Green Room

Breathe easy, Establishment: the MSM still controls the Narrative (even on Climategate)

posted at 1:27 pm on May 27, 2010 by

That’s one of the lessons from a new study by Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism. Among its findings:

While social media players espouse a different agenda than the mainstream media, blogs still heavily rely on the traditional press – and primarily just a few outlets within that – for their information. More than 99% of the stories linked to in blogs came from legacy outlets such as newspapers and broadcast networks. And just four – the BBC, CNN, the New York Times and the Washington Post accounted for fully 80% of all links. (Emphasis added.)

Conversely, the relationship between Old and New Media is still very much a one-way street:

Across the entire year studied, just one particular story or event – the controversy over emails relating to global research that came to be known as “Climate-gate” – became a major item in the blogosphere and then, a week later, gaining more traction in traditional media.

To put things in perspective, the “traction” was that Climategate was one of three stories that made global warming the third biggest story in the establishment media that week. In contrast, Climategate was the fifth bloggiest story of 2009.

The PEJ study illustrates the vacuity of the complaint that Climategate was overhyped, which later gets lumped into the category of “overhyped or bogus,” as though they are the same thing (For an exploration of the establishment’s hypocrisy on the latter, especially the floating of conspiracy theories, read Ace on the notion of the “neutral story line.”). Had the blogosphere not worked the Climategate story as hard as it did, the establishment likely would have ignored it entirely, in a repeat of the clueless, partisan-looking coverage of other stories originating in the conservative media.

The dismissive coverage of Climategate — and related stories detailing flaws and inaccuraces by the IPCC — by America’s establishment media stands in marked contrast to the coverage given these stories in France and Britain. Some people might look at that gap and ask why the center-left establishment media in America is the exception. Those people do not work at the New York Times, which is blaming the British coverage for the fact that public opinion polling shows people taking global warming less seriously, not only in the UK, but also in the US and Germany.

In NYT-land, the problem is that the public “has eagerly consumed a series of revelations that were published prominently in right-leaning newspapers like The Times of London and The Telegraph and then repeated around the world.” In reality, the story was widely covered across the political spectrum, including a 12-part special investigation by the Guardian that got more critical as it went along.

Indeed, the NYT blandly asserts that “[t]wo independent reviews later found no evidence that the East Anglia researchers had actively distorted climate data, but heavy press coverage had already left an impression that the scientists had schemed to repress data,” hoping the reader won’t notice that the first and second accusations are not mutually exclusive. In contrast, the Guardian called one of these reviews a “rush to judgment” that “dodged key questions” about the scandal. Of course, the Guardian could have been even more critical, but the fact that the American establishment media was far more dismissive says much about where real epistemic closure and political cocooning may be found on this story.

The NYT’s theory is also undermined by the PEJ study. The NYT’s news coverage is just as easily consumed around the world via the Internet as the Times of London, and gets as many links in the blogosphere as the entire British media, excepting only the BBC. Maybe the problem is that even the BBC was running stories about the shoddy computer code the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit used to crank out its dire projections. Or maybe public opinion about global warming is influenced less by the reportage (which varied across nations) and more by the recession felt worldwide. After all, people tend to prioritize the urgent over the important. And people worldwide just witnessed their governments and their financial institutions do the same.

So the good news for the establishment media is that their tiny clique is still controlling the Narrative and almost entirely excluding alternatives. The bad news (for them) is that they cannot force their audiences to buy into that Narrative when reality dictates other priorities.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Apparently this i8us why all the polls go south on the establishment. Talking through their hats.

tarpon on May 27, 2010 at 2:34 PM

New York Times=Fifth Column Treasonous Socialist Propaganda Organ Media. By the grace of God the American people are finally starting to wake up and accept the truth, and the truth is that the Fifth Column Treasonous Socialist Propaganda Organ Media cannot be trusted to tell you what day of the week it is let alone anything that is genuinely serious.

doriangrey on May 28, 2010 at 6:03 PM

The bad news (for them) is that they cannot force their audiences to buy into that Narrative when reality dictates other priorities anyone to buy their product. Period.

ya2daup on May 28, 2010 at 6:59 PM

@ Karl (and others…)

Admittedly a pet peeve of mine, buuuuuut…

Could you please stop applying the Leftist vocabulary of
“***-gate”
and utilize a term a tad more balanced, if not shamelessly Dem-damning?

