Green Room

The Reasonable Cost of Drilling For Oil

posted at 1:44 pm on April 30, 2010 by

The Gulf of Mexico oil spill is a catastrophe.   It’s literally going to make large swaths of the coastline and wetlands a disaster area.  It’s also part of the reasonable cost of drilling for oil, and Obama’s order to shut down all new American drilling is shortsighted and foolish.   (The Russians, Chinese, and other countries will continue new drilling in the Gulf, regardless.)   So impulsively shutting down new drilling certainly doesn’t do anything to protect our coasts.  It just means that every day we wait, America will have less of a share of the oil off our own coast.

A little perspective is in order: the reason this is such a shocking disaster is precisely because this sort of thing is so rare.  I’m not insensitive to how it’s going to affect the Gulf Coast.  I live here.  I’ve got shrimpers and fishermen in my family.  And I promise you, in spite of this awful accident, we don’t want drilling shut down.  Most people want it expanded.  We need the jobs, the country needs the oil, and the federal government, with its massive spending binge, would surely like to have the revenue.  A little known fact: other states split drilling revenue 50-50 with the federal government.  Louisiana, on the other hand, has never received that.   We’re fighting just to get to  37.5%.   And even that doesn’t start until 2017.

Conservatives chant “Drill, baby, drill!” because we know that right now, oil is the most cost-effective form of energy available.  We think it’s great that research is being done into green energy.  We’d love it if hydrogen fuel cells, the wind and the sun could power how we live.  But they can’t right now.  So we need to continue drilling for oil, because these sort of accidents are part of the cost of doing business just as Chernobyl was part of the cost of nuclear energy.

At some point soon they’ll stop the thousands of gallons of oil per day from spilling into the Gulf.  Some fish, birds, and assorted critters will die – others will be saved with the help of volunteers, just like they were after the Exxon Valdez disaster.  The coastline will be cleaned, and the tourism and fishing industries will eventually come back and wildlife will return to the affected areas.  We’ll figure out what caused the explosion on the rig, and try to prevent it from happening again.  We’ll learn new lessons about how to prevent spills and how to mitigate the damage when the do happen.  And we’ll keep drilling – or we should.  Because the last thing we need in this train wreck of an economy is higher energy prices.

ADDED: Politics of fear – AP plays the otter card and Ace sums up:

It’s the childishness of this all though that bothers me, the refusal to accept the simple proposition that in life, there are choices, and choices have consequences, and sometimes it’s necessary to accept some downside to get a lot of upside. People don’t seem to acknowledge the upside of petroleum — like being able to drive places, or having heat and electricity in their homes, and so on — because it “just happens,” by magic, I guess.

On the other hand, show them a dying otter and they want to stop this all.

Crossposted.

Added x2: If you’re in the Gulf Coast area and you want to volunteer to help with the cleanup, register here.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Ah. The sweet smell of sanity!

RegularJoe on April 30, 2010 at 2:10 PM

We’ll figure out what caused the explosion on the rig, and try to prevent it from happening again.

Amen. DH works engineering support for rig design. The Health, Safety, and Environmental (HSE) guys are already making passes, reviewing and re-reviewing safety mechanisms built into the current project. I can’t imagine it’s an isolated occurrence; everyone is paying closer attention to their systems, even those already well within spec. Some of those specs might even change before we know what really happened. It will be interesting to see this ripple across the industry.

ScaryBiscuits on April 30, 2010 at 2:14 PM

…Or we could play the same game:

Since Congress and the President have messed up so much, NO more drilling into my pocket to fix the problems they’ve created.

SnowSun on April 30, 2010 at 2:47 PM

What I want to know is this the result of a failed shut off valve or is the blow out further down in the hole and the flow of oil is bypassing that shutoff valve. It will be months before we find out.

Skandia Recluse on April 30, 2010 at 3:27 PM

Obama’s order to shut down all new American drilling is shortsighted and foolish.

You’re forgetting the Obama administration’s motto: “Never let a crisis go to waste.”

logis on April 30, 2010 at 4:15 PM

Not only will this be an attack by the enviro-left on the energy industry, but this will be a political attack on Sarah Palin and anybody who agrees with her.

Wait, that is already happening, even here.

Brian1972 on April 30, 2010 at 4:32 PM

There’s more toxic waste and energy killers in DC than in all the oil spills in history.

