Green Room

The Anti-Women Left Falls Back On Sexual Slurs And Dehumanization

posted at 11:44 pm on October 8, 2010 by

Originally posted at David Horowitz’s NewsReal

Last week, I attended the Smart Girl Summit in Washington, D.C.  The conference was filled with women of strength, of brains, of beauty and of fierce resolve.  Women from all walks of life who came together, fighting and trying to do what is best for their children and this country.  But, I was struck by something else; to the Left, these women are either whores or some creepy new invention of faux women, worthy of only mocking and ridicule.

Many told of times where they had been, like I have, called “gender traitors” or not real women. I’ve been called a dumb tart, just a rack, and told “I have better meat for her mouth.” I’ve been accused of being a wholly owned subsidiary of male dominated culture, whatever that means. We dumb tarts can’t seem to figure out things like that.

Every woman I met laughed such things off. That part didn’t shock me. See, we don’t relish victim-hood. We are also secure and comfortable in our own skins, breasts and fancy wombs and all. But, another reason it is laughed off did bother me. Because we are “used to it.”  The thing is, we shouldn’t be. It shouldn’t be happening. Yet, it does. Over and over.

Kirsten Powers attended the panel I was on, called Feminism 2.0, the New Face of Feminism, with Jenn Q. Public and Pamela Gorman, moderated by Adrienne Royer. While Kirsten is an unabashed liberal and likely disagrees with us on most policy points, she listened and understood the vile hatred toward conservative women that comes out of the Left. Her article at the Daily Beast today reflects that. She touched on some examples, including the most recent one whereby Jerry Brown called Meg Whitman “a whore.”  She’s a dame, you see. Thus, anything concerning financial things, which women can’t possibly understand, is whore-y. Am I right, fellas?

Jerry Brown isn’t alone. And it isn’t just coming from men. Alleged feminists are some of the worst offenders, spewing sexist and outright misogynistic garbage at conservative women. Because, abortion. They have grossly tied up equality and “women’s rights” with a legal ability to kill your unborn children. Killing the unborn is a cause to them and women who dare to challenge them by pointing out the vile nature of such a thing must be gender traitors or dehumanized in any way possible. Kirsten Powers notes the following:

While we, sadly, are all too familiar with the casual misogynistic comment, what perhaps is more surprising is where these slurs lately have been coming from—progressive bastions like the Brown camp, and liberal women.

Last month, liberal talk show host Stephanie Miller laughed uproariously when a female guest on her show said that if she ever met Michelle Malkin, “I would kick [her] right in the nuts,” and warned, “Wear a cup, lady.”

Nice, huh? Stay classy, femisogynists! My only quibble is that it’s not surprising at all. The past year alone has shown that.

Gloria Steinem recently said conservative women cannot be Feminists. Cannot. Why? Because you are anti-woman if you are pro-life. Many other faux-feminists, or femisogynists, have been flapping their soy-drinking gums with outrageous, and shrieking, outrage in a similar vein. “Oh noes!” they say “Conservative women are trying to steal Feminism! They can’t be feminists. They are icky!” Um. Selective support for only “the right kind” of woman and slamming the doors you claim to open right in their faces is antithetical to actual feminism. Shatter that glass ceiling, but only if you do it by walking in lock-step with us!

Tina Brown, also from The Daily Beast, called GOP women winning some primaries “a blow to feminism”. You know, because they are meany pants and have cooties or something. Not real women.

But, actually, the only trouble with this one is, it almost feels as if all these women winning are kind of a blow to feminism. Because, each one of them, really, most of them, are, you know, very much, uh, uh, you know, against so many of things that women have fought for such a long time.

Yeah, no. They don’t fight against what I want and I happen to be a broad, Miss Brown. I also don’t think women are stupid and, therefore, should only focus on made-up, busy work issues like the nebulous “reproductive rights” and pyramid scheme, faux- environmental issues like the Left wants them to do. She then went onto say that it was even worse because they were rich women. Oh, well, rich women. They must not have enough estrogen or something. How could women be rich? That’s for boys!

