When you use the enemy’s own preferred nomenclature to refer to them, you only undermine your own position.

Leftists love to assign themselves names that are antonyms of their true character. Why do you think they call themselves “progressives” and “liberals?”

Instead of calling these people “feminists,” how about calling them what they really are: misandristic head cases

I like your posts and hope you’ll continue with them.

Doesn’t mean she agrees with it, just that the law should be consistent.

If a woman can have an abortion without the consent of the father, then why can’t the father do the same thing to her?

I have thought about this and it is a puzzler regardless your feelings on abortion. This will be an interesting case to watch.

Just remember, if feminists had their way, he’d be getting off scot-free.

Not if she was my daughter.

In the last few days the ‘picking a fight’ behaviors of various progressivist groups made me think about the human propensity for achievement in battle to turn into overreach because it’s preferrable to keep fighting vs. disbanding th…

I’m not sure I’d be surprised to hear a feminist respond that it’s murder because the mother-to-be wanted the child to be born. That’s sort of standard fare by now, no?

DrSteve on April 7, 2010 at 11:56 AM

No, it’s murder because a state legislature or Congress passed a law stating it is murder. And most statutes frame it as the mother did not give consent.

Unfortunately, no one linked the Pa statute for this. These laws are nothing new. California has had theirs on the books for 40 years now.

I’m not sure I’d be surprised to hear a feminist respond that it’s murder because the mother-to-be wanted the child to be born. That’s sort of standard fare by now, no?

DrSteve on April 7, 2010 at 11:56 AM

Yes because liberalism places the self-actualisation of individual desires higher than anything else.

Without her knowing it, Tercero put one pill in her vagina…

WTF ?

Nihilistic. Void of conscience. The man should never see daylight again except from behind bars. (It’s a miracle that they charged him with murder – death penalty will not happen, no chance at all.)

I am attempting to wrap my mind around the idea of a man pulling a two-year affair on his fiancee, and then murdering his unborn child to cover his tracks. The mind reels.

Less than worthless. Inhuman. I think the feminists might throw something halfhearted out before long, seeing as how she was violated – but it will be nothing more than a gesture. Infant killed, man under murder charges – doesn’t play well into the abortion paradise of the Left.

I feel sick now and it’s only nine in the morning.

Just remember, if feminists had their way, he’d be getting off scot-free.

That’s going too far, IMHO. They wouldn’t want him scot free, but just charged with something less than murder — probably a misdemeanor battery charge or something like that.

Without question this guy’s conduct is utterly reprehensible and I’m glad to see that the PA authorities are throwing the book at him (at least so far). It will be interesting to see how this plays out in court. I just hope the MSM actually covers this case although I suspect they will give it a low profile at most.