Green Room

Democrat Massa Resigns – to Squeaker Pelosi’s Gain

posted at 8:47 pm on March 6, 2010 by

Alas, Squeaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Haight-Ashbury, 100%) just picked up a vote for ObamaCare. Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY, not yet rated) has announced his resignation from the House effective Monday, due to ethics charges (sexual harassment). On November 7th, 2009, Massa was one of the 39 Democrats who voted against the House ObamaCare bill; see this roll-call vote.

There are two paths forward:

  • Ultra, ultra-liberal New York Gov. David Paterson might appoint a replacement, if state law permits; Paterson would unquestionably appoint a liberal who will vote for ObamaCare, converting Massa’s Nay into a Yea — a big help to Pelosi.
  • If the law does not permit, or if Paterson doesn’t move quickly enough (being embroiled in his own ethics charges — bribery), then Pelosi still gains.

    There currently are only 432 members of the House, instead of the usual 435 (two resigned and one, Jack Murtha, dropped dead); to pass the Senate version of ObamaCare in the House the Democrats need an actual majority… which is 217, because 216 is only 50%.

    But with Massa’s resignation, that leaves only 431 members; and 216 is an actual majority (50.1%) of 431. Since Massa voted against ObamaCare, Pelosi needs one fewer vote from the same number of Yes-men… so she doesn’t even need to convert Massa from Nay to Yea.

Either way, Speaker Pelosi has picked up one net vote since yesterday. So it goes.

However, three other House members are embroiled in their own ethics charges: Reps. Charlie Rangel (D-NY, 100%), Maxine Waters (D-CA, 100%), and Laura Richardson (D-CA, 100%); and each of this lot actually voted for the House version of ObamaCare. Thus if any of them is forced to resign in the next month or so, that would make up for Massa. (If two or three of them leave, that would put even more pressure on the Speaker, of course.)

It’s up, it’s down, it’s a yo-yo.

Cross-posted on Big Lizards

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Ultra, ultra-liberal New York Gov. David Paterson might appoint a replacement, if state law permits;

The Constitution requires a special election for vacancies in the House:

When vacancies happen in the Representation from any state, the executive authority thereof shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies. (Article I, Section 2)

KSgop on March 6, 2010 at 9:01 PM

The disparity in how vacant House seats and Senate seats are filled is a travesty. The greatest failure of the 17th Amendment (other than the Amendment itself) is allowing a State to empower its executive to appoint a replacement – temporary or not. A person who hasn’t been elected by the People has no business casting votes in representation of them.

KSgop on March 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM

The disparity in how vacant House seats and Senate seats are filled is a travesty. The greatest failure of the 17th Amendment (other than the Amendment itself) is allowing a State to empower its executive to appoint a replacement – temporary or not. A person who hasn’t been elected by the People has no business casting votes in representation of them.

KSgop on March 6, 2010 at 9:06 PM

Before the 17th amendment, state legislatures appointed Senators.

So Senators weren’t elected by the people as a standard until the 17th amendment.

Your post contradicts itself a little bit.

But that is why there are such discrepencies between how some states fill vacant Senate seats, based on this text from the amendment itself:

When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.

The second part of that text does not exist in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 4. I can only assume that the authors of the 17th Amendment felt that leaving a Senate seat vacant should be avoided if at all possible, where House vacancies are irrelevant, which aligns with the original Constitutional requirements.

However before the 17th amendment, state legislatures filled a vacancy. Governors only filled a vacancy if the legislature was on recess, and even that appointment was only temporary until the legislature came back and named a replacement.

The 17th amendment completely stripped the Founding Fathers’ ideas out of the Constitution, eliminating the state legislatures’ role out of U.S. Senate culture.

The idea was to keep U.S. Senators accountable to the STATES, which is all but lost on us today, and look where we are today. Do you really think Virginia’s Democrat Senators Webb and Warner would be voting for Obama’s bullshit if they were accountable to the State Legislature of Virginia?

uknowmorethanme on March 6, 2010 at 10:14 PM

However, three other House members are embroiled in their own ethics charges: Reps. Charlie Rangel (D-NY, 100%), Maxine Waters (D-CA, 100%), and Laura Richardson (D-CA, 100%); and each of this lot actually voted for the House version of ObamaCare. Thus if any of them is forced to resign in the next month or so, that would make up for Massa. (If two or three of them leave, that would put even more pressure on the Speaker, of course.)

She would never dare anger the CBC by asking any of these three to resign. Cold Cash Jefferson was allowed to hold on until he was defeated in an election.

Wethal on March 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM

So I have a question, if the number of votes changes every-time one resigns, why not make them all resign so it takes no votes to win.

Something is very fishy with the logic that when one resigns the votes to passes changes.

Maybe you would like to research the truth on this.

tarpon on March 7, 2010 at 9:07 AM

….So I have a question, if the number of votes changes every-time one resigns, why not make them all resign so it takes no votes to win.

. If the post office can save billions of dollars by eliminating Saturday deliveries, imagine hom much money they can save by eliminating the other 5 days.

percysunshine on March 7, 2010 at 11:54 AM


HotAir — Politics, Culture, Media, 2017, Breaking News from a conservative viewpoint
Top Pick

This is totally amazing!

McConnell may not get his wish on health care vote

Taylor Millard Jun 25, 2017 7:31 PM
Top Pick

Senate leadership wants a vote this week, others say, “Negative, Ghost Rider.”

Helping others without the government.

“…the reality is the reality.”

These kiosks don’t make $15 per hour or need benefits

Going for the record

“We will answer them on the field”

Taking it to the limit

Sunday morning talking heads

Jazz Shaw Jun 25, 2017 8:01 AM

Health care and tweeting and Russia, oh my!

Will they stay or will they go?

I can’t imagine what I was thinking when I said that

Rocking