The Terms of the Deal

posted at 10:44 pm on March 18, 2010 by

This weekend may see the fateful vote on ObamaCare, or it may be passed with twilight’s last deeming. There is not much time left for Americans to consider what is about to be done to them, and raise their voices in a protest loud enough to frighten nervous Democrats out of their parliamentary maneuvers. The ruling class wants this bill badly enough to interpret anything less than fierce protest as implied consent.

Even discounting the sewer system of underhanded deals and bribes needed to push ObamaCare through Congress, distorting it beyond any semblance of a carefully-designed plan, it’s foolish to accept it as a “solution” to health care “problems.” No government program is a solution to anything. I’m not referring to their inefficiency or cost. I’m talking about their very nature.

A government program is not a carefully-designed system, or even an enduring commitment. It is a promise. Systems require discipline. For example, the operation of an aircraft carrier is a very complex system, which relies upon many individuals to perform carefully-defined duties. Failure to perform these duties results in punishment or dismissal. All of the crew members understand this, so the system is reliable. When the captain orders a fighter to launch, he knows the deck crew and pilot will quickly obey. The crew and pilot, in turn, know that the captain would not order a launch for no good reason. Everything happens with speed, efficiency, and precision, because the system is illuminated by trust.

Government social programs don’t work that way. They can’t. Today’s Congress cannot bind future sessions with discipline. They can only saddle their successors with obligations. The national debt has grown to staggering proportions because debt is the only thing each new Administration and Congress inherit from those who went before.

When Barack Obama tries to convince you to accept a government takeover of the health-care industry, he is making a promise he won’t be around to keep. ObamaCare’s job-killing taxes are front-loaded, but in order to fool the Congressional Budget Office into giving it a respectable deficit score, its benefits are delayed for years. Even if Obama wins re-election, he would complete his second term long before the program was completely phased in… and no external authority exists to compel either Obama, or his successors, to honor the promises he’s been making.

Consider the question of public funding for abortion, which has led Democrat representative Bart Stupak and his little bloc of pro-life colleagues to withhold their support. They are ostensibly holding out for guarantees against government-funded abortions, but the odds that ObamaCare will never cover abortions are exactly zero. It’s simply a question of when, not if. Once the government controls the health-care industry, there is nothing to prevent Democrats from paying for any service their constituents demand. A future law funding abortion can easily be passed, or maybe even “deemed” into existence. Abortion advocates can use lawsuits to squeeze funding out of the government. Control of the health-insurance industry will give the government massive leverage to erode determined public resistance against any steps it wishes to take.

Think about the evolution of ObamaCare health insurance into single-payer socialized medicine, something Obama and the Democrats quietly promise to left-wing audiences. The government will have every incentive to press for this transformation, and arrange it by pushing private competitors out of the market, then presenting single-payer government health care as tomorrow’s “solution” to the problem they’re working to create today. There is nothing to stop them from doing this.

The only guarantee you have that ObamaCare will provide the promised benefits, and remain within its boundaries, is the trust you place in the word of Barack Obama and his party… and your faith in future politicians who have yet to be elected.

It is madness to extend such trust to the party of Charlie Rangel, John Conyers, Nancy Pelosi, Christopher Dodd, Barney Frank, and Harry Reid. There is no reason to trust an administration that places billions of dollars into the hands of unaccountable “czars,” including the odd Communist. Only a fool would believe the endless string of lies and deception from this President will magically transform into honesty and fidelity, after his angry demands for more power are fulfilled. A party that openly plans to subvert what little power remains in the tattered Constitution will not become more lawful after it seizes control of an entire industry. It would be idiotic to believe that a government whose economic projections have never come close to reality can suddenly predict the costs of the most enormous program it has ever produced. Remember, this Administration’s idea of a “system working” consists of frantic airline passengers tackling a terrorist seconds before his underwear detonates.

