The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Strikes Again
posted at 9:00 pm on October 26, 2010 by Cassy Fiano
[ Elections ]
The infamous 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has made yet another controversial decision, with Justice Sandra Day O’Connor sitting in. This time, they overturned Arizona’s requirement that voters show proof of citizenship before voting.
Hey, we gotta make voting easier for those illegal aliens somehow!
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned Arizona’s requirement that people show proof of citizenship to register to vote.
The split decision by a three-judge panel determined that the requirement to show proof of citizenship — passed by voters in 2004 — is not consistent with the National Voter Registration Act.
Associate Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, temporarily sitting by designation, and Circuit Judge Sandra Ikuta, with chief judge Alex Kozinski dissenting, said Prop. 200 creates an additional hurdle, while the national act is intended to reduce “state-imposed obstacles” to registration.
The majority noted that Congress was well aware of the problem of voter fraud when it passed the voter act, and built in sufficient protections, including applying perjury penalties to applicants who lie about their eligibilty.
Yeah, there’s all this voter fraud and stuff, and voters already decided that this was what they wanted, but we’ll just overturn it anyways! Heck, why should only US citizens get to vote? Illegal alien votes would bring in so many more votes for Democrats, after all.
As Michelle Malkin points out, the Obama Department of Social Justice has been trying to keep states from ensuring that only US citizens vote in our elections. But this is a whole new degree of insanity. What we have here is judges that used the bench to endorse and facilitate voter fraud. It’s absolutely outrageous — and unfortunately, not surprising in the least.
–
Follow Cassy on Twitter and read more of her work at CassyFiano.com and Hard Corps Wife.









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
It no longer a government for the people. We have to take it back.
GardenGnome on October 26, 2010 at 10:21 PM
had to do a double take on that one…
unstinkingbelievable…
cmsinaz on October 26, 2010 at 11:05 PM
These traitors to our country and its most sacred values must believe that sovereignty is a dirty word.
hillbillyjim on October 27, 2010 at 2:51 AM
Next thing you know, Arizona will require you to be alive to vote. And even actually exist.
rbj on October 27, 2010 at 9:40 AM
Note: Article 4, Section 3 of the US Constitution guarantees each state a “Republican Form of Government”. This courts ruling is not in harmony with the US Constitution.
purpleslog on October 27, 2010 at 9:58 AM
Well, I don’t actually LIVE in Arizona. Well, actually, I’ve never BEEN to Arizona. But I did actually FLY OVER Arizona one time in 1968. And I REALLY, REALLY, REALLY, want to see the Grand Canyon. So then, does that qualify me to vote in Arizona?
oldleprechaun on October 27, 2010 at 12:02 PM
These lib judges love messing with election law, should be an impeaching.
joeindc44 on October 27, 2010 at 1:25 PM
Can somebody please dissolve the 9th Circuit Court? Please?
creekspecter on October 27, 2010 at 8:46 PM
The 9th Circuit Retirement Castle is the place Supreme Court Justices go once they develop Senile Dementia
Jack Bauer on October 28, 2010 at 3:30 AM