Green Room

Night of the Yeoman

posted at 1:37 am on June 24, 2010 by

There are two Republican parties, and both had a candidate on the 2008 presidential ticket.  John McCain was the candidate of the thin-blooded aristocracy, tired men who dislike certain elements of their nominal constituency far more intensely than their political opposition.  They have no strenuous objection to the premises of the Left, as could be seen from McCain’s swift acceptance of the freedom-has-failed spin pushed by the Democrats during the 2008 financial crisis.  Many of them believe opposition to the Left’s emotional narrative is electoral suicide.  This also makes them reluctant to criticize Democrat candidates in harsh terms… which they have no reluctance to deploy against conservative primary opponents.  They might speak up against its worst excesses, but they have no serious argument with the basic concept of Big Government – remember “National Greatness Conservatism?”  They offer themselves as wiser, perhaps slightly more frugal drivers of the vast federal sandworm.  They invest great effort in cultivating relationships with the dinosaur media, which they perceive as an irresistible force dominating American politics.  They always look honestly surprised when these relationships disintegrate at crucial moments during national campaigns.

The other Republican party is young and vital.  On the 2008 ticket, its banner was carried by Sarah Palin.  It’s the yeoman wing of the party, composed of people with middle-class backgrounds and real-world business experience.  These people are appalled at the bloated mess in Washington, and the smaller but equally fatal tumors infecting many state capitols.  They see a government speeding toward systemic collapse, its doom spelled out in the simple math of unsustainable entitlements and economy-crushing taxation.  They’re in love with the American people, a sincere passion that rings from every speech Palin delivers.  Their idealism and energy leads them to stumble occasionally, and some veteran political operatives of the old Republican gentry are eager to give them a firm shove from behind.  They correctly view the dinosaur media as an implacable opponent, and sometimes waste energy complaining about it… but the evolution of Palin’s media presence demonstrates they are learning to control the media, instead of fighting it.

The yeoman wing of the Republican Party had a very good night on Tuesday.  Nikki Haley strode with dignity across the puddle of sleaze leaking from the old party machine in South Carolina, with Tim Scott right beside her, while long-term incumbent Bob Inglis was annihilated by movement conservative Trey Gowdy.  Mike Lee won a much narrower, but still significant, victory in Utah.

These candidates share important New Right endorsements from Palin, Jim DeMint, and the Tea Party movement.  Most of Tuesday’s primary winners have also signed the new Contract With America, a sign of both intellectual consistency and honesty with the electorate.  This country has had more than enough of candidates who reveal their agenda after election, through bills that must be passed to discover their contents.  The yeoman Republicans understand that building a consensus, through honest discussion with voters, is essential to carrying out the difficult work ahead.  It won’t be enough to slip into office with a one percent margin of victory, then settle for the best legislation that can be trundled through Congress without giving The New York Times a stroke.

The new Republicans are horrified not only at the mind-blowing cost of Big Government, but also its shocking incompetence.  They’re watching colleague Bobby Jindal fight a courageous battle against a confused, corrupt federal apparatus that has become worse than useless in the race to defend the Gulf Coast.  Jindal is often dismissed for delivering a clumsy speech at the dawn of his national career, but the yeoman Republicans understand something the rest of their country is slowly realizing: leadership has little to do with impressing pundits and scoring well at Washington parlor games.  The current occupant of the Oval Office had a finely drafted political resume, stuffed with empty “achievements” that qualified him to do nothing except demand money and power.  The horrifying inadequacy of such hollow men is on display off the coast of Louisiana.  Good thing we didn’t get saddled with a president who isn’t entirely occupied with “transforming” an unwilling populace, or a vice president who actually knows something about oil drilling!

Federal and state governments are riddled with people like Barack Obama, producing a system completely focused on feeding itself, and too bloated to take effective action.  It is almost completely insulated from consequence.  Its wits are dulled by its perceived lack of budgetary or behavioral restrictions.  Its deconstruction will require the conviction and charisma of Sarah Palin, the brilliance of Bobby Jindal, the courage of New Jersey governor Chris Christie, and the enthusiasm of the primary winners from Tuesday night.  The American people should no longer settle for representatives whose resumes contain nothing but political accomplishments – as if those are somehow worth a damn compared to private-sector experience.  It took a lot of accomplished politicians to engineer a government with over a hundred trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities.

