The New Abnormal

posted at 2:16 am on August 14, 2010 by

Back in June, Vice President Joe Biden made one of the bizarre statements for which he has become famous, as reported by CBS News:

Vice President Joe Biden gave a stark assessment of the economy today, telling an audience of supporters, “there’s no possibility to restore 8 million jobs lost in the Great Recession.”

Appearing at a fundraiser with Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) in Milwaukee, the vice president remarked that by the time he and President Obama took office in 2008, the gross domestic product had shrunk and hundreds of thousands of jobs had been lost.

“We inherited a godawful mess,” he said, adding there was “no way to regenerate $3 trillion that was lost. Not misplaced, lost.”

There’s no possibility those jobs will ever come back?  Really?  The American economy simply decided to wipe out eight million positions?  The real unemployment rate, counting long-term discouraged workers who have dropped out of the labor force entirely, is over 16%.  Some metrics place it closer to 21%.  Does anyone really believe that the free market, of its own accord, would choose to leave a fifth of the working population idle?

Notice the typical, pathetic bleat about how it’s all George Bush’s fault.  Jobless claims hit a six-month high after Biden’s remarks, so I guess dejected businessmen still awaken in the middle of the night, haunted by the memory of George W. Bush, and fumble out their Blackberries to terminate employees until they feel better.

The New Abnormal is becoming a big part of the Democrats’ pre-election spin.  Americans are supposed to accept their reduced standard of living and shrunken economy.  They should lift their watery eyes in gratitude to the noble Democrat Party, which won’t let any semblance of fiscal responsibility stop them from looting the future to provide endless unemployment benefits.  The entire concept of unemployment has become a welfare hammock, with people like Biden essentially telling the jobless that a substantial number of them (eight million!) can expect to spend the rest of their lives that way.  As Chuck Schumer, the tired old hack who will succeed Harry Reid as Senate majority leader unless Americans really wake up and roll to the polls in November, puts it:

“It’s the world we’re in. It’s a much more negative, critical world, and people are sour now,” he said. “The thing they’re most sour about is the future, not the present. In other words, if people were sure that things would be better five years from now, they’d be less sour.

“Given that, I think people are more negative right now across the board — the right wing is more negative, the left wing is more negative, the center is more negative. That’s how it is.”…

Schumer, by the way, arrived in the Senate two years before the election of George W. Bush.  His party has held the Senate majority since 2006.  But try not to think about that.  Just hate Bush, and accept the sad new future over which Democrats preside as mournful, helpless custodians.

There’s nothing terribly mysterious about our high unemployment rate.  The primary engine of job creation in the United States is small business, which is generally held to produce about 70% of new jobs.  This is easy enough to understand.  Large corporations strive to maintain relatively stable work forces.  They might have big layoffs after financial setbacks, or hire new people as they introduce new products or expand sales operations, but their growth is relatively slow.  A large number of small businesses can be expected to grow more explosively, and require more human capital, as they discover market opportunities.

Investment in human capital takes time to mature.  You’ve got to train people after you hire them, and weed out unsuitable employees during their probationary periods.  For this reason, businesses staff to meet future needs.  It does little good for a manager to look around on a Thursday afternoon, and suddenly realize he could use a couple more people.  These decisions must be made in advance.

Large businesses tend to be much more confident about long-term financial predictions than small ones.  They’ve got highly skilled accountants on staff, and consultants on retainer.  The little guy does not have the resources to see quite as far ahead.  This naturally makes small businesses more nervous about uncontrollable forces which might increase costs in the near future.  They can’t absorb cost increases as well as large corporations can.  Small business owners often develop a rapport with their employees, and hate the idea of hiring someone in May, only to find themselves forced to let the new person go in August.

These factors combine to make the small businessman – seated at the controls of America’s engine of job growth – highly responsive to negative income and cost projections.  This Administration has absolutely hammered the small businessman with enormous costs and mandates.  Growing enough to cross the line that triggers the heaviest burdens of ObamaCare can swiftly obliterate a small business.  Reckless deficit spending makes them nervous about monetary policy.  Gigantic bills no one has read – or, in one especially shameful case, named – are packed with buzzing swarms of unintended consequences.  It’s no coincidence that unemployment grew worse as the land mines strewn through the ObamaCare bill began detonating.  Who knows what will come next?  There are some blood-curdling sounds coming from the fetid swamp of that lame-duck session of Congress.  It’s obvious from all the “unexpected” economic news that no one in Washington knows what they’re doing.

