Awakening From The Collective Dream
posted at 10:53 pm on June 29, 2010 by Doctor Zero
Thomas Sowell makes an interesting point about gun control laws, in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision concerning the Second Amendment:
When you stop and think about it, there is no obvious reason why issues like gun control should be ideological issues in the first place. It is ultimately an empirical question whether allowing ordinary citizens to have firearms will increase or decrease the amount of violence.
He goes on to explain that if gun control had a proven track record of reducing violent crime, the American people could employ Constitutional mechanisms to modify or repeal the Second Amendment:
There is no point arguing, as many people do, that it is difficult to amend the Constitution. The fact that it doesn’t happen very often doesn’t mean that it is difficult. The people may not want it to happen, even if the intelligentsia are itching to change it.
When the people wanted it to happen, the Constitution was amended 4 times in 8 years, from 1913 through 1920.
There is no such public enthusiasm for gun control laws, because they obviously don’t work. “Gun-free” cities like Chicago produce bumper crops of bullet-riddled corpses. There is nothing confusing or mysterious about the failure of gun control to reduce violent crime. For all its resources, the State is rarely able to prevent violent crime. In a vast population justifiably concerned about its privacy, the prevention of violent crime is a duty for the armed citizen. Accepting this simple truth does not denigrate the importance of the police, or the heroic service of police officers. Every cop who ever worked a murder scene wishes he could have been there to stop it… and knows he probably won’t be there to stop the next murder.
Gun control is one of many old collectivist fantasies melting away in the harsh light of undeniable truth. Another is the daydream of “alternative energy.” Such technologies will certainly be developed in the long run, but they provide no viable alternative to fossil fuel consumption at the present time. The economic repercussions of fabulously expensive, or tightly rationed, gasoline would be staggering. The retail price of almost all goods would skyrocket, while industries dependent upon cheap and reliable transportation would wither. Imagine the blow to employment that would be delivered by the end of affordable commuting in suburban areas. The “alternative” to oil is not green jobs and clean energy, but unemployed people sitting in the dark.
The entire Western world is suffering a painful lesson about the fantasy of limitless government resources. The pool of evil, faceless rich people who can be taxed to provide socialist benefits turns out to be quite limited indeed. Absurd benefits promised to unionized employees are not a perpetual motion engine for State growth. They’re a locomotive racing toward the brick wall of insolvency. The ridiculous concept of static analysis lies in ruins, as it becomes painfully obvious to all but the most delusional true believers that rising tax rates and government spending do strangle economic growth over the long term.
The mythology of wise and compassionate government is drowning in a mixture of oil bubbling up from the Gulf of Mexico, and sleaze pouring out of Washington. The government has many vital duties to perform, but as it grows in size, it becomes less interested in performing them. Its own ambitions take priority over its responsibilities to a private sector it increasingly comes to view as an adversary… since the State must both demonize the private sector to conceal its own failures, and use compulsive force to extract resources from workers and businesses. No one should harbor any further misconceptions about maintaining the transparency of the State as it swells in size.
All of collectivism’s dreams are crumbling to dust before the eyes of people who spent their whole lives clinging to them out of desperation, or arrogance. The alternative to ambition and commerce is not “social justice,” but widespread poverty. The absence of growth brings collapse, not sustainability. The Constitutional rights of free people cannot exist alongside “positive rights” provided through redistribution. Abandoning the security of our borders does not produce a melting pot of happy immigrants. The government cannot repeal the laws of supply and demand. The freedom to vote does not render all other freedoms inconsequential. Prosperity for millions cannot be designed by a central committee. Social justice cannot be created by administering controlled viral doses of injustice.
Waking up from these dreams is not easy. Every conservative must have the patience and humor of a good teacher. I believe Big Government is fundamentally immoral, but as Dr. Sowell pointed out, the simple fact that it doesn’t work cannot be overstated. The collectivist fantasy can end in a relatively controlled manner, with a widespread rediscovery of how freedom and prosperity are inextricably linked… or it can end with the bloody violence of Greece, as angry dependents strip the last measure of their unsustainable benefits from the hide of the middle class. One way or the other, it is ending. Twilight falls upon the empty dream of the twentieth century: to sanctify a brilliant elite through the sacred ritual of the vote, and be ruled wisely.
Cross-posted at www.doczero.org.
Doctor Zero: Year One now available from CreateSpace and Amazon.com!









Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
Similar things were written after the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Bloc dissolved, the Chinese allowed some capitalism, Hernando de Soto consulted with rulers of teeming cities, VP Gore was charged with cutting bureaucratic waste, country after country reformed their economy to encourage more entrepreneurship, Milton Friedman’s books got made into TV documentaries. Bill Clinton even said, “The age of big government is over.”
