national security threat as well.

One might well wonder in what way childhood obesity could be construed as a threat to national security. It might be if everyone in the nation were conscripted into military service as a matter of course, but we haven’t had a compulsory draft since 1973. In addition, there are currently 75.2 million children living in the U.S., judging from the best available data. As of September 30, 2010, there were 1.4 million Americans on active duty in the military with another 850,000 on standby in the seven reserve components. Combined, those numbers come to 2.25 million, which means that discounting the “one in four”—or 18.8 million—American children who are obese leaves a pool of 56.4 million able-bodied future volunteers.

The bottom line is that, save for a smattering of concerns that have been voiced over the possibility that the new law will strain school budgets, the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act has enjoyed broad bipartisan support. Attempting to curb childhood obesity is a goal one would be hard-pressed to quibble with regardless of political persuasion. Why the First Lady has seen fit to make idiotic statements like the one she did today to sell this idea is the big mystery.

Related Article

Cross-posted at Libertarian Examiner. Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

This is from a woman who doesn’t even raise her own kids. She has a granny/nanny relative who does the day to day duties while she just takes them on vacations paid for by the tax payers. Who elected her to run our child raising business for us?

Kissmygrits on December 13, 2010 at 7:09 PM

Kissmygrits, no one elected her, who cares whether she’s got a career and has help raising her kids, and why would it bother a sane person that she’s speaking out against obesity?

Not even Mr Portnoy thinks that obesity isn’t a serious problem, one that is increasingly common in this country, or a problem that can be countered by publicity and education.

audiculous on December 13, 2010 at 8:16 PM

Kissmygrits, no one elected her, who cares whether she’s got a career and has help raising her kids, and why would it bother a sane person that she’s speaking out against obesity?

Not even Mr Portnoy thinks that obesity isn’t a serious problem, one that is increasingly common in this country, or a problem that can be countered by publicity and education.

audiculous on December 13, 2010 at 8:16 PM

Mr. diculus,
I agree one hunnit pacent. No one should be shoving a microphone in front of her to record her musings on anything.

A silent FLOTUS is the best FLOTUS.

Inanemergencydial on December 14, 2010 at 8:47 AM

Why the First Lady has seen fit to make idiotic statements like the one she did today to sell this idea is the big mystery.

Because National Security threats allow the government to do things not normally allowed by the law or Constitution. For instance, normally the federal government can’t prohibit speech, but when it comes to National Security issues (say location & movement of troops) it can (and I have no problem with that.)

So by framing what we eat, and how it is promoted (through the free speech of advertising) as a National Security issue, Michelle gets a run around of that pesky First Amendment that the Left hates.

rbj on December 14, 2010 at 9:57 AM

Inane emerger,

people do stick mikes in front of her, just as they’ve done with the other First Ladies, and beyond a little hyperbole, there’s not a thing wrong with what she’s saying about trying to prevent any increase in the number of our children becoming obese.

audiculous on December 14, 2010 at 3:45 PM

This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.

Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.

Ed Morrissey on December 15, 2010 at 3:10 PM