School Nanny Staters Say ‘No Best Friend For You’

posted at 7:30 pm on June 24, 2010 by
[ Education ]   

Originally posted at NewsReal:

The Anchoress, over at First Things, is one of my favorite bloggers. She has a way of cutting right to the chase, yet in a thoughtful and intelligent manner. Her recent post, in response to an article in The New York Times, is a perfect example of why she is one of my must reads.

The article details the views of “experts” who now say that children should be discouraged from having best friends. That’s right. Best Friends Forever, otherwise known as BFFs, are now bad. I wonder if these so-called experts have any friends of their own, or if they’ve chased them all away with their pious “enlightened” mentality. That, or their super annoying sanctimony.

I think this recent trend of completely arse backwards “studies” may actually be retribution by scientists and alleged experts, for being shoved in lockers, receiving atomic wedgies and all that pointing and laughing.  I used to just giggle as I imagined them holed up in their little laboratories, shiny slide rules glinting under the fluorescent lights, geekily high-fiving each other’s clipboards. However, all these studies and recommendations and such affect me now, because they are causing steam to come out of my ears with anger and that’s really not a good look for me.

From The New York Times article:

. . . increasingly, some educators and other professionals who work with children are asking a question that might surprise their parents: Should a child really have a best friend?

“I think it is kids’ preference to pair up and have that one best friend. As adults — teachers and counselors — we try to encourage them not to do that,” said Christine Laycob, director of counseling at Mary Institute and St. Louis Country Day School in St. Louis. “We try to talk to kids and work with them to get them to have big groups of friends and not be so possessive about friends.”

“Parents sometimes say Johnny needs that one special friend,” she continued. “We say he doesn’t need a best friend.”

Oh, really? And who are you to tell me what my child needs?

As a mom who home schools her 7-year-old daughter, currently working at 2 grade levels above where a public school would place her, that is one of my biggest pet peeves. I’m so tired of the incessant “But, but — what about her socialization?” I’m sorry, but I thought school was for, you know, education. I didn’t realize that it was social hour. Personally, I prefer to not have my child forced into socializing with whomever a school randomly places her with, all of the exact same age, to boot.

When in life are you ever in a situation where you deal solely with people who are your exact same age? My daughter, Gracie, plays with children after school every day and “socializes” with them at our community pool for hours daily. She “socializes” with children of all ages. Since she’s never been indoctrinated to believe otherwise, she is not intimidated by older kids nor does she look down upon younger kids. They are all just kids to her. And she does have a best friend, an 8-year-old boy named Will. There is nothing wrong with that. The Anchoress correctly explains why schools and the so called experts want you to believe that there is:

This isn’t about what’s good for the children; it is about being better able to control adults by stripping from them any training in intimacy and interpersonal trust. Don’t let two people get together and separate themselves from the pack, or they might do something subversive, like…think differently.

This move against “best friends” is ultimately about preventing individuals from nurturing and expanding their individuality. It is about training our future adults to be unable to exist outside of the pack, the collective.

Bingo. For all their talk of individuality and alternative lifestyles and the like, the left wants nothing of the sort and they’ve extended that agenda to our schools. They do not want free thinkers. They want pack mentality. They don’t want individual freedom. They want sheep.

Well, they’ll have to try with someone else’s kid. My child won’t be forced to conform with the pack and her best friend allows her to be who she wants to be. Unconditionally.

The Anchoress ends by mentioning it’s yet another reason to consider homeschooling. I’d only amend that to say that it is yet another reason why I do home school.

—–

Follow Lori  on Twitter and read more of her NewsReal posts.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

You will be assimilated in the Borg collective. Resistance is futile.

John the Libertarian on June 24, 2010 at 7:44 PM

Further proof that the education system in America only exists to socialize compliant citizens.

Inanemergencydial on June 24, 2010 at 7:57 PM

Inanemergencydial on June 24, 2010 at 7:57 PM

The ultimate goal of John Dewey and Horace Mann the founders of the Modern Education system.

chemman on June 24, 2010 at 8:43 PM

It makes it easier for the state to control you.

ahem on June 25, 2010 at 1:52 AM

Now that I think about it, when I was a kid growing up in the ’50s and ’60s, my best friends were kids that weren’t in my classes, and often weren’t in my school. They were neighborhood kids. Until high school, and the increased mobility that comes with access to a car, that’s pretty much how it was.

tpitman on June 25, 2010 at 7:42 AM

Lori, you ALWAYS look steamy; and it’s a VERY good look for you! ;o)

Kidding aside, this is one of the most destructive social experiments the social progressives have come up with yet. I’m really not a conspiracy buff, but this has GOT to be nothing less than an attempt at socially crippling future generations. It’s mind-boggling that every perverse sort of human sexual behavior is militantly approved because “they were born that way”; but the innate need to form close bonds with a small group of friends, and even closer bonds with one or two friends — we were ALL born THAT way, assuming normal emotional development — is to be fought against?

Evil.

RegularJoe on June 25, 2010 at 8:08 AM

I used to think homeschoolers were nuts. Now I realize they are crazy like a fox.

Laura in Maryland on June 25, 2010 at 11:53 AM

These folks are fascinating. Fifth-graders having “sex” isn’t a social or psychological problem for them — just make sure the little darlings have condoms (not that it’s clear to me what purpose the condoms serve in this case) — but fifth-graders having “best friends” is a slow-motion social train wreck.

There’s defying parody, and there’s making thermonuclear war on it.

J.E. Dyer on June 25, 2010 at 3:33 PM