Apple Denies Free Speech to Republican in CA-30

posted at 1:40 am on May 19, 2010 by
[ Political Correctness ]   

See what you think, readers.  Congressional candidate Ari David, Republican for California-30, asked Apple to create an iPhone app for his campaign to unseat Henry Waxman in November.  (Check out his website here.)

Ari David and Tony Katz just want to have fun (at Tea Party May 2009)

Apple came back to him with the judgment that the information he wanted to include about Waxman was “defamatory,” and therefore Apple couldn’t accept his business.

But read the story for yourselves.  (Read it if only for the idiotic farming regulations California farmers are already living with, which Waxman wants to impose on the rest of America’s farmers.)

Read it also, however, for the posture assumed by Apple.  Nothing in the proposed app’s content could reasonably be called defamatory.  Some of it is clearly opinion (e.g., the farm regulations are “Soviet-style”).  But when did charging a politician with wanting to “strangle family farms with Soviet-style regulation” become defamatory?  It’s partisan political speech, yes.  But that doesn’t make it defamatory.

Truth about Henry Waxman is..."Defamatory!"

Gateway Pundit, breaking the story, asked if Apple is going to ban conservatives from using their products next.  I suspect there is more here than merely reflexive partisanship at Apple, however.  What I smell is the fear of (a) lawsuit and (b) regulatory retaliation by Waxman.

This is a lovely teachable moment, because it highlights what an overly regulatory, overly litigious state can do to you.  It doesn’t have to come out in the open and make laws against you and your opinions.  All it needs is the category of regulation that might get someone you want to do business with in trouble.  (The lawyers will take care of the rest.)  And it needs unaccountable agencies through which to act.  There are probably three dozen agencies, just at the federal level, that could be used to torture Apple in the back room, far away from any media coverage or recourse with the public.

Does Henry Waxman, who’s been in Congress since January 1975 and chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee, have ways to sic the Feds on Apple?  You bet he does.

That’s our America in 2010, folks.  If we want to change it, we couldn’t start with a better move than replacing Henry Waxman with Ari David.  In the meantime, decorating Apple’s face with egg will go a long way.  Pass it on.

Cross-posted at The Optimistic Conservative.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

uuh… yeah.. I don’t get the problem with this at all..

make a WEB APP!! (Like kd6rxl said above.) Its just a mobile version of your website that iphones can read and add to their “apps” without making an approved app. then everyone can just add the button to their iphone and viola!
SPEAKING OF WHICH… UH when is HOTAIR going to have a Mobile version???????????????

I have been waiting for this forevah… FOR EV AH!!!

johnnyboy on May 19, 2010 at 5:56 PM

Given Waxman’s huge ego and short fuse, I can’t blame Apple for not wanting to provoke him. Which is a great reason to donate money to Waxman’s opponent.

LASue on May 19, 2010 at 6:12 PM

Well count me in on a boycott with Apple. I’ll buy no Apple products of any kind for the next year.

This will change their sales number by $0.00. (or is that -$0.00 I forget)

I hate it when there’s a boycott of someone and I can’t play, and it happens a lot. I clearly don’t buy enough crap.

gekkobear on May 19, 2010 at 6:24 PM

Perhaps Verizon will donate a Droid, to Ari David’s campaign, with a special campaign app.

mtb on May 19, 2010 at 6:58 PM

Apple Denies Free Speech to Republican in CA-30

blogger denies apple the freedom to publish what they want on their device.

sesquipedalian on May 19, 2010 at 4:49 PM

How has he denied Apple that ability? All he’s done is point out their practices so that people may then make an informed decision about the company when it comes to doing business with them.

Do you not see the difference? Do you not see how one is in fact a denial of access and the other simply a communication of the company’s practices?

If Apple sends the police to kick down your door (after their goons fail to intimidate you at your door) looking for a cell phone lost by a drunk at a bar you might rethink your feelings toward this company and its practices.

TheBigOldDog on May 19, 2010 at 8:51 PM

Comment pages: 1 2