Robert17 on April 30, 2010 at 5:34 PM

The enviro-left has about as much sympathy for the eleven human beings who lost their lives in this tragedy as I do for the animals which are going to die. It’s easy to see where their priorities lie… and sad.

Laura on April 30, 2010 at 5:43 PM

Where’s the Federal Response for the Disaster that is abot to befall the Gulf Coast States… Hummm…. How many days have passed

roflmao

donabernathy on April 30, 2010 at 6:40 PM

Skandia Recluse on April 30, 2010 at 3:27 PM

I think it’s safe to assume the problem is downhole. If the wellhead was intact we’d be talking about the safety features it has.

ericdijon on April 30, 2010 at 9:53 PM

Here’s what went wrong.

Laura on April 30, 2010 at 10:32 PM

The offshore oil industry is the most safety oriented business, period. No work can commence without a written work permit and a Job Safety Environmental Assessment. All work follows a written procedure and must be approved and signed off by the responsible parties and those actually performing the tasks. This goes for any task from scrubbing the decks to using explosives to perforate the well. There are daily safety meetings, weekly muster and abandon boat drills, and supplemental safety meetings as needed.There is an active observation program where all workers make written observations (good as well as bad)that are then assessed by the Health, Safety, Environment (HSE) team. These observations are used to improve the effeciency and safety of the work. Anyone can stop the job. It might cost millions of dollars, but all work stoppages are taken seriously. If a task is not fully understood, is a safety hazzard, or someone is not comfortable performing it, they are expected to stop the job and will suffer no repercussions. It is a dangerous business. One can minimize and reduce the risks; however, it is impossible to eliminate the risks. That is just a simple fact of life. I sometimes wonder how any work ever gets done because of the safety requirements. I will not hesitate to continue working offshore in the Gulf of Mexico because I know that every effort is made to make it a safe working environment.

DAT60A3 on April 30, 2010 at 11:36 PM

Here’s what went wrong.

Laura on April 30, 2010 at 10:32 PM

Really? I’m thinking a slightly different reason than the picture offered. At 210,000 gallons/day, this ain’t no stripper well; this bore is under its own pressure. I suggest that the wellhead blew and obviously made it to the surface before any of the hundreds of redundant safety mechanisms kicked in and/or the formation fluid was just that nasty that nothing could cope with it. If it really is just the riser leaking then I further suggest that the picture would describe workover rigs coming to the rescue.

I don’t think that any of the crew made a single error other than career choice. I suspect there will be a truther movement – I will not follow. I really think this play is just so active and unknown and the restrictions on exploring the play have curtailed the knowledge gathering of its nuances. In other words, it is the governmental restrictions that actually caused the blowout. .

ericdijon on May 1, 2010 at 8:54 AM

eric – well, okay. I’m certainly no expert on oil rigs, just passing along what I read. I agree the governmental restrictions are unhelpful in the big picture of safe exploration. Oil companies have a vested interest in safe development; rather than enhance that interest and essentially partner with the companies to further a common goal, government gets adversarial. I’ve never been out on a rig but I’ve spent *considerable* time in refineries doing on site technical writing, and I know that’s how it is for them.

What’s brewing right now is that Halliburton had cemented it about 20 hours before the explosion. The left’s pit bull jaws will lock on that detail and it will become an exercise in blameshifting rather than really getting to the truth.

Laura on May 1, 2010 at 10:58 AM

I am sick and tired of the tyranny of the minority. These enviroactivists that have stopped energy production in the US are ruining the prospect of future prosperity. Not only are they champions of government intervention into every aspect of private life, they cause increases in cost at every level of production, similar to a VAT. They are to be loathed. The rising cost of energy has lowered my lifestyle.

These luddites and their ceaseless lawsuits need to be stopped at all costs.

Inanemergencydial on May 1, 2010 at 12:07 PM

“Obama’s order to shut down all new American drilling is shortsighted and foolish. ”

NO, IDIOT. DO YOU READ ENGLISH???????

From your own f’ing link:
——-
“All he has said is that he’s not going to continue the moratorium on drilling but… no additional drilling has been authorized and none will until we find out what happened here and whether there was something unique and preventable here”
-Axelrod
———

Until acoustic switch emergency shut down mechanisms are installed on all rigs, then yeah you need to shut them the f*ck down.

