Lessons from Delaware: Establishment Republicans are just as bad as the Democrats

posted at 10:42 am on September 15, 2010 by
[ Elections ]   

Last night, as conservatives predicted and establishment Republicans feared, Christine O’Donnell defeated Mike Castle in Delaware’s GOP primary. And predictably, establishment Republicans are throwing a gigantic temper tantrum in response. Mike Castle is refusing to endorse O’Donnell. Karl Rove is bitterly complaining (video here), pointing out inanities to try to discredit her like… the “fact” that she took too long to pay off her college bills? (Um, hate to point it out to you Karl, but I think there’s a lot of Americans who can sympathize with that.) It’s been rumored that the NRSC is refusing to back her. And the GOP is blaming her win for losing the chance to take back the Senate in November… although, as Ed Morrissey points out, just last week they were trying to keep expectations of taking back the House (let alone the Senate!) down.

Like I said, the GOP establishment is throwing a giant temper tantrum. And it’s quite frankly disgusting.

There’s a lesson to be learned here. And the lesson is that the establishment Republicans are by and large no better than the Democrats. Karl Rove got one thing right, and it’s applicable to most of the RINOs getting voted out of office right now: voters last night were voting more against Mike Castle’s liberal voting record (cap and trade, DISCLOSE) than they were voting for Christine O’Donnell. And that’s exactly the point. Politicians in Washington have become completely infatuated with the power they think they hold. Instead of seeing themselves for what they are — public servants elected by their constituents — they have gotten this deluded notion into their heads that they own the seats they hold in Congress, regardless of whether voters still want them there or not. Arlen Specter switched parties, Charlie Crist is running as an independent and bashing GOP principles he claimed to hold just months ago, Lisa Murkowski is debating a write-in campaign, and Mike Castle is refusing to back Christine O’Donnell. What will it take for them to get the message that WE make the decision? Voters are the ones who choose who they want to represent them, not the beltway establishment. We don’t make the choice that the NRSC wants us to make, and the NRSC sulks.

The establishment talking point is that O’Donnell cannot win in Delaware because she is too extreme. Well, that may very well be true. But she’d have a much better chance if the establishment would rally behind her than if they played right into the hands of the Democrats. And that’s what they’re doing right now. If Mike Castle had won last night, conservatives would have grudgingly held their noses and stood behind him in order to keep the Democrats from keeping another seat in the Senate. When the situation is reversed, there’s no such sense of unity from the GOP establishment. It’s all take for them and no give, and voters are fed up.

For years, Republicans in Congress have gotten selfish and lazy. They ignored what their constituents wanted from them, they got tone-deaf, and they turned themselves into the Democrat-lite party. Conservative principles? There’s no home for them right now in the Republican party, and so Republican voters are forcing a change. They’re bringing in new blood and they’re sending a message to the RINOs left standing: adapt or die. If voters wanted spend-happy fat cats that are indistinguishable from Democrats, they would have voted Mike Castle in again. Charlie Crist wouldn’t have been trailing Marco Rubio in all of the polls. Arlen Specter wouldn’t have had to leave the party with his tail tucked between his legs. Voters have spoken, they’re making their voices heard, and Republicans are angry about it. What does that tell you?

This is about much more than just Christine O’Donnell. This is a fight for the soul of the Republican party. This election season has shown that there is a change coming, like it or not, and the response from the GOP has said everything that needs to be said. The GOP doesn’t respect their constituents anymore than the Democrats do. These primaries aren’t just anti-Democrat, although Democrats will inevitably take the worst of it. It’s anti-incumbent, because most of the incumbents have come to see themselves as some sort of holier-than-thou royalty who deserves a seat in Congress for life. They act in their own interests only, regardless of what is best for the country or what voters want, and Democrats do not have a monopoly on that. Establishment Republicans are just as bad, and voters are fed up.

A change is coming. The lesson to Republicans is clear. Will they be willing to learn and change? If not, the purge will just keep coming. Adapt or die.

—–

Follow Cassy on Twitter and read more of her work at CassyFiano.com and Hard Corps Wife.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Very well said Cassy! The rnc and nrnc will have a really hard time getting funds from people with their actions. We give to the candidate who has our values. These good ole boy/gal r’s better wake up. They are about to find themselves in the unemployment line.
L

letget on September 15, 2010 at 10:57 AM

Seems the establishment R’s suffer from the same disease as the libs. They can’t hear us, or don’t want to. We have a big tent if they want to join us. The tug of power in their grasp must be mighty strong.