This summer, a Democrat Congresswoman, Rep. Janis Sontany (D-TN) said about her Republican counterparts ““You have to lift their skirts to find out if they are women. You sure can’t find out by how they vote!” They can’t have girly bits, you see. If they were real women, they wouldn’t have strayed off the Democrat plantation! Somehow the idea that we only dress as women is a biggie with the Left. Trying to black-ball us from their exclusive, and kinda creepy, Stepford-Feminist club isn’t enough, you see. They have to try to dehumanize us to the point where even our gender is taken away from us. An article at Alternet said:

Sarah Palin’s Mama Grizzlies are merely the latest incarnation of the anti-women’s movement — a movement to oppose real solutions for women, dressed up in a skirt and lipstick, as if to legitimize their efforts to block progress.

The ever bitter and idiotic Eleanor Clift called Sarah Palin “Pat Buchanan in drag”. Salon said Sarah Palin “may be a lady, but she ain’t no woman.” Patricia Ireland of the National Organization of Women (should have “only our kind of” in front of Women) told Democrats to vote only for “authentic” female political candidates. And Naomi Wolf once said that Jeane Kilpatrick was “uninflected by the experiences of the female body.” To the Left, we are either not real women or we are whores, conservative porn, or sex objects with no brains because a woman can’t possibly have both. The response to the Citzen’s United movie about conservative women, Fire From the Heartland, put that on full and disgusting display.

Enough. We won’t take it lying down, despite the fact that Jerry Brown apparently believes we spend all our time on our backs.

So, no. I refuse to be “used to it.” And the Left should take note and remember that old adage about hell, scorned women and fury. Please do say hello to the scorned come November.


Cross-posted from NewsReal

Follow Lori  on Twitter and read more of her work at Snark and Boobs Red State and Human Events.

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


You have made one crucial mistake Lori and as a man I feel obliged to point it out:

These people on the left are not misogynists (or not merely, though I am using the broader definition).

They are misandrists. They hate ALL humanity, regardless of gender, if it doesn’t match up to their perfect political utopian vision. Sadly, there isn’t really a more vile sounding way to point out misandry than the word itself. They may say they’re all for “The People,” it’s just human beings they can’t abide by.

Now perhaps my values are just old fashioned, but I had always believed a woman’s ability to give life was a gift from God (though the harpies dispise the notion of God as well). So it’s completely antithetical to reason that turning the womb into a place of death instead of a place of life is at all desirable.

Of course perhaps you’ll agree with me on this Lori: Just look at the men these liberal feminists hang around with. The few that aren’t effete, toothless, declawed, and pistol-whipped are at the other end of the spectrum at full blown womanizer, and the femmes are more than happy to ride their coattails then claim they did it their way. There don’t seem to be any liberal men that have what I call a “ferocious virtue,” a killer instinct that roots out injustice instead of aiding and abetting it. Real men don’t abide such degrading insult to any woman, whether they agree with their politics or not. That being said I do like to employ “harpies” to describe these women because they are willing to rend flesh and blood and gloss over it with a euphemism called “choice.”

The worst of it is these women believe they’re somehow on an equal playing field with men when really all they have done is taken the most terrible stereotypical excesses of our gender and made that the entirety of their personality. Then when the genuine article calls them out on it they fall back on their permanent victim status whine-fest. Truly revolting. Don’t bring a mewl to a roaring contest.

BKennedy on October 9, 2010 at 5:13 AM

These supposedly broad-minded, tolerant liberals simply can’t stand people who explode their stereotypes.

Conservatives are supposed to be old white businessmen. Women are supposed to be bra-burning, abortion-demanding, equal-pay-achieving whatevers. The Left has deliberately attempted over decades to paint conservatives into a smaller and smaller corner so we are a permanent and small minority of white middle-aged men. Any challenge to that is going to be met with the vilest rhetoric imaginable, because it threatens the majority they think they have. They can’t win on an even playing field of ideas and actual results of their policy preferences.

It’s especially hilarious to me watching the reaction of l.iberals to Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina. These two women are absolute trailblazers in the business world, the sort that old-line feminists like Gloria Steinem used to dream would be running the world, or at least co-running it, someday. But now they are called whores and trash, because they dare challenge the liberal establishment in California.

rockmom on October 9, 2010 at 8:43 AM

So, no. I refuse to be “used to it.” And the Left should take note and remember that old adage about hell, scorned women and fury. Please do say hello to the scorned come November.

Good for you.

Cylor on October 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM

If they were real women, they wouldn’t have strayed off the Democrat plantation! out of the Democratic kitchen!


agmartin on October 9, 2010 at 1:01 PM

This post has been promoted to

Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.

Allahpundit on October 9, 2010 at 5:59 PM