Get you head out of your a$$.

Dave Rywall on May 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM

Points off your reading comprehension, Dave – and for incivility. From your own quote – what part of

no additional drilling has been authorized and none will until we find out what happened here

are you having trouble understanding? They should not stop or slow drilling. Other countries certainly are not stopping their drilling in the Gulf. Additional drilling should be authorized, and plans should continue going forward for new drilling. It’s an extremely lengthy process. Whatever we learn in terms of safety issues can be applied as we go forward, but it’s stupid and pointless to just stop whatever is in progress for new drilling. The economy is collapsing; unemployment is at or near 20% in more than one state, and we cannot afford higher energy costs right now.

What does your computer run on, unicorn power? What do you think gets your groceries to the store, fairy dust? Petroleum is a necessary ingredient to keep our society going, and we should drill it ourselves, here at home.

Laura on May 2, 2010 at 3:25 PM

Only a complete fu*king moron would say, after an accident causing a bigger spill than the Valdez, carry on with the drilling lads – your equipment seems to be working fine.

Only a complete fu*king moron wouldn’t call for a thorough investigation of what happened to find out if wells need more failsafe shut down apparatus. WHICH THEY FU*KING DO.

Hmmm let’s see some bits from here:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704423504575212031417936798.html

“BP says the Deepwater Horizon did have a “dead man” switch, which should have automatically closed the valve on the seabed in the event of a loss of power or communication from the rig. BP said it can’t explain why it didn’t shut off the well”

Gee maybe that’s something that SHOULD BE LOOKED INTO

The rig “didn’t have a remote-control shut-off switch used in two other major oil-producing nations as last-resort protection against underwater spills.”

Gee maybe that bit of equipment SHOULD BE REQUIRED -which costs about half a million dollars. Last time I checked, $500,000 is a lot smaller cost than replacing the rig (560 million), billions in clean up and staggering environmental damage.

You should be outraged that the well couldn’t be shut off – but your reaction: a bed wetting partisan rant blaming Obama for taking precautions.

Dave Rywall on May 2, 2010 at 4:21 PM

Speaking of bed wetting partisan rants, Dave, I suggest you switch to decaf. Your hysteria is amusing, but if the best arguments you’ve got are ALL CAPS, masked profanity, partisan insults, and misrepresenting what I wrote, then you’re not doing too well here. Please show where I said there should be no investigation. In fact, I specifically said

We’ll figure out what caused the explosion on the rig, and try to prevent it from happening again. We’ll learn new lessons about how to prevent spills and how to mitigate the damage when the do happen.

But bottom line, there is no method of getting energy that is entirely safe. Equipment fails, people make mistakes, stuff happens. That’s how life works. You’re a child, and an ignorant, foolish, rude child at that.

Laura on May 2, 2010 at 5:01 PM

Bottom line is you’re clueless.

You should be outraged that the safeguards that would have prevented this catastrophe were not required by law. But you’re not. You shrug it off and spend your energy trying to find a way to blame Obama for something/anything. So useless.

Dave Rywall on May 2, 2010 at 9:13 PM

With all of the evidence 5,000 feet below the surface and the rig destroyed by an explosion and massive fire, the cause of the explosion is currently unknown and may never be known. There are a bunch of theories, but theories are only guesses based on incomplete data. There are many different types of safety equipment by different manufacturers designed to do the same thing. Equipment that is fully tested at the surface may fail subsea without any warning or known reason. The conditions at 5,000 feet of water are extreme. The weight and pressure of the water, the corrosivity of salt water, flaws in materials that went undetected through the very thorough testing process all are variables. The pressure of the confined gas and oil in the well can easily exceed 10,000 PSI. We have to continue to improve and learn from any source available. To shut down drilling and production based on insufficient data is taking a step backwards. We are dependent of petroleum for everything from energy, to petrochemicals, to polymers. The computers we are using are partly petroleum. Can we survive without the petroleum product known as plastic? The tires on our cars are petroleum products. The list is endless. Think of the millions of jobs that would be effected. Just about every job here in the United States would feel the effect.

DAT60A3 on May 2, 2010 at 10:22 PM

What’s to worry about? The Russians and Chinese can drill it for us.

Dave Rywall on May 2, 2010 at 4:21 PM

Get some manners.

AshleyTKing on May 3, 2010 at 12:01 AM