Transforming a population is relatively easy – government policies in America have been doing it for decades, to the ruin of their subjects.  Transforming the State is a far more difficult proposition.  The victors in the November elections will win front-line positions in the greatest economic, cultural, and political struggle of our lifetimes.  Their challenge will be to reintroduce concepts like due process, Constitutional restraint, and fiscal responsibility to a public grown accustomed to suspending all of those things, during a never-ending string of “emergencies.”  They’ll have to explain why “freedom” is not a careful bargain with unlimited state power, and why markets are not “free” when the State has the power to revoke anyone’s presence in them, whenever it sees fit.  They will be tasked with teaching an increasingly dependent population that no society can survive for long by devouring itself.  There will be no room on the front lines for tired old men whose primary concern is negotiating a good price for their surrender.

Cross-posted at www.doczero.org.

Doctor Zero: Year One now available from CreateSpace and Amazon.com!

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

OT But Please check this out!

OT I got the following link from a GatewayPundit post

I hope(as do they) that they are wrong, but they don’t think so. If they are right then the Gulf BP disaster could continue until the whole field is emptied…as much as 2-2.5 billion barrels, or more. According to the article, BP and the administration know this, but aren’t being forthcoming. A must read!!

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6593/648967

stacy on June 24, 2010 at 2:44 AM

Doc, I don’t know who you are going to work for in the future, but your speech writing could really help to save this nation, keep it up.

tim c on June 24, 2010 at 7:19 AM

I have hope, Doc, because I believe. Thanks for always reminding me why.

publiuspen on June 24, 2010 at 8:45 AM

That last paragraph says it all and should be a rallying point shouted from the rooftops by every conservative candidate. The people will respond when the truth is presented to them.

Kissmygrits on June 24, 2010 at 9:57 AM

That last paragraph says it all and should be a rallying point shouted from the rooftops by every conservative candidate. The people will respond when the truth is presented to them.

Kissmygrits on June 24, 2010 at 9:57 AM

Big ditto!

Thanks again, Doc

Rovin on June 24, 2010 at 10:38 AM

Sorry, Doc.

HUGE VOLUME, and

Immense amount of fiber. No substance.

But I’ll crap well, tomorrow.

heldmyw on June 24, 2010 at 9:58 PM

right on right on right on

Kermit on June 24, 2010 at 10:09 PM

Another grand slam Doc. It’s the Gerald Ford/Dole/McCain wing of the party vs. the Reagan wing all over again.

Paul Revere_1 on June 24, 2010 at 10:13 PM

There will be no room on the front lines for tired old men whose primary concern is negotiating a good price for their surrender.

Allahpundit is old?

Stephen M on June 24, 2010 at 10:14 PM

Awesome Doc! Awesome!
Are you Rush in disguise?

dhunter on June 24, 2010 at 10:19 PM

There are at least three Republican parties. (1) the Establishment types, (2) what you call the Yeoman, including commonsense people like Sarah Palin, and (3) the Magical Thinking Republicans, who believe that 90% of Americans will magically become solid conservatives if they just hear the right sales pitch, or the right horror story. The truth is, putting together a majority on the right is always a compromise, will always involve a crude patchwork of selfish motivations (some not very conservative,) and will not be pure or solid in any way. It’s just winning, rather than losing. It ain’t politics if you never win.

RBMN on June 24, 2010 at 10:45 PM

You’ve knocked another one out of the park, Doc: two parts Paine with one part Reagan, I want to say, but I suppose that makes it uniquely yours.

You capture the impulse toward liberty as well as anyone writing today.

Pavel on June 24, 2010 at 10:59 PM

Its deconstruction will require the conviction and charisma of Sarah Palin, the brilliance of Bobby Jindal, the courage of New Jersey governor Chris Christie, and the enthusiasm of the primary winners from Tuesday night.

And even more importantly – real Americans need to get off their fat asses and get these people elected! Stop whining and knock on doors!

Squiggy on June 25, 2010 at 6:46 AM

you did say that even these Yeoman Republicans had “consensus building” to do before elections. Compromise is necessary to bring different factions together just as it is necessary to govern.

it is too much compromise that is destructive to our cause.

kelley in virginia on June 25, 2010 at 7:34 AM

The yeoman Republicans understand that building a consensus, through honest discussion with voters, is essential to carrying out the difficult work ahead.

This point deserves its own essay. As is, each reader would take it for what that reader wants, much like “change we can believe in”.

Produce the official Republican Party or Republican Senators or Congressmen statement that it is their first priority to repeal all of Obama’s legislation since become law.

It’s the tax payer grunts, the yeomen grumbling for repeal, with a vague echo from the Washingtonian Republicans. Our self invested “conservative” official leaders not only need to be told what to do, they need to be told exactly how to do it while a big stick enforces their accomplishment of duty to citizen constituents. Yeomen have yet to organize the ‘repeal Marxism from governance’ constitutional conservative lobby.

Just elect the Republicans into majority and all will be well again? It’s the first step. But as history shows, Republicans have yet to fight the winning legislative fight.

STIPULATE WHERE THE CUTS IN SPENDING WILL BE MADE. Otherwise, it’s more weakening DEBT. Eliminate the Dept. of Education and the Department of Homeland Security for starters, as if professionals or citizens need Uncle Marx in order to perform responsibilities effectively. Rather, the more bureaucracy, the less response from the professionals.

maverick muse on June 25, 2010 at 8:16 AM

And even more importantly – real Americans need to get off their fat asses and get these people elected! Stop whining and knock on doors!

Squiggy on June 25, 2010 at 6:46 AM

Yes! if we don’t do a lot better than in 08 the results will not be that much different.

neuquenguy on June 25, 2010 at 9:21 AM

There are two Republican parties, and both had a candidate on the 2008 presidential ticket. 
John McCain was the candidate of the thin-blooded aristocracy, tired men who dislike certain elements of their nominal constituency far more intensely than their political opposition.

It is my firm belief that when the Democrat National Socialist party implodes – as it inevitably will, as Statist regimes always inevitably implode – The left will gravitate to the Old Republican party and the right will move to a new Republican (Conservative) Party.

People will have to make a choice between a Squishy ‘moderate’ voice that is willing to compromise with the Statists or a party that will stick to the principles of a Limited, Constitutional government.

The choice will be to continue our greatness in a Representative republic or devolve into third world status with a mealy mouthed moderate outlook.

Chainsaw56 on June 25, 2010 at 10:06 AM

As excellent as ever.

Publish that book already, Doc!

Dark-Star on June 25, 2010 at 11:15 AM

But I’ll crap well, tomorrow.

heldmyw on June 24, 2010 at 9:58 PM

Of that we can all be sure, but why post about the only function that do competently while belaboring the obvious?

Great anlysis DZ, and I hope that the yoeman’s task is understood and undertaken by ever increasing numbers younger, middle class Americans.

ontherocks on June 25, 2010 at 12:02 PM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

Slow your roll, boss

Top Pick

“I’m bothered by the lack of emerging evidence…”

FIrst look at the Senate health bill

John Sexton Jun 21, 2017 9:21 PM

“the Senate bill would go farther than the House version in its approach to cutting Medicaid spending.”

Divide and conquer?

“If we do nothing, more companies will back out and more people will lose coverage.”

You know, I may have cracked the case for you, guys

“They’re still running against her and still winning races.”

“…the suspect is from Quebec and has a Canadian passport.”

When the Left lost their way on immigration

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 2:41 PM

It wasn’t all that long ago, really

“I personally watched some of these students go up to Chief Brown, right up to her face, and call her all kinds of names, cursing at her.”

Did the Queen “nix” a Trump visit to London?

Jazz Shaw Jun 21, 2017 12:41 PM

More like wishful thinking on the American left

Sometimes it’s hard. This was the hardest part

Did the polls get the Handel/Ossoff race wrong?

Allahpundit Jun 21, 2017 11:21 AM

Nah.

Physician, heal thyself

Maybe we’ll stay home and watch.

Good lack of work if you can get it

GOP takes 2 more special House races, meaning what?

Andrew Malcolm Jun 21, 2017 8:41 AM

Two more demoralizing moral victories for Dems.

Not a murder, but nearly as awful

GA Election results thread Update: Handel wins!

John Sexton Jun 20, 2017 7:10 PM

Late night?

7 p.m. ET: The election to end all elections

Allahpundit Jun 20, 2017 7:01 PM

Endgame.

Dashcam footage: The shooting of Philando Castile

Allahpundit Jun 20, 2017 6:31 PM

“Sir, I have to tell you that I do have a firearm on me.”

“Military personnel had to neutralize an individual.”

Because that’s pretty much the same thing, you see

“Now is the time to be more visible.”

“If you’re frustrated by the lack of transparency in this process, I share your frustration.”

Uh oh.

“No matter how radical, offensive, biased, prejudiced, fascist the program is?”

No regrets

And it’s not just your imagination

“The hopeless fear Warmbier is now experiencing is my daily reality…”

Kicking him when he’s down.

Of pigeons and terrorists

Jazz Shaw Jun 20, 2017 12:01 PM

A terrorist by any other name…

Some things require a sledgehammer, not a scalpel

Closing the gap.