The Atlantic Has A Mess On Its Hands

posted at 6:48 pm on May 27, 2010 by

The Atlantic Magazine thought it would be able to speak poetic historical justice, by splashing the headline that the original reviled one, Kenneth Starr of Monica and Bill and Blue Dress and Impeachment fame, had been arrested for running a Ponzi Scheme.

Oh, the deep, deep satisfaction. They could feel it.  But it was premature.  And now The Atlantic editors have a mess on their hands.

Turns out that on the internet there is more than one Kenneth Starr, and the arrestee was not the tormentor of Bubba, but some guy with the name Kenneth Starr who ran a ponzi scheme. 

You see, even crackerjack journalists sometimes forget that in the billions of people in the universe, there is a chance that two such people have the same name.  And at Columbia School of Journalism, there is a special course on fact checking using Google and Yahoo.  But someone at The Atlantic didn’t take that course.

Here is The Atlantic’s original announcement and correction:

Somewhere, Bill Clinton is smiling. One-time special prosecutor who uncovered the dirty details of the former President’s affair with intern Monica Lewinsky has been engaged in some bad behavior of his own, according to the Justice Department and Securities and Exchange Commission.

Correction (~3:18pm): Apparently there are two famous Kenneth Starrs. The one charged is an investment advisor to the stars, but not the former special prosecutor. Apologies to Bill Clinton if we got his hopes up — and to the other Kenneth Starr.

I hope The Atlantic has learned a lesson all victims of fraud must learn: If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

Cross-posted with updates at Legal Insurrection Blog.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Well, that lesson, and if you’re going to report anything in print, have a really good legal staff. And hope the search engines have one too.

Robert17 on May 27, 2010 at 7:34 PM

For that matter, consider the logical incongruity of the very idea. Practicing attorneys like Ken Starr have very little time on their hands, certainly not enough to hatch a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme.

I mean, yeah, we have the Rothstein case, down here. But no one could ever figure out what he did for a living.

SWLiP on May 27, 2010 at 7:45 PM

It’s a good thing a blogger didn’t make that newbie mistake being like they don’t got no editors or research assistants and stuff like the big professional journalists who graduated college and work for magazines and newspapers have like, ya know.

erp on May 27, 2010 at 7:58 PM

It’s telling, isn’t it, that they offer the greater part of their apology to someone who wasn’t even harmed by their error at all & toss off only a grudgingly perfunctory nod to the former Special Prosecutor who actually was harmed by their ineptitude.

They couldn’t have made it more obvious that their professional negligence was predicated on their own wishful thinking as political partisans if they’d tried.

leilani on May 27, 2010 at 8:06 PM

Forget the ponzi scheme. Is Kenneth Star Trig’s real mother?

Mark1971 on May 27, 2010 at 8:07 PM

What do you expect from the rag that still carries Andrew Sullivan’s deranged rants?

rockmom on May 27, 2010 at 9:41 PM

Hmmmmm.

The Atlantic … too incompetent to use Google … for all your news requirements.

memomachine on May 28, 2010 at 7:50 AM

I guess they got all wee-wee’d up when they caught an “enemy” doing wrong. The evil Ken Starr ripping people off? RUN IT! RUN IT!

Deckard on May 28, 2010 at 8:43 AM

I’ll bet the editors of The Atlantic wondered what radio show they were going to listen to in the morning now, after those reports came out three years ago of the allegations against Anna Nicole Smith’s adviser Howard K. Stern…

jon1979 on May 28, 2010 at 9:26 AM

Who does their fact checking? Emily Litella?

DamnCat on May 28, 2010 at 12:46 PM

Attorney Starr ought to toss ‘em a little libel action; should be good for a yuk or two.

ya2daup on May 28, 2010 at 6:54 PM

It’s telling, isn’t it, that they offer the greater part of their apology to someone who wasn’t even harmed by their error at all & toss off only a grudgingly perfunctory nod to the former Special Prosecutor who actually was harmed by their ineptitude.

They couldn’t have made it more obvious that their professional negligence was predicated on their own wishful thinking as political partisans if they’d tried.

leilani on May 27, 2010 at 8:06 PM

Beat me to it.

What jerks.

inviolet on May 28, 2010 at 8:04 PM

Wouldn’t it be weird if somewhere there was another Atlantic magazine, and it wasn’t dedicated to publishing tripe for the DNC?

drunyan8315 on May 31, 2010 at 1:27 PM