If rising labor costs lead to unemployment, then a helping of pork-fried “stimulus” should make businesses hire people, right?  Of course not.  Employment is a long-term relationship.  Businesses, especially small ones, hire people to meet future needs, not to collect one-time subsidies.  Thin curtains woven from taxpayer dollars cannot hide the predatory government currently in power… or the uncertain future of command economics, driven by irrational ideology, it offers.

With politically connected unions and mismanaged blue states teetering on the edge of collapse, they can anticipate even greater transfers of money from private to public sectors… which will mean even greater burdens for what remains of private industry.  Every small business owner knows that his personal income turns him into a target for this Administration and Congress.  Artillery is already incoming from the expiring Bush tax cuts.  Why take risks, when the rewards will simply be confiscated by a ravenous government?

There is no reason for a sensible small businessman to do anything but dig in, protect his assets, and await less greedy, more competent leadership.  The decision to reject the New Abnormal will be made at the ballot box, not in the boardroom.  That’s why nobody is hiring right now.  We all understand that we need to fire a bunch of people in Washington first.

Cross-posted at www.doczero.org.

Doctor Zero: Year One now available from Amazon.com!

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The voters of today are fitting shackles to the wage-earners of tomorrow. If we borrow, borrow, borrow for the “needs” of today, then the taxpayers of future years can pay and pay and pay — and we need never find any balance between our insatiable wants and our expected obligations. Anyone seen a Federal budget lately?

At some point, our children and our future selves will have to do something unpleasant…or live as slaves to their spendthrift past — our reckless present. Every day the problem is worse. Every day the hole is deeper.

With this Sword of Damocles hanging over our heads, is it any wonder that there is such a shadow over small business? Over small investors? Over small taxpayers? Over small workers? In the face of the Obamanation, the only safety lies in being Too Big To Fail. The rest of us are on our own.

cthulhu on August 14, 2010 at 4:29 AM

The American people are rediscovering austerity as a virtue. Even kids are learning to shun designer crud and how to stretch a buck at Goodwill. Yet some people have been doing this their entire lives.

The government is the last place for this to catch on, and by government I mean from the feds to the local school board. When was the last time you saw a government employee driving a 10 year old car? You are told ‘well, it costs too much to maintain them so it is cheaper to replace every 2-3 years.’ Really? I can prove that my operating cost/mile driving moderately used cars is far below that of a new car.

Why does this relate to Doc’s article? Because it is true that many of these jobs, which were consumer driven, are lost for the foreseeable future. The way out is to innovate and create new markets. Laptops sales in 1960 totaled zero dollars. When the government takes dollars or imposes new requirements on people/businesses, they have less resources to innovate. It is a downward spiral that can only be reversed by forcing government to be small and austere.

This force has to be applied at the ballot box.

GnuBreed on August 14, 2010 at 7:15 AM

I work with quite a few small business owners every day of the week. Not a single one of them is capable of projecting for budget or P&L much past one fiscal quarter. None. Pre-meltdown most ccould forsee two to four quarters down the road and allocate resources on each ledger entry. This has had the net effect of reducing the capital outlays of their company dramatically. And several of the business owners have taken personal pay cuts, deep in some cases, to prevent layoffs. Others have liquidated personal assets to float their business as the banks are telling them all that they are now considered high risk.

Yes, and the banks are another story. Federal regulators have begun acting responsibly in some ways. They are requiring greater allocation ratios of loan to loss. But backing that up with greater scrutiny of the “rules”, loaning to the predefined groups such as minority and woman-owned. Throw in a reluctance for small business owners to even want to borrow what they may not be able to repay due to the lack of forecasting ability and stagnation in the small business economy is inevitable.

It boils down to there being little demand in the marketplace. And considering the unemployment situation, how could one expect differently? I’d love to cite source, but a friend said that the dairy industry has noticed that sales are good the first half of every month, drop dramatically the second half. People are having to forgo a basic food item, regarding it as a luxury, while catching up on other obligations during the second half the month. Translate this across the broad landscape of products and services and it’s should be easy to discern where our future lies. The new abnormal.

Robert17 on August 14, 2010 at 8:07 AM

There was a book written back in the 1990s – I forget the title – that challenged American Managers to look at their organization and ask themselves not ‘How can we do this better?’ but rather ‘Why do we do this at all?’

This is a question that the politicians most need to ask themselves about Washington D.C. And we the citizenry need to make sure they ask the question and then act on the answer. Too much of the central government is either redundant or unproductive. And these excessive overhead costs are what’s holding the rest of us down.

potkas7 on August 14, 2010 at 12:28 PM

Among our national leaders retarded is the new normal.

Bugler on August 14, 2010 at 6:13 PM

It’s all bit of history repeating:

“They tell us we must learn to live with less, and teach our children that their lives will be less full and prosperous than ours have been; that the America of the coming years will be a place where — because of our past excesses — it will be impossible to dream and make those dreams come true. I don’t believe that. And, I don’t believe you do either. That is why I am seeking the presidency. I cannot and will not stand by and see this great country destroy itself. Our leaders attempt to blame their failures on circumstances beyond their control, on false estimates by unknown, unidentifiable experts who rewrite modern history in an attempt to convince us our high standard of living, the result of thrift and hard work, is somehow selfish extravagance which we must renounce as we join in sharing scarcity. I don’t agree that our nation must resign itself to inevitable decline, yielding its proud position to other hands. I am totally unwilling to see this country fail in its obligation to itself and to the other free peoples of the world….

A troubled and afflicted mankind looks to us, pleading for us to keep our rendezvous with destiny; that we will uphold the principles of self-reliance, self-discipline, morality, and, above all, responsible liberty for every individual that we will become that shining city on a hill.”
-Ronald Reagan, Official Announcement of being a candidate for U.S. President (1979-11-13)

redeye on August 14, 2010 at 6:23 PM

Maybe I’m wrong, but I seem to remember another president telling the American people that our best days were behind us, that we’d never be great again; to get used to the misery. Funny thing that misery index was used against him by a guy who talked about a shining city on a hill. The peanut farmer lost his bid for a second term and we did come back bigger and better for a while.

This is one time I hope history repeats itself.

Duncan Khuver on August 14, 2010 at 7:28 PM

BTW redeye, I was just adding my recollections to your post. I hope 1) the Republicans bring back the misery index with a solid plan to turn things around and 2) the people listen.

Duncan Khuver on August 14, 2010 at 7:29 PM

Since Obama has taken office he has expanded the number of federal employees to the highest levels ever, over 2.15 million. He’s actually well on the way to eradicating unemployment in his lifetime. The only problem his type of employees don’t produce anything. Except maybe problems for other people.

Tommy_G on August 14, 2010 at 7:50 PM

“We inherited a godawful mess,” he said

“Inherited”? I believe the word you meant was “created” Mr. Biden. Before becoming vice president, you were a member of the U.S. Senate for what, 3 decades or so? You had your dirty fingerprints over every one of the failed government policies that caused the fiscal mess we’re faced with today: from the idiotic “social justice” engineering schemes of the Community Reinvestment Act, to the equally moronic redistributionist policies of Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s lending practices, to the bloated and unsustainable pork-laden yearly federal budgets.

You didn’t “inherit” a damn thing, Joe Biden. You and your corrupt, brain-dead colleagues spent years creating this mess. And now our children and grandchildren will inherit the burden of trying to dig themselves out from under the mountain of debt you’ve heaped upon them in the interests of buying yourself re-election every 6 years.

So spin your lies any way you like Joe. We know the truth of what you did. And history will know it as well.

AZCoyote on August 15, 2010 at 7:55 AM

Pretty good post. however what biden was saying is what the leaders do not want to talk about in detail. the recession is a product of lack of demand due to the great sucking sound of jobs leaving the country. NAFTA was enacted in 1994. For the last 16 years the jobs market in this country shifted from manufacturing to construction and service jobs. That shift lead to massive home/commercial building as the government shifted incentives to artifically creat demand for those building and homes. At the same time banks loosened credit standards allowing americans to access cheap credit. You also had a massive outbuilding of telecom infrastructre to meet the new internet demand. The bust of the internet bubble required the government to increase the incentives into the housing market, banks to loosen credit more to compensate.

all of this allowed the government to mask the total destruction of our economy by NAFTA, WTO, and outsourcing. Those are the jobs that Biden said are gone. Those false jobs created by government programs and incentives that artifically increased demand for things like homes and comercial buildings. now that the easy credit is gone and the stealing of our countries wealth is complete the politicans are starting to come clean and state the truth.

those jobs are gone. they are not coming back unless of course the government decides to reverse course and leave the “free trade” failed policy on the dust heap of history where it belongs.

unseen on August 15, 2010 at 8:42 AM

This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.

Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.

Ed Morrissey on August 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM