Fouling their own nests

posted at 2:19 pm on July 14, 2010 by

Sometimes a zealot is his own worst enemy. That’s been one of the interesting aspects of the War on Terror: in places where al Qaeda or the Taliban gain control, and implement their extremist policies, they soon make the locals hate them. The result, eventually, has been backlash. That’s what led to the Anbar Awakening, where the local Sunnis decided they were better off allying with the Americans than the extremists.

The Islamists are experts at fouling their own nests. They gained some credibility with the legendary “Muslim Street” with their attacks in New York, Washington, London, and Madrid. But certain behind-the-scenes intelligence gathering operations soon shut most of that down, and instead of redoubling their efforts to put together attacks on the West, they began to choose easier targets.

Which is to say, they began to target fellow Muslims. At this point, the vast majority of innocents killed by al Qaeda are Muslims, not “Crusaders”. And this, too, has discredited them.

But it’s the way they rule once they have full control in an area which really has harmed them most. When trying to seduce a local population to gain support, they make all kinds of promises and what they say seems to sound pretty good. However, once they win and take control, they implement their real agenda — and usually end up inspiring a huge backlash.

Isn’t it interesting that the Democrats in the US also seem to have fouled their own nest? I’m not suggesting that the Democrats are in any other important way the same as al Qaeda, but they did make all kinds of pie-in-the-sky promises in the 2008 election campaign.

And having won the White House and a huge majority in both chambers of Congress, they too showed their true colors — and American voters don’t like what they’re seeing. Indeed, it’s not going too far to say that the majority hate it.

Traditionally the party out of power makes big gains in the mid-term election, but we seem to be heading into a historical blow-out for the Republicans. If that happens, the Democrats will have no one but themselves to blame for it.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

And having won the White House and a huge majority in both chambers of Congress, they too showed their true colors — and American voters don’t like what they’re seeing. Indeed, it’s not going too far to say that the majority hate it.

[stands up and applauds wildly] Well said, sir!!!

Mary in LA on July 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM

Isn’t it interesting that the Democrats in the US also seem to have fouled their own nest? I’m not suggesting that the Democrats are in any other important way the same as al Qaeda, but they did make all kinds of pie-in-the-sky promises in the 2008 election campaign.

They do more than suggest that we’re the same as al-Qaeda all day long, every day of the week.

The expression “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” is starting to summarize more and more of my political attitudes.

Cylor on July 15, 2010 at 6:11 AM

The other thing to note about the true believers is that, faced with incontrovertible evidence that their plans are not working/backfiring, they don’t see the light and reform their ways. Instead, they double-down on their previous actions, under the idea that the force of their will can simply force the unenlightened to go along with what they want to do.

In the case of al Qaida in the U.S., that means, for example, 14 years of attempted bomb plots on the New York City subway system (which would work if no one was paying attention or didn’t believe such an action was possible, as in the case of the 9/11 attacks). For the Democrats, it means a possible lame-duck session of Congress in December where they give the big middle finger to the voters for rejecting their already-passed laws and other proposals, while looking towards 2012, it means a White House that might put on one of the all-time great PR shows in saying they’re triangulating, but will simply try to demonize Republicans in Congress while doing nothing near Bill Clinton’s (reluctant) signing of the welfare reform bill in 1996.

jon1979 on July 15, 2010 at 9:40 AM