It would also be foolish to place such faith in Republicans, or anyone else. Today’s Democrats are not unique in their corruption, a cancer that can be driven into remission with electoral chemotherapy in 2010 and 2012. Massive government breeds massive corruption through its very nature – it is the predictable behavior of people who are no less greedy, ambitious, or deceitful that the most rapacious robber baron. They hide their avarice behind masks of finely chiseled sanctimony, but as the final maneuvers toward the passage of ObamaCare illustrate, they’re just as quick to bend rules and perpetrate fraud as any white-collar criminal.

It would be a horrible mistake to accept a deal with the creators of history’s most staggering natonal debt, based on assurances they will place your interests ahead of theirs, for decades to come. As Darth Vader memorably explained to Lando Calrissian, the State can always alter the terms of the deal, and your only recourse will be praying they don’t alter it any further.

Cross-posted at www.doczero.org.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Comment pages: 1 2

Today’s Congress cannot bind future sessions with discipline.

One of the down sides of our republican form of government. Another is as the government-orchestrated money transfers and welfare spending that is nothing but vote-buying for incumbents. Almost enough to make you wish for a good monarch sometimes. Now if we could just find a way to guarantee a perpetual line of good and wise kings…

David Shane on March 18, 2010 at 11:04 PM

As Darth Vader memorably explained to Lando Calrissian, the State can always alter the terms of the deal, and your only recourse will be praying they don’t alter it any further.

Mmm…I love me some Star Wars reference!

gryphon202 on March 18, 2010 at 11:55 PM

What he said.

Doc, wouldn’t you love to be a fly on the wall in the Obamacare meetings? You gotta believe that if the deals we’re hearing about, that are in writing, are corrupt and sanctimonious, what are we not hearing about? Reading some of the Bill yesterday, it is clear that this abomination has been expanded upon from the previous two. Treason, my friend, treason is hidden in the web. And although it’s not clear who the beneficiaries will ultimately be, it is clear that it won’t be to the benefit of Freedom.

Robert17 on March 19, 2010 at 5:14 AM

Next time, look at character.

tarpon on March 19, 2010 at 5:49 AM

Almost enough to make you wish for a good monarch sometimes

NO. It makes me wish for the rebirth of Davey Crockett and Horatio Bunce.

http://www.juntosociety.com/patriotism/inytg.html

single stack on March 19, 2010 at 8:05 AM

Massive government breeds massive corruption through its very nature

Never has this been driven home so thoroughly as with the passage of this health care bill. Our ‘leaders’ in DC, which includes the WH in spades, are living examples of what our government should not be but what we have let it become. Off with their heads and as quickly as possible. What’s more, and what’s worse, if they have even the slightest inkling of who and what they’ve become they are covering it very well. They are justifying their shameful behavior by GOP shameful behavior in the past. The GOP probably deserves that rebuke, but several wrongs never make a right. If we look shameful and small in the eyes of the world we deserve every criticism we get and more. Either that or those same countries are doubled over with laughter!! If we are on the down side of world leadership, we know where to place the blame.

jeanie on March 19, 2010 at 8:09 AM

As Mark Steyn has remarked several times, once this health care take over is passed the republicans will be reduced to arguing that they can administer the program better than the democrats.

Skandia Recluse on March 19, 2010 at 8:52 AM

A future law funding abortion can easily be passed, or maybe even “deemed” into existence.

Heck, if you get the right mix of progressives on the Supreme Court, they’ll hold that federal funding of abortion is a constitutional mandate.

rbj on March 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM

It makes me wish for the rebirth of Davey Crockett and Horatio Bunce.

single stack on March 19, 2010 at 8:05 AM

Or Daniel Boone, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Samuel Adams, Thomas Paine, well, in short: just about everyone who signed the Declaration of Independence & the Constitution.
Where is leadership in this country???
Americans are so hungry for a good leader.

Badger40 on March 19, 2010 at 8:54 AM

republicans will be reduced to arguing that they can administer the program better than the democrats.