I thought, maybe people really have learned that. The dismal oppressive failure of socialism/fascism stood all around. There was no way to defend it. The entire 20th century was one experiment after another in top-down control – all shown in the end to be murderous, oppressive, corrupt systems.
But no. A new generation came up, a financial crisis happened, and everyone wants to throw that knowledge out the window. “We’re all socialists now.” (Although, if you call Obama you’re a socialist, you’re a paranoid wingnutter.)
So are we really awakening this time?
YehuditTX on June 29, 2010 at 11:51 PM
We will know starting this November, and beyond. I hope so.
gryphon202 on June 30, 2010 at 12:09 AM
I do think we are. I believe the demise of the old order is a matter of mathematical certainty – it can be calculated on a spreadsheet. The volume of people objecting to the comprehensive failure of socialist theory has become deafening. A philosophy with a hundred-year track record of bankruptcy and broken promises has no response when confronted with a terminal diagnosis.
This is not to say victory and renewal are foregone conclusions. A hard fight lies ahead, and I want to do my part to win it. I retain an abiding respect for the American spirit of independence. We will not lie quietly in our deathbed.
Let us show our countrymen why the masters of the dying super-State have *nothing* to offer that is worth trading away their liberty.
Doctor Zero on June 30, 2010 at 12:22 AM
Unfortunately, it was just as mathematically certain before 36 million people died in China ’58-61. Or before 5 million people died in Russia in 1921. Or before so many others died in so many other places. More death, destruction, and misery can be laid to the effects of wishful thinking than can be attributed to any number of spreadsheets and any amount of reason. And the collective dream is wishful thinking squared.
So many arguments between left and right boil down to: “You just don’t care!” v. “It just doesn’t work!”. Conservatives who care about the poor want them to find suitable employment; liberals who care about the poor want to find them a suitable host.
I share YehuditTX’s pain. Surely, it is so blindingly obvious that we should have turned the corner and wealth redistribution should sit on the same shelf as phlogiston. We should be talking about quantum mechanics, or genetic engineering, or some other, newer flavor of economics that might actually get somewhere……but, instead, we’re still talking about Keynesism through statist-colored glasses. Even Keynes, himself, didn’t believe in the sort of bilge that is promulgated today in his name.
With the excitement over the Reagan years, it seemed that we were close to that day when someone who attempted to marry the behaviors of failure to the trappings of success by government fiat would be greeted with the same reaction as someone who said, “I schtupped a goat in Lagos one evening, it was all they had for nightlife there”: a bit of a gasp, silence, then a fervent attempt to change the subject. We could hope that the sorry chapter of failure that is Marxism/Socialism might finally be closed.
We came so close to shining the light of reason on economic thought, and having all the cockroaches flee. And now, thanks to Harvard, Trinity United, the Chicago Machine, and the Democratic Party, we have all arms of the government telling us that 2 + 2 = 5. We know it will fail. We know that it can’t possibly work. We know that attempting to demonstrate it involves pushing water uphill. And here we are, trillions of debt hung ’round our shoulders, failure upon failure in the streets, and morons like Krugman chanting, “further, deeper, further, deeper” from the sidelines.
The one and only consolation that I can bring to this sorry state of affairs is that it was worse going into the Carter years, and we didn’t know then that a Reagan would come.
cthulhu on June 30, 2010 at 2:40 AM
Gun control never has worked, throughout history … It just seems that now we finally figured that out after 200 plus years of listening to liberal stupidity. But this will not be the end of trying for liberals. They will soldier on with one stupid proposal after another, until eternity finally comes.
INCOMPETENCE — As if the example in the Gulf of abject big government incompetence and stupid regulations is not enough to convince you — We are about to find out how big a cluster-you-know-what big government really can really create with ObowmaKare. My guess is the financial meltdown wasn’t enough of a demonstration for you.
Oil Spill — So who wouldn’t want to remove 99% of the oil from the Gulf, but EPA, who says it must be 99.99985 removed or none at all. Stupidities finest hour.
tarpon on June 30, 2010 at 6:41 AM
The failures of the Progressive Agenda over the last 40 years are quite obvious to most rational people. As transparent as it may seem, there has nevertheless been such a dumbing down of Americans by the Progressive Educational Complex that many members of the American Progressive subset will continue to adhere to collectivist ideals regardless of the political and economic climate residing around them. And there will be hotly contested calls for more freebies as the reorganization of America takes shape, as it must.