Kissmygrits on September 15, 2010 at 11:09 AM

Great post – well stated, Cassy. I agree 100%.

wright on September 15, 2010 at 11:13 AM

Which is the real takeaway: the ‘TEA Party’ (read ‘true’ or more conservative) candidates can and do win – and win now with some real strength.

The GOP needs to read the writing on the wall and start offering more of these candidates, grooming more of them and supporting them instead of constantly infighting.

Its time to establish a new ‘Establishment’.

catmman on September 15, 2010 at 11:22 AM

This has been said many times before but it needs to be said again.

DO NOT DONATE TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY in any way, shape, or form.

GIVE and VOLUNTEER DIRECTLY TO THE CANDIDATE of your choice.

The GOP has demonstrated they are just as good at wasting your money as the Demonrats.

We are AMERICANS. We are not serfs.

We will make our own decisions, thank you very much.

Ace ODale on September 15, 2010 at 11:25 AM

If the GOP refuses to be dragged (kicking and screaming) back to the right, then we’ll abandon it. It’s really that simple. The GOP has no more right to perpetual support than the Whigs, which the GOP replaced, did. And if they think that conservatives can’t do without the GOP… they’d better think again.

Laura Curtis on September 15, 2010 at 11:26 AM

Good read

How many RINOs down does this make?

Laura you are quite right about this — “If the GOP refuses to be dragged (kicking and screaming) back to the right, then we’ll abandon it. It’s really that simple”

It’s happened before, the 1850s Whig party. Read history, start with the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Democrats legalized slavery with it, and read up until Abe Lincoln’s election under the Republican banner. The Whigs(Democrat lite) just dissolved and completely disappeared.

Barone was talking about this exact thing last week.

tarpon on September 15, 2010 at 11:42 AM

For the establishment of both parties, it’s all about power. If they need to abandon or compromise principles to win, then they will if it allows them to grab the levers of power. Both claim that being in control enables them to adopt their agenda. The problem with the Republicans is, why should we support a candidate who offers nothing different than what a Democrat would bring to the office? So that some supporters and hangers-on can get plum jobs? So that some constituents or donators can get the legislation they’re supporting or lobbying for? Republicans have to stand for something, not just power for the sake of careers.

NNtrancer on September 15, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Politicians in Washington have become completely infatuated with the power they think they hold. Instead of seeing themselves for what they are — public servants elected by their constituents — they have gotten this deluded notion into their heads that they own the seats they hold in Congress, regardless of whether voters still want them there or not.

And that is why I favor Term Limits. But not just for Congress, I want to term limit the entire civil bureaucracy. And time in Congress would count towards the bureaucracy limit. Only the Senate confirmed positions would be exempt. No more careerist politicians or bureaucrats.

LarryD on September 15, 2010 at 11:58 AM

While I was one who believes that Castle was a tactically better candidate than O’Donnell, I agree with your point.

And, I have had this argument for years with “moderates” in our party. they always complain when conservatives fight for their values and ask us to just get along and support the party. But when conservatives do win an intra-party dispute, the moderates NEVER support the conservative, and in fact go to the press and make every attempt to harm the conservative and undercut him/her in an effort to keep them from winnnig the election.

Moderates in the party have to ask themselves how often conservatives will be treated like that before leaving the party altogether. I have held my nose and voted many times. Most “moderates” have never done so.

Monkeytoe on September 15, 2010 at 12:21 PM

Cassy – in a nutshell – this is out with the blue blood and in with the new blood. This is the best thing that could possibly happen to the Republican Party and the worst of all worlds for the Republican establishment. Power and influence is for sale in Washington, but if we change diapers/politicians it is now much harder to buy. Citizen representatives mean that career politicians no longer have influence they can sell. Karl Rove is seeing his influence wane and he doesn’t like it.

Angry Dumbo on September 15, 2010 at 1:21 PM

Surprise — something Monkeytoe and I agree on. The thing about “moderates” is that they are as responsible as leftists for the condition we’re in, because they’ve been going along with the leftists’ tax-and-spend policies for years.

No, we don’t want a continuation of the “moderate” Republican path. All it is, in comparison to the Democrats’ record, is “less of same.” I don’t know if all the “moderates” have been unscathed by the economic downturn, or if they expect to be unscathed by the burdens of Obamacare, or what — but very frankly, they’re acting like our spiraling national debt and an Obama administration bent on unconstitutional power grabs isn’t an emergency.

They’re wrong. They’re the ones who have to change.

J.E. Dyer on September 15, 2010 at 3:13 PM

I could not agree more.

Cylor on September 16, 2010 at 3:04 AM

Very well said. The GOP establishment has looked down their noses at the grassroots for far too long.

jdawg on September 16, 2010 at 6:20 PM