Green Room

Food Police Ban New Fast Food Restaurants in South L.A.

posted at 3:22 pm on December 11, 2010 by

The road to hell, famous for being paved with good intentions, has been diverted to run through South Los Angeles. This past week, the L.A. City Council voted to ban new stand-alone fast food restaurants from opening within half a mile of one another in that community.

South L.A., should the name fail to register, used to be called “South Central.” It was a handle that carried the unfortunate connotations of urban decay and street crime. The gang violence and poverty that were woven into the fabric of daily life were memorialized in rap songs and movies such as Ice Cube’s Dead Homiez.

But the City Council strove to change all that in 2003. The community that had spawned the Bloods and the Crips was given a new name and, it was hoped, a sanitized image. And while the city elders stopped short of erecting billboards with the message “Come Vacation in Scenic South L.A.,” they did make inroads into altering the neighborhood’s bad rep, revitalizing sections of the sprawling community.

And now the City Council has taken another step toward saving South L.A. from itself by saying no to more fast food on behalf of its constituents. Citing the statistic that 70 percent of food currently sold in the community is “fast,” Councilmember Jan Perry defended the ban, stating:

This is not an attempt to control people as to what they can put into their mouths. This is an attempt to diversify their food options.

But to the disinterested observer it appears that controlling what people “put into their mouths” is precisely what the City Council is doing.

Apart from the nanny-state tactics implicit in this proposal, the ordinance itself creates two legal problems. One relates to the notion of free enterprise, the other to the laws of supply and demand.

With respect to free enterprise, the City Council is intruding into any would-be fast food franchisee’s constitutional right to open a business wherever he chooses, provided it doesn’t interfere with local zoning laws. Councilwoman Perry’s own comments reveal that commercial zoning laws are not what’s at issue:

When we talk to our community members and the people that we were elected to represent, the one thing that we hear over and over and over again is: ‘We need more grocery stores, we need more restaurants, we need more choices, we are tired of the choices that have been given to this community.’

In short, businesses—including restaurants—are welcome, even desired, by residents of the community.

As to supply and demand, the residents of South L.A. can complain all they want about the “choices that have been given to this community” and wish for alternatives to fast food. Unless the City Council can devise a method for forcing investors to open eateries with tablecloths and waiters, the locals will simply have to make do with the hand they have been dealt or cook at home.

In addition, the fact that more fast food franchisees are seeking to open restaurants in South L.A. despite the ostensible over-saturation of that market suggests that fast food is what many South Angelinos want. What business is it of the City Council to tell them they can’t have it?

Related Articles

Cross-posted at Libertarian Examiner. Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can reach me at [email protected] or by posting a comment below.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Perhaps it’s a matter of the food quality, what with FLOTUS’ desire to reduce “fast food obesity”.

Maybe a fast food “Bamboo Shoots R Us” store is more what the city council is striving for, what with infinite wisdom and all.

Or perhaps cooking hamburgers and tacos slowly is the recipe? At least they don’t have a Bloomburg banning salt. Yet.

Robert17 on December 11, 2010 at 6:02 PM

Dear Mr Portnoy,

Thank you for this. I agree that the LA City Council is wrong and I applaud you for including the link to the ordinance.

Good one.

audiculous on December 11, 2010 at 6:18 PM

Face it, fast food is, for the most part, cheap, greasy and good-tasting. That’s why people eat it. We all know it’s bad for you when eaten too often. On the other hand, McDonalds and Wendy’s offer salads, diet soft drinks and water, so it’s not as though they’re forcing Big Macs and Baconators down the throats of the customer. People who don’t care about their health are gonna eat the crap anyway. All you’ll do with these stupid laws is make them drive a little farther to get the specialty they want.

tpitman on December 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM
Top Pick

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands it a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”

Trump: I never made any recordings of Comey

Allahpundit Jun 22, 2017 2:01 PM

Bluff.

Hackers stole private data from election databases

John Sexton Jun 22, 2017 1:21 PM

“90,000 records stolen by Russian state actors contained drivers license numbers”

Failure to protect the city

Big man on the Middle Eastern campus

Biased Americans see media as biased.

Tough times down on the liberal ranch

Will Nancy Pelosi survive this latest Dem disaster?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 22, 2017 8:41 AM

Eat quick, before it’s gone.

Slow your roll, boss

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?

“If we do nothing, more companies will back out and more people will lose coverage.”

You know, I may have cracked the case for you, guys

“They’re still running against her and still winning races.”

“…the suspect is from Quebec and has a Canadian passport.”

When the Left lost their way on immigration

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 2:41 PM

It wasn’t all that long ago, really

“I personally watched some of these students go up to Chief Brown, right up to her face, and call her all kinds of names, cursing at her.”

Did the Queen “nix” a Trump visit to London?

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 12:41 PM

More like wishful thinking on the American left

Sometimes it’s hard. This was the hardest part