Skandia Recluse on March 19, 2010 at 8:52 AM

Yup.
Bcs no one ever really talks about getting rid of Social Security & Medicaire/caid.
Which they should.
Govt should not be involved in welfare entitlement programs or pensions.

Badger40 on March 19, 2010 at 8:55 AM

Calrissian eventually decided to fight back.

Bishop on March 19, 2010 at 8:57 AM

Wow.

FRONT PAGE STUFF ED!

Doc, you continue to amaze me with your ability to communicate and illustrate the truth. Well done!

JusDreamin on March 19, 2010 at 9:00 AM

Bcs no one ever really talks about getting rid of Social Security & Medicaire/caid.

Badger40 on March 19, 2010 at 8:55 AM

Which is a huge strike against us. Because Republicans make some great arguments against Obamacare, but many liberals just look to history and say “well, plenty of people opposed ____ social welfare program when it was proposed, and almost everyone is OK with it now.” They assume the same thing will happen with Obamacare, and the sad thing is they’re probably right. So they dismiss the Republican arguments.

David Shane on March 19, 2010 at 9:02 AM

Saddens me that my grandfather left Russia as a teen to escape the Bolshevik Revolution, only to have his grandchildren have to fight their own similar revolution here in America.

pjean on March 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM

I deem it necessary to resist this government in any ethical, moral and legal way I can.

chemman on March 19, 2010 at 9:07 AM

It’s even worse because no one in this administration or in the upper reaches in Congress, has ever worked in the trenches of the federal government. They have a 30,000 foot view of how the government works.

Think about it – what general or admiral hasn’t led a small group of soldiers or sailors? They work their way up and they know the issues Lieutenants and Ensigns face when the carry out orders from above.

The CEO of McDonald’s, worked at a McDonald’s.

We have three leaders charged with health care reform, who have no experience working in the trenches of government. None.

Being a lawyer, fund raising, looking at PowerPoint slides and getting dog and pony show briefings, doesn’t make up for the fact that Obama, Pelosi and Reid have no idea what it is they are doing.

NoDonkey on March 19, 2010 at 9:11 AM

I’ve lost track of the number of people who tell me that they are entitled to their social security checks, because FDR promised them.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 9:14 AM

Massive government breeds massive corruption through its very nature

Yet even people who call themselves conservative, when they see something happening that they don’t like, reflexively call for more govt regulation. Even when the failure of govt regulation is what caused the problem they are complaining about.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 9:17 AM

Saddens me that my grandfather left Russia as a teen to escape the Bolshevik Revolution, only to have his grandchildren have to fight their own similar revolution here in America.

pjean on March 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM

Every generation will have to fight this fight. The reason why things are so dire, is that the last several generations decided not to fight and allowed themselves to be co-opted.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM

We have three leaders charged with health care reform, who have no experience working in the trenches of government. None.

NoDonkey on March 19, 2010 at 9:11 AM

They have no experience in working in the trenches of any business as well. The vast majority of them when straight from college to the state house, and have worked their way up from there.

Something needs to be done to eliminate politician as a career path.

Maybe something like raising the age of eligibility to something close to the normal retirement age. Or instituting a strict term limit on the number of years anyone can serve in any elected office. Whether it’s dog catcher or president, years in service count against your lifetime total. 15, 20 years, then you have to go do something usefull with the rest of your life.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 9:24 AM

Eloquent and to the point as always, keep it up Doc.

Daveyardbird on March 19, 2010 at 9:32 AM

@Mark,
I’ve lost track of the number of people who tell me that they are entitled to their social security checks, because FDR promised them

But that is the ingenious nature of the Ponzi scheme that is Social Security and Medicare… even when people do realize that they are in a Ponzi scheme, they want “their money” back!! and the only way they can get it back is for new suckers..ahem.. investors to join in the Ponzi scheme.

