Green Room

Migra, Migra!

posted at 2:45 pm on October 1, 2010 by

Anent the story which the California (and national!) media have siezed upon to try to derail Meg Whitman’s campaign for governor in California…

Four facts appear undisputed:

  1. In 2000, Whitman used an employment agency to hire a housekeeper, Nicandra “Nicky” Diaz Santillan, at $23 per hour.
  2. Santillan had earlier presented the agency with a California driver’s license and Social Security card, copies of which the agency provided Whitman.
  3. Those documents were in fact fraudulent — they belonged to one of Santilan’s sisters who lived in San Francisco.
  4. In 2009, Santillan disclosed to Whitman that she was an illegal immigrant and that the papers she had shown to Whitman were fraudulent; at that point, Whitman let her go, as the law requires.

A couple of days ago, grandstanding liberal activist attorney Gloria Allred — who has donated money to Jerry Brown, Whitman’s opponent in the gubernatorial race and an ancient relic of an earlier, loonier time in California history — called a press conference to announce that she was representing Santillan (in what action?), whom she calls her “client.” She triumphantly announced all of the above points, including that Santillan was in the country illegally and had used fraudulent documentation to get herself hired by Whitman. (I’m not sure how this helps her client, unless her real client is Jerry Brown.)

Allred also produced a 2003 letter to Whitman and her husband, Griffith Rutherford Harsh IV, from the Social Security Administration… not from the Immigration and Naturalization Service, as it was called then. The letter “raised discrepancies” about Santillan’s documents, which even AP says was only “a possible tip-off that she could be in the U.S. illegally.”

In fact, as Whizbang reports, the Social Security letter was about retirement and disability insurance… and the only reference it made to immigration was to forcefully note that nothing in the letter should be used to infer Santillan’s immigration status!

The letter is posted in its entirety at TZM Documents, and it includes this paragraph:

This letter does not imply that you or your employee intentionally provided incorrect information about the employee’s name or SSN. It is not a basis, in and of itself, for you to take any adverse action against the employee, such as laying off, suspending, firing, or discriminating against the individual. Any employer that uses the information in this letter to justify taking adverse action against an employee may violate state or federal law and be subject to legal consequences. Moreover, this letter makes no statement about your employee’s immigration status.


Allred argues that the letter constituted absolute evidence that Santillan was in the country illegally… and that Whitman must somehow have known about it and realized she was employing an illegal all the way back in 2003.

My problem with this hit job is simple: Can somebody please tell me exactly what charge Gloria Allred is leveling at Whitman? I know this can’t be right, but it seems for all the world as if Allred — liberal activist, immigration activist, and feminist activist — accuses Whitman of failing to harm Allred’s client in a timely manner.

Whitman didn’t fire Santillan in 2003 on the basis of a simple inquiry letter from the SSA — a letter which threatens “legal consequences” against anyone using that letter as the basis of “laying off, suspending, firing, or discriminating against the individual.” Instead, she waited until Santillan actually informed her she was illegal. Only then did Whitman reluctantly fire her longtime friend and housekeeper, as the law requires.

Am I misunderstanding this? Is Allred’s attack on Whitman really that the gubernatorial candidate failed to jump to conclusions, failed to violate state and federal law, and failed to fire the woman at the first conceivable opportunity, only doing so when she had actual proof that Nicky Diaz Santillan had defrauded her and was breaking the law?

(And suppose Whitman had fired Santillan back in 2003; would that, then, form the basis of Allred’s attack… that Whitman broke the law by discriminating against her friend and employee without any solid evidence of illegality?)

More bizarreness:

One of the state’s largest public employee unions immediately released a Spanish-language attack ad accusing Whitman of a double standard on illegal immigration.

You mean… one standard for businesses, which requires them actually to investigate the residency status of their employees — and another standard for individuals, which requires only that they not knowingly hire illegals? That’s the “double standard” that outrages the Hispanic community in California?

What would they prefer? A mandate that even private individuals hiring maids, nannies, and housekeepers launch full-scale investigations and background checks to determine who is here legally? I suspect the natural response to such a draconian requirement would be not to hire anyone at all, but simply to make do without.

Somehow I’m not getting the point of this entire hit piece. It appears that an ultra-liberal Jerry Brown surrogate, Gloria Allred, is charging Meg Whitman with failing to racially discriminate against Santillan.

Cross-posted on Big Lizards

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Stop hurting the meme with common sense!!

To be fair, I think everyone except Gloria Alred has figured out that the only one who did any wrong here is the housekeeper herself.

uknowmorethanme on October 1, 2010 at 3:06 PM

Where is Malkin and these angry “conservatives” who secretly want mass deportation by attrition?

we need a reasonable solution to all of this mess…

conservador on October 1, 2010 at 3:35 PM

Actually, Malkin is with Jerry Brown and Gloria Allred on this: by not firing the wetback immediately and opening herself up to Federal discrimination charges, Whitman should withdraw immediately.

SDN on October 1, 2010 at 4:09 PM

SDN, there you are! Whitman will win and will going on to shut people up like you who are too afraid to just admit your a mass deportation by attrition type. Thank God, real conservative leaders are stepping up to solve the problem.

conservador on October 1, 2010 at 5:02 PM

And, when will Nicky either be deported or go to jail? The evidence clearly shows Nicky was in violation of several laws.

EliTheBean on October 1, 2010 at 5:03 PM

Shut me up? You and what army. I’m actually a mass deportation, period type, but if attrition works, that’s cool.

What part of illegal immigrant isn’t clear? And as for Whitman, I think she ought to ask Malkin, Allred, etc. when we started prosecuting fraud victims, especially when the letter she got specifically states that doing anything to the poor little criminal who deceived her opens her up to civil rights violation charges.

SDN on October 1, 2010 at 10:07 PM

The reasonable solution is enforcement of immigration law. Yes to legal immigrants, we decide the number, and the process.

No to illegal immigrants. Deport, Attrit, however you do it, just enforce the laws.

rightwingyahooo on October 3, 2010 at 3:25 AM

Actually, businesses are not required to investigate their employees. They are required to complete Form I-9 and view the documents presented by the employee. That is all. If they get a no match letter, the employer is only required to verify the correctness of information provided by the employee. No other action at all. Except perhaps for checking their own records of the employees information for accuracy.

federale86 on October 4, 2010 at 2:16 PM