Green Room

NRCC strat: Firm up the gimme seats; DCCC strat: Protect seat #39

posted at 1:02 pm on August 17, 2010 by

After Ed’s post this morning about the NRCC’s latest ad buy, I went back and reviewed this July Politico article detailing the DCCC’s own ad purchase, and compared both to my vulnerable Democrat list. Both sides are targeting 40 seats, so the pick distribution strategies are pretty easy to pick out.

The highlights:

A few conclusions. The NRCC is intent on locking down the most accessible seats first, and then depending on the popular wave to take them over the 39 seat threshold. The DCCC anticipates that this will be a wave election but is intent on making the 39th, majority-losing seat the most difficult one to take by creating a last-gasp, ten seat firewall. Why the NRCC would anticipate a wave and spend a lot of money on seats most susceptible to a wave instead of the wave outliers, or why the DCCC would start its firewall so late in the vulnerability list, are a bit beyond me.

In sum: The NRCC is on offense. It just isn’t, for whatever the reason, being very aggressive. Full list of NRCC/DCCC support follows:

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Why is the NRCC not being aggressive? I haven’t looked at the data recently, but I would guess that it has to do with funding.

Karl on August 17, 2010 at 1:27 PM

Why is the NRCC not being aggressive? I haven’t looked at the data recently, but I would guess that it has to do with funding.

Karl on August 17, 2010 at 1:27 PM

That’d explain it only partially. DCCC announced it was spending $28 million on 40 races; NRCC announced it was spending $22 million on 40 races. $6 million is real money, but that wouldn’t seem to me to be defining as to what sort of strategy the NRCC could carry out. Seems to me everyone’s playing it safe.

(Incidentally, I don’t think the choice of the NRCC to literally match the DCCC in the number of races is coincidental. Very “Annie Get Your Gun.”)

Patrick Ishmael on August 17, 2010 at 1:49 PM

Go donate to Lt. Col. Allen West in Fl-22. This guy just has to get in the congress. He is a star. The RNCC didn’t support him last time and Ron Slime went back to the congress to be Nancy Piglosi’s lap dog. That’s why I refuse to donate to the damn republicans. They only support the RINO’s. And Allah wonders why the repubs are not liked as much as the democrats?

Jayrae on August 17, 2010 at 5:24 PM

Why lock down those ten seats? Probably because the Dems can spend enough money to win almost any one or two seats, and so all must be defended. The faster we get these out of play, the better.

njcommuter on August 17, 2010 at 10:23 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint

McConnell may not get his wish on health care vote

Taylor Millard Jun 25, 2017 7:31 PM
Top Pick

Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”

Top Pick

Helping others without the government.

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…