You dont need to appreciate the “greatness” of Social Security to support it – as long as you have zero knowledge of basic economics, very little knowledge of the way government “works”, and a sense of entitlement, you are going to want Social Security to continue for ever and ever

nagee76 on March 19, 2010 at 9:36 AM

“I’ve lost track of the number of people who tell me that they are entitled to their social security checks, because FDR promised them”.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 9:14 AM

No, they’re entitled to them because they paid into the system for years.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM

No, they’re entitled to them because they paid into the system for years.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM

THIS kind of mentality is what’s wrong.

Over a lifetime, vast majorities of Social Security recipients take more than they have paid into the system over their working lives.

When you go to Disney and buy a single ride ticket, do they let you ride free for the next 10 years?

If people actually received from Social Security what they and their employers paid in to the system, their checks would be shut off well before they died. That’s especially true with today’s increased lifespans.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what makes Social Security (and soon to be health care) a Ponzi scheme.

Sean Bannion on March 19, 2010 at 9:56 AM

No government program is a solution to anything.

Really? None of them solve anything? Does this include police and fire?

I assume it excludes the military since you mention them in a positive light only one paragraph away.

TheUnrepentantGeek on March 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM

“THIS kind of mentality is what’s wrong.
Over a lifetime, vast majorities of Social Security recipients take more than they have paid into the system over their working lives”.
Sean Bannion on March 19, 2010 at 9:56 AM

I didn’t say I agreed with the Social Security system. It isn’t voluntary and people should at least be able to get back what they paid into it with interest.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 10:17 AM

I find your lack of faith… disturbing.-Darth Obama

The Monster on March 19, 2010 at 10:17 AM

No, they’re entitled to them because they paid into the system for years.

No, they are’nt – and guess what, money does not grow on trees. When people made payments for Social Security they were paying for the retirees of their generation.. not for their own pension.. no, there was no “lockbox” for them. there is no lockbox, now either.

When they retire, they have to hope that there are enough number of workers to fund their monthly Social Security checks – if there are nt enough number of workers, the Govt has two options

A. Print money out of thin air – wont that be fun ?

B. Raise taxes on workers to compensate for the shortfall – who for no direct fault of theirs have to suffer in order to keep the “promise” of FDR.

Social Security’s inherent fraudulence was my first step to becoming a conservative – i still dont forget the day i figured how FICA works.

It should be more appropriately called the F*** You Tax.. thats what it really does.

nagee76 on March 19, 2010 at 10:20 AM

Nothing short of a permanent physical occupation of a million people or more sitting on the steps of Congress daily will change anything. Every day millions of unemployed people should go to DC and protest this vast left wing attack on Democracy and the Constitution.

royzer on March 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM

It isn’t voluntary and people should at least be able to get back what they paid into it with interest.
A better solution would be for people to call their Representatives and demand that Social Security be made optional.

If you opt into SS, a lockbox will be created for you – no one would be allowed to raid from it. And it wont go into paying any one else’s retirement either. Once you retire, it can pay you back the whole amount with whatever interest was accumulated in the 30 odd years you worked..

That still leaves the question of how you will fund the people who are going to retire in the next few decades.

This would involve cutting the waste and spending in every single Govt program..starting with the big targets like Dept of Education, Medicare, and even Defense.. conservatives might not like the last part but a good faith effort has to be made to cut out as much Govt spending as possible.

But OZero is going in the opposite direction… hopefully all the Obamabots who voted for him are all happy now. what an epic disaster this guy has been and will be..

nagee76 on March 19, 2010 at 10:30 AM

You can see how the Federal Government has caused a generational conflict with the ill-considered SS system and its stewardship. They would love to have the people fight amongst themselves about this rather than have the attention turned towards them—where it really belongs.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM

What the heck can we do to STOP this insanity?

SC.Charlie on March 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM

they’re just as quick to bend rules and perpetrate fraud as any white-collar criminal.