Many of our parents have succeeded where our schools have failed. Many hard won lessons in life have succeeded where our schools have failed. It’s difficult to reconcile that lessons aren’t mutually available to us “Neanderthals” and the Progressives. Are schools that radically different from one state or city to another? Are parents that equally different from one family to another? Ideally we should overhaul schools first in an attempt to prevent the next few generations, the ones paying for current mistakes, avoid repeating the social and economic mess that will be the history they’ll inherit.
Getting Big Government out of the classrooms should be a priority. Note that much of the current decline socially and morally in America has come since prayer was banned, even from school systems that were fine with it. History has been rewritten for teachers that must not discipline pupils but send them to visit a committee. Personal responsibility isn’t taught at school; “everyone gets a trophy”. No one is allowed to stand out in the public schools. Even naming a valedictorian my result in a lawsuit. Such is the beast that helps form the young mindsets in schools these days.
Recent news indicates that higher education is padding the grades of students in order to “help” them compete in the job market (think Loyola Law School in Los Angeles). I’ve worked alongside numerous MBA grads that had a good cookie-cutter education but nevertheless failed miserably to understand that one size doesn’t fit all. And both these examples are from the current generation of graduates from Big Government Progressive Educational Complex schools.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Let’s start preventing now. There’s not a pound around now and it will only grow worse with the current Progressive Agenda
Robert17 on June 30, 2010 at 6:52 AM
So do Andrew Breitbart’s critic.
Seriously, your column is right on the money. Well said.
That’s the 64 trillion dollar question. I think we just might be. Greece’s failure, or even California’s, is not all that significant on a worldwide scale. But if the US goes to the edge of official bankruptcy that would be a “big effing deal” as our VP would put it. I think we’ll have to change, like it or not.
jwolf on June 30, 2010 at 8:52 AM
The only gun control that works is a steady hand, exhaling and squeezing the trigger.
Kissmygrits on June 30, 2010 at 10:08 AM
Well said as usual. It’d be nice if minorities would realize that gun control laws are unduly harsh on their communities, both now and historically.
After the Civil War, the courts held that the right to bear arms was necessary to allow freed blacks to defend their homes.
Today in many cities, guns are taken out of the hands of law-abiding minorities, while criminals run around with automatic weapons. You may as well put a sign in your yard that says “gun free zone” and see what happens.
hawksruleva on June 30, 2010 at 5:19 PM
I put my bets on the second scenario….
pseudonominus on June 30, 2010 at 6:05 PM
I think this is very much a mixed bag that depends on a number of factors such as the degree to which if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns is true, and in any case is very secondary to a citizenry being able to protect itself from an oppressive government, if necessary.
Tav on June 30, 2010 at 6:33 PM
Would that this were true but it is not. Not yet anyway.
Tav on June 30, 2010 at 6:37 PM
Good luck with that (to leftists) around here in South Central LA, especially with the older black people. Though most have bought the Obama kool-aid, leftists aren’t getting guns from black seniors without a fight.
Almost all of them migrated from the Jim Crow South and places like Oklahoma. I keep stressing that the reason black people did mostly survive those days is because most had guns, too. We never hear about that, though.
Unfortunately, the left has found other ways to keep black people in line. See above comment about the Progressive Education Complex (consider that moniker stolen).
baldilocks on June 30, 2010 at 7:19 PM
Oh and…
Don’t let the rhetoric of the so-called black leaders (the Left’s lackeys) fool you.
baldilocks on June 30, 2010 at 7:23 PM
The “alternative” to oil is not green jobs and clean energy, but unemployed people sitting in the dark.
Brilliant.
UndercoverInLA on June 30, 2010 at 7:29 PM
Every day we see examples of this phenomenon, and they seem to multiply exponentially as the government expands its reach.
Great analysis of the current compelling circumstances as usual DZ.
ontherocks on June 30, 2010 at 9:02 PM
Thanks AGAIN Doc!
tim c on June 30, 2010 at 9:12 PM
I once heard Condolezza Rice make the point about gun ownership that it was very comforting for a black child in the cross burning days to have a dad with a gun in the house when there was a mob in the front yard in the middle of the night. Don’t know if it ever happened or if it was metaphor, but it was a powerful and persuasive image.
txmomof6 on July 1, 2010 at 9:31 AM
With regards to your first and last thoughts, we are in agreement.
With regards to this statement:
I respectfully disagree.
United States v. Cruikshank quite emphatically sent the message to the freed blacks that they could not count on the Federal Government to secure their individual right to bear arms.
The decision effectively left the power with the State to do as the State pleased.
It is shameful it took 200+ years to reaffirm the individual right to bear arms.
rukiddingme on July 1, 2010 at 11:22 AM