Sure, Nixon’s act(s) were wrong (or, is that “so 70’s”?), but that does not mean “we” have to keep applying “their” terminology.

Lockstein13 on May 28, 2010 at 7:15 PM

Lockstein13 on May 28, 2010 at 7:15 PM,

I appreciate your distaste for -gate, but:

1. I didn’t coin the term “Climategate”; and

2. Substituting something like “the UEA CRU e-mail scandal” would end up making the piece read even more clunky than it does now.

Incidentally, there are folks on the Left who aren’t keen on -gate either, arguing that applying it as freely as we do now diminishes Watergate.

Karl on May 28, 2010 at 10:16 PM

They may still control the narrative, but they don’t control the meaning of it any more. People aren’t buying into Climate Change alarmism any more, and they’re catching on to how much our environmental laws are squeezing our costs of living and our jobs. They’re not blaming everything on greedy capitalists either, as is shown by the reaction to government bailouts extended to companies being drowned in labor union pensions and benefits. They don’t care for Wall St. bankers, either, but that doesn’t make Obama’s ties with Big Labor and Big Environmentalism any more attractive.

We all ought to understand that whether its the rich liberals or the rich conservatives, they aren’t the ones who will pay off our national debt, unless we get them invested in money making and tax paying ventures. The more they put into “charities” like the Sierra Club and other liberal causes, the less they pay toward keeping the country afloat.

flataffect on May 29, 2010 at 2:14 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

“This isn’t going to get a lot cheaper, it can’t, it won’t.”

Top Pick

“…what we failed to achieve with votes, we would do with weapons.”

“[S]o dumb it’s amazing we even have to have the conversation.”

“It was not necessary.”

“You’re inflaming everyone right here right now with those words!”

“Trump’s people said, ‘We’ll be writing the speech that the President’s Audio-Animatronic figure will be saying.'”

Excuses, excuses.

Not really a “kill all the lawyers” scenario

4 pm ET!

“it has not taken serious steps to end its own complicity in trafficking, including forced laborers from North Korea.”

Currently doing a search for “good international trade lawyers”

Ransomware attack spreads through Europe

John Sexton Jun 27, 2017 1:01 PM

“A massive ransomware campaign is currently unfolding worldwide.”

At least their address rarely changes

It just keeps on happening

“Trump is good for business right now.”

Start spreading the news…

“Now it’s time for the next step.”

A “cryptic” warning to Bashar al-Assad?

Jazz Shaw Jun 27, 2017 8:01 AM

The three strikes rule may be in effect

CNN reporters resign over retracted story

John Sexton Jun 26, 2017 9:21 PM

“The individuals all stated that they accepted responsibility and wanted to resign.”

Federalism’s greatest champion is now …

Ed Morrissey Jun 26, 2017 8:41 PM

“In the end, we’re a democracy.”

“Almost all controversial speech harms people, upsets or offends them…”

Obama: Back home again in Indonesia

Andrew Malcolm Jun 26, 2017 7:21 PM

The call to prayer and eating dog.

Testing the waters.

“primarily because the penalty for not having insurance would be eliminated.”

“If I were a Seattle lawmaker, I would be thinking hard about the $15 an hour phase-in.”

Days of future past

“Not only are taxpayers footing the bill, but people are dying unnecessarily because of this.”

Israel settles who can stand where at the Western Wall

Andrew Malcolm Jun 26, 2017 3:21 PM

Women to the right, men to the left.

Look on the bright side. There’s less snow in the summer

Big win … but for how long?

“Several Russian cities have unveiled monuments to Stalin in recent months.”

Massive disappointment

Emboldened conservative wing?

It’s more about the powers of the Presidency at this point

A second look at paper ballots?

Jazz Shaw Jun 26, 2017 10:41 AM

Low tech solutions to high tech crime