Green Room

“It’s fair to say . . .”

posted at 10:14 am on June 12, 2010 by

That’s one of Obama’s little ways of prefacing a statement that will be very unfair indeed:

“I think it’s fair to say, if six months ago, before this spill had happened, I had gone up to Congress and I had said we need to crack down a lot harder on oil companies and we need to spend more money on technology to respond in case of a catastrophic spill, there are folks up there, who will not be named, who would have said this is classic, big-government overregulation and wasteful spending.”

Is this not laughable? He did nothing of the kind. There would have been no point, says he, because the GOP is so bound by ideology they wouldn’t have given his prescient urgings the time of day. But he’s not really claiming the thought even occurred to him. It’s just a fantasy scenario. You’ve got to wonder, can he hear himself? You’d think one of his handlers might clue him in that reflexive blame-avoidance is not an attractive trait. It makes you come across as a weasel.

Another breathtaking example of Obama’s “fairness”:

But to be fair, a good deal of the other party’s opposition to our agenda has also been rooted in their sincere and fundamental belief about the role of government. It’s a belief that government has little or no role to play in helping this nation meet our collective challenges. It’s an agenda that basically offers two answers to every problem we face: more tax breaks for the wealthy and fewer rules for corporations.

That’s fair? He goes on:

The last administration called this recycled idea ‘The Ownership Society.’ But what it essentially means is that everyone is on their own. No matter how hard you work, if your paycheck isn’t enough to pay for college or health care or childcare, well, you’re on your own. If misfortune causes you to lose your job or your home, you’re on your own. And if you’re a Wall Street bank or an insurance company or an oil company, you pretty much get to play by your own rules, regardless of the consequences for everybody else.

Keith Hennessey explicates:

The President sets up three straw men to make his case:

  1. Republicans want a Lord of the Flies-like anarchy.
  2. His critics claim the President wants socialism.
  3. We are coming out of a “lost decade” of failed economic policies that we must reject for the future.

The choice America faces, the President argues, is between no government and a reasonable balance.

The actual choice America faces is simply whether, compared to where we are now, we want bigger or smaller government. We are arguing about changes on the margin, not about a choice between anarchy and socialism.

Sigh. Obama’s use of straw men approaches addictive proportions. He’s even made one to stand in for himself when he senses some blame coming his way. Then he knocks him down and heads out for the next play, fundraiser, party, or whatever, sans souci.

Cross-posted at P&P.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

I wonder what Obama thinks the “never let it happen” 1990 OPA is all about?

It’s amazing that people like Obama think the answer to everything is anew law … I wants an investigation of MMS waivers for campaign cash. I bet that would be a very deep swamp.

tarpon on June 12, 2010 at 11:14 AM

We are arguing about changes on the margin, not about a choice between anarchy and socialism.

Hennessey may be right, but “changes on the margin” is neither what many others on the right accuse Obama of attempting, nor what they are promising or claiming to seek. A candidate speaking like Hennessey would face a Tea Party challenge and be hunted as a RINO.

CK MacLeod on June 12, 2010 at 12:41 PM

I think this president relies on such tactics far too much and I’m beginning to wonder if he doesn’t see these straw men as real people. I really hate to say it, but I think there is a real need to take a serious look at Obama’s psychological condition.

Believe me when I say that I do not suggest such a thing lightly. There comes a time, however, when you have to start asking yourself if there isn’t something seriously wrong. When you see the man on television clearly believing he and his gang were on task from day one, yet evidence clearly shows that not to be the case… it’s… well.. disturbing. From the beginning I have had absolutely no confidence in this president’s ability to do anything more than give speeches and screw things up. But the way things are now are far worse than I had imagined they could be.

This country is rapidly approaching a situation wherein we MUST have a leader, yet, as has been the case for the entire Obama presidency, there isn’t even an usher with a flashlight to guide us out of the burning building. To be honest, I think we’ve already shot past the edge of the cliff. Say what you will about the Bush/Cheney years, but I never found myself feeling as if there were no one navigating the ship of state. At least we always knew if we went down, Bush would be there, among the last men aboard, going down with the rest of us.

With Obama I get the feeling that not only is he unwilling to go down with the ship, but he’s already hopped off at the dock and is driving hell-for-leather inland so the resultant tidal wave of catastrophe doesn’t dirty his shiny shoes.

I’d bet if you asked the press and libs, they’d tell you they’re very well aware of how dire things are. And if you turned ’em around and checked their pockets, you’d probably find them stuffed with what little goodies they’ve been able to find before they begin their retreat inland. They’ve little or no interest in a successful America. There’s no headlines in it. Destruction and chaos is what sells newspapers and keeps viewers, hence their need to make up what they could not find during the Bush/Cheney years.

Loyalty used to mean something in this country. And while I realize that for conservatives, for the most part that is, it still does mean something. That said, we’re going to have to let this president battle his straw men and stick figures and go about our business taking control of things and putting the country back on track. We just can’t wait any longer in hope the man will change his ways.

I’m not so sure Obama would be mad if we did, after all, I’m sure he’s pretty freaked out having to look as if he’s busy doing the job he was elected for, all the while knowing he hasn’t a clue how to go about it.

Mad Mad Monica on June 13, 2010 at 3:13 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

“…the reality is the reality.”

Top Pick

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”

I could think of someone else you might want to ask about…

“You can ask a hundred people what hate speech is and you get a thousand different answers”