The problem is that those rules are used to pass laws that put me in jail if I choose not to obey them.
Bill Gates can not put me in jail if I choose to use Open Office instead of Office 2007.
Plus, the robber baron/baroness can only succeed in the long run if he/she has the cover of politicians who pass laws or make regulations favoring the robbers baron/baroness. Witness a case in point: Archer Daniels Midland, sugar beet growers, sugar tariffs and high fructose corn syrup.

Amendment X on March 19, 2010 at 10:55 AM

Another point about SS just occured to me….the Government will use the generational SS conflict to gain support for their death panels.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 10:57 AM

No, they’re entitled to them because they paid into the system for years.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM

See what I mean.

So paying taxes entitles one to collect welfare?

And what about the slobs who have also been paying into the system for years, who won’t get a dime because the system is going bankrupt?

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 10:58 AM

What the heck can we do to STOP this insanity?

SC.Charlie on March 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM

As VBMax demonstrates, nothing.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 10:58 AM

No government program is a solution to anything.

Really? None of them solve anything? Does this include police and fire?

I assume it excludes the military since you mention them in a positive light only one paragraph away.

TheUnrepentantGeek on March 19, 2010 at 10:16 AM

Yes, really. The military and police and fire are not government programs but legitimate government functions.
More than happy to FIFY.

Amendment X on March 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM

“Massive government breeds massive corruption through its very nature”

Just voicing out loud a reccurring thought of late, if Gov’t were abolished, whom exactly would be left to corrupt? Think of every article you’ve read citing corruption, is there even one that did not include a Gov’t figure?

The longer I think about it the more it strikes me that increased Gov’t is increased corruption. Without Gov’t whom would you bribe, give kick-backs to, or provide junkets for?

Well, that’s just my $.02.

Archimedes on March 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM

It isn’t voluntary and people should at least be able to get back what they paid into it with interest.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 10:17 AM

Why? Do I get everything I paid in taxes back with interest? Why is SS different?
Why should I be forced to continue to support a system that will not benefit me, just because people who have already gotten back way more than they ever paid into it can continue to live off of other people?

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 11:00 AM

You can see how the Federal Government has caused a generational conflict with the ill-considered SS system and its stewardship.
Causing unnecessary and artificial dependence between generations on deeply personal issues like one’s retirement and health care is the eternal cause of the socialists. FDR was one of them and did his part to change the basic character of America.

LBJ, BHO are just following in his footsteps.

They would love to have the people fight amongst themselves about this rather than have the attention turned towards them—where it really belongs.

Its up to the people to realize this. they are not so hapless, are they?

A true conservative leader is desperately need to step up and start a national conversation on what it means to be an American.

nagee76 on March 19, 2010 at 11:01 AM

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM

It isn’t govt that is causing this conflict, it is the greed of those who want what they aren’t entitled to, that is causing the conflict.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 11:01 AM

The prez and his administration have created a monster. If HC passes, a larger chunk of the electorate will no longer believe that government has their consent or their interests in mind and will do everything possible to countermand whatever demands it makes.

AltTuning on March 19, 2010 at 11:02 AM

They would love to have the people fight amongst themselves about this rather than have the attention turned towards them—where it really belongs.

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 10:41 AM

I love the way the person who defends intergenerational theft, now complains about intergenerational conflict.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 11:03 AM

Reflecting growing opposition among states to the health care bill, Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter, a Republican, signed a measure Wednesday requiring the state attorney general to sue the federal government if residents are forced to buy health insurance. Similar legislation is pending in 37 other states.

From an Associated Press article

Thirty-seven states! The other 13 need to get on board, NOW!

SC.Charlie on March 19, 2010 at 11:08 AM

I love the way the person who defends intergenerational theft, now complains about intergenerational conflict.

MarkTheGreat on March 19, 2010 at 11:03 AM

So, MarkTheGreat, you want the Federal Government to get away with theft?

VBMax on March 19, 2010 at 11:12 AM

Comment pages: 1 2