Green Room

The Bully’s Pulpit

posted at 10:30 am on June 17, 2010 by

There is so much wrong with how Barack Obama has handled the Gulf oil spill, it’s almost hard to know where to begin.

Put aside the ineptitude of the approval process and clean up response. For today, I’m focusing on the tentative settlement with BP. While many will cheer the fact that BP has committed $20 billion to compensate people in the Gulf region, no one should cheer very loudly.

Another Blow To The Due Process Clause

I am hard pressed to come up with a constitutionally more chilling presidential comment than the following statement made by Barack Obama Tuesday night (emphasis mine):

Tomorrow, I will meet with the chairman of BP and inform him that he is to set aside whatever resources are required to compensate the workers and business owners who have been harmed as a result of his company’s recklessness.

Since when is a President’s wish our command? Under what legal authority did the “rule of law” President make the decision as to how much a private entity would pay and then “inform” the private party that it must obey or face the harsh retribution of the federal government?

This is similar to what happened to the bond holders in GM and Chrysler, whose private property rights were trampled in the name of Obama’s politics.

According to reports, BP also will pay compensation to people who lose their jobs not because of BP’s conduct, but because of the Obama administration’s policy decision to implement a drilling moratorium. We now have the specter of a private company being forced to pay for policy decisions.

Respect for the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment is what separates us from North Korea or Venezuela (emphasis mine):

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

It is beyond me how any person who claims to be a civil libertarian can support this administration. Put aside issues of Gitmo, rendition or other aspects of the war on terror.

When it comes to the foundation of our domestic freedom, Obama has trampled the Constitution with vigor and lack of concern.

One Week’s Worth of ObamaCare

The amount of money BP has committed over a multi-year period is roughly the equivalent of what the federal government will spend on ObamaCare in one week.

$20 billion is not chump change, by any means, and if actually paid promptly to people in the Gulf region will help ease some of the pain.

But don’t kid yourselves, this is not about money. If the federal government wanted to get aid to people right away, it could have used some of the unspent Stimulus Plan money, and then sought reimbursement from BP through the legal process.

How interesting that the President who cares not about running up trillion dollar deficits to fund his social vision now cares so deeply about saving the federal government what amounts to an ObamaCare rounding error.

This was a pure political power play, in which the President could create a demon, and deflect attention away from his own failing conduct with regard to the Gulf.

Hurry Up And Wait

If the Constitution means nothing to you, and all you want is retribution, you will be left very unsatisfied.

The claims procedures apparently have not yet been worked out in detail. But if the 9/11 claims process is any indication, the process will not be fast. And claimants will be limited to compensation for economic losses, which will require that individuals give up whatever other claims they may have.

End result is that I would be surprised to see much money put in anyone’s hands this calendar year.

A Nation of A Man, Not Laws

How often have you heard it said that we are a nation of laws, not men. But in the case of the Gulf claims process, we are a nation of one man, Kenneth Feinberg, who will determine all claims under $500,000.

No appeals, no second chances, not only for BP, but for individuals. The price of submitting to an arbitrary claims process is the loss of access to the judiciary and the legal process. That may be fine for many people, but it is a high price to pay as a nation supposedly of laws.

BP Will Be Happy

Many of you will think that I am defending BP, but that is not true. If anyone will be happy with the federalization of the claims process it will be BP. (Aside, BP is being represented by the ultimate Washington insider, Jamie Gorelick.)

BP is facing a financial death blow in the form of private lawsuits. Whether BP ultimately would succeed in defending those lawsuits based on federal liability caps is besides the point. The prospect of tens of thousands of lawsuits which might result in liability would haunt BP’s business and stock price for years.

And since BP made various federal and state filings with regard to its oil drilling, there is the prospect of criminal charges for fraud, filing false statements, and other crimes which, though a stretch, would put enormous pressure on BP.

This is similar to the situation faced by tobacco companies, which won almost all of the lawsuits taken to trial.

Investigations, and threatened criminal proceedings, combined with the mass tort lawsuits, led big tobacco to the conclusion that its survival as an industry depended upon coopting government through a slush fund. In the case of big tobacco, it was hundreds of billions of dollars, but it was a price worth paying because it ended the legal war and made government a partner, not an enemy.

You May Get What You Wished

This is a case where the imperial whim of the President, and the shrewd business acumen of BP, joined forces in the ultimate inside-the-beltway deal.

As they say, don’t wish too hard for something, you just got it.

Cross-posted with updates at Legal Insurrection Blog

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Has anyone in recent memory, ever seen the rule of law disregarded to this extent before?

rightside on June 17, 2010 at 11:04 AM

I teach a college level government class on Tuesday evenings, and had just listened to the speech before my class began. When my students asked me about it, my response was that the president gave a lousy speech in which he abrogated the Constitution and declared himself dictator.

Everybody laughed.

But I got several emails the next morning from students who noted that I wasn’t far off the mark.

RhymesWithRight on June 17, 2010 at 11:42 AM

Isn’t there ANYTHING we can do about this? I mean, other than wait two more years to vote him out while he finishes destroying our country?

Daggett on June 17, 2010 at 11:54 AM

BP stockholders need to hire as many lawyers as they can to stop this corp theft. Fire all the board members as they are not doing their duty to the corp. Dear leader has a plan and is going to use it to destroy our country one economic sector at a time.

Kissmygrits on June 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM

I think we could seriously see this guy impeached by the next Congress, even without a clearly Republican Senate. In fact it may be easier for moderate Republicans to get on board if its a bipartisan consensus.

joe_doufu on June 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM

Maybe after the new congress is sworn in January, the impeachment hearings can begin.

SnowSun on June 17, 2010 at 3:51 PM

For about the hundredth time, let me explain why the idle dream of getting rid of Teh Won through the impeachment process is near hopeless.

First, the rules:

An article of impeachment can be brought against him by a simple majority vote in the House. This might be doable in 2011 once a Republican majority is installed there.

A trial is then held in the Senate, with 67 votes required (2/3 majority) for a conviction. Under no circumstances will the Repubs hold 67 seats in 2011.

Next, the likelihood:

Clinton, with clear DNA evidence that he lied to Congress, received only 41 votes to convict in the Senate. This was in a Republican controlled Senate. Clinton served out the rest of his second term.

Conclusion:

Unless Teh Won does something that has the DEMS howling for impeachment, there is no point. The best hope is that he resigns ala Nixon; we all know he is far too self-centered to ever do that.

GnuBreed on June 18, 2010 at 12:55 AM

He won’t be impeached for one simple reason: no one would have the nerve to impeach the first black president, no matter how egregious his actions. Is that a racist thing to say? Certainly, but no more so than the cries of “racism” that would surely rise with the beginning of impeachment proceedings. How many cries of “fraud”, or how many riots might have ensued had Obama narrowly lost to McCain?
As for the Jesse Jackson-style shakedown of BP, taking names and kicking asses, along with seizing private companies and handing them over to the unions is pretty much his MO, now that he’s gotten away with it with GM. And the idiots and pundits like Bill O’Reilly who say that this is the way to deal with BP are no better than Bill Maher wanting his “black president” to go into meetings with a pistol under his shirt to emphasize his displeasure and desire to see things put right. Why not just chop off a finger and send it in an envelope to the board of directors? With the thugs running Washington, where’s “Snake Pliskin” when we need him?

tpitman on June 20, 2010 at 6:00 PM