Green Room

The Value of a Volt

posted at 1:05 am on August 1, 2010 by

How much is a new Chevy Volt electric car worth?

The sticker price is $41,000.  However, with federal subsidies, you could pay as little as $33,500.  Additional subsidies provided by the state of California could knock it down even lower, for residents of the Golden State.  So what’s the price?

$41,000, of course.  The subsidies just mean you don’t pay all of it.  The utterly bankrupt federal government takes money from other taxpayers, and uses it to discount your purchase.  Since California is teetering on the edge of total collapse, and may well require federal bailouts in the near future, taxpayers across the country could end up paying additional sums to support Volt purchases that happen to occur within the state of California.  These transfer payments are mixed into the thickening concrete surrounding the American economy, making it just a few inches deeper.

But wait, there’s more.  Almost four hundred million dollars in federal subsidies were pumped directly into the design and production of the Volt.  The initial production run consists of just ten thousand units, with 45,000 more planned for 2012 if sales are good.  This would add just over $7200 more in taxpayer subsidies to each Volt produced over the next two years.  Since 2012 production will be scaled back if early sales are disappointing, it might be more logical to add the subsidies to the first 10,000 units only, which would leave early adopters outside of California paying $33,500 for a car which actually costs $81,000 per unit, with taxpayers picking up the remainder.  It’s actually even worse than that, because GM expects to lose money on every Volt sale.  Those losses will be spread among other GM products, or perhaps wiped out with further taxpayer subsidies.

The Volt would not exist at all, if the government had not performed an elaborate voodoo ritual which involved burning $50 billion in taxpayer cash and sprinkling the ashes over the United Auto Workers union.  This raised General Motors from its free-market grave, and placed it at the service of those who killed it.   How much of this fifty billion should be divided among the Volt production run to calculate its true, final value?

There was no great consumer demand for the Volt.  Toyota has been doing quite well selling the Prius, and Nissan has its own electric car, the Leaf, on the way.  The purpose of seizing money from taxpayers to finance the Volt was preserving the jobs of union members politically connected to the Democrat Party, a point President Obama underlined in a recent speech in Detroit:

“If some folks had their way, none of this would be happening,” Obama said, as Chrysler workers booed his reference to Republicans who voted against the bailout. “Just want to point that out. Right? This plant and your jobs might not exist. There were leaders of the ‘just say no’ crowd in Washington. They were saying, ‘Oh, standing by the auto industry would guarantee failure.’ One of them called it ‘the worst investment you could possibly make.’”

The folks who would have prevented this glorious moment in State engineering would be you, the taxpayers, who would never have agreed to pay almost fifty grand apiece to underwrite the production and sale of a little fleet of tiny cars with laughable battery cruise ranges… and overall fuel efficiency that would take decades to equal the cost of purchasing and fueling a more attractive, existing vehicle that didn’t require massive government subsidies.

Obama is lying through his teeth when he refers to the GM bailout as an “investment”  Politicians love to throw that word around, because they think it makes them sound like savvy businessmen.  Investments are voluntaryacts, conducted with the expectation of return.  You were compelled to pay for the development of the Volt, and unless you’re one of the tiny percentage of the public who purchase one, you will receive nothing in return for these payments.  You paid to preserve the jobs of rich and powerful labor unions, and provide a handsome discount to the few buyers who find the emotional satisfaction of saluting Green dogma to be worth $33,500.  Virtually no onewould be willing to pay the true price of $81,000 for that satisfaction.

Subsidies and mandates based on ideology hopelessly distort the value of products, confusing the marketplace in the same manner as consumer fraud and theft.  It’s as if car dealers were in the practice of routinely stealing automobiles from other states, and reselling them at steep discounts.  The ability of the consumer to assess value and make rational purchases, expressing their demands and allowing the distributed intelligence of the markets to allocate resources efficiently in response, is destroyed.

Worst of all, consumers never see the opportunity costs of enforcing political mandates on the economy.  They never see what could have been done with all the money taken from them to provide subsidies to the politically connected.  They’ll never know what other auto manufacturers would have done to win over the market share released by the richly-deserved death of General Motors, or how many jobs would have been created by the production of goods the free people of the United States actually want.

The number of Chevy Volts desired by those free people is zero.  By government decree, there will be up to 55,000 of them gathering dust in the far corners of three-car garages by 2012.  The government didn’t subsidize this boondoggle.  The “government” doesn’t subsidize anything.  You do.Imagine what  the taxpayers of America might have done with the billions taken away from them to produce those cars, divide that lost value by 55,000, and you will begin to comprehend the true cost of a Chevy Volt.

Cross-posted at www.doczero.org.

Doctor Zero: Year One now available from Amazon.com!


Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Is there any chance that the US subsidizes oil and gas? Is the amount more or less than the amount used to subsidize alternatives? I think that is an important question. I would be grateful if you could apply the same methodology and provide an answer.

lexhamfox on August 1, 2010 at 2:39 AM

lexhamfox on August 1, 2010 at 2:39 AM

Got news for you. The Gubmint “subsidizes” everything that they collect taxes for and then redistribute otherwise. Agriculture for instance. You would be paying a lot less for cheese or beer if the Gubmint didn’t have their hands in it. Or teddy bears if the Gubmint didn’t have regulations for testing the content of the stuffing of said teddy bears (some of your collected taxes go to pay the bureaucrats to rubber stamp some documents from the Large Teddy Bear Manufacturers who add the testing charges for the rubber stampers back into the cost of the product).

If you’ve ever bought veggies off a roadside stand as a comparison of “store bought” pricing, or worked for anyone with an accounting department, you’d get a good understanding of this. The regulations, rules, forms to fill out; taxes, licenses, fees to be paid: totally outrageous.

Robert17 on August 1, 2010 at 7:03 AM

Is there any chance that the US subsidizes oil and gas? Is the amount more or less than the amount used to subsidize alternatives? I think that is an important question. I would be grateful if you could apply the same methodology and provide an answer.

lexhamfox on August 1, 2010 at 2:39 AM

I think it’s cute that you think the Gov’t doesn’t already subsidize oil and gas.

uknowmorethanme on August 1, 2010 at 8:33 AM

uknowmorethanme

The government doesn’t subsidize anything. We do.

Living4Him5534 on August 1, 2010 at 9:32 AM

excellent post Dr Z…

my husband and I had a little discussion over this boondoggle yesterday, will forward this to him for a more reinforcement…

cmsinaz on August 1, 2010 at 10:08 AM

Speaking for myself, I do not have $33,500 to pay for a car, any car. It may be a good idea but until they make it affordable for almost everyone it’s out of the question.

jeanie on August 1, 2010 at 10:27 AM

This post has been promoted to HotAir.com.

Comments have been closed on this post but the discussion continues here.

Ed Morrissey on August 1, 2010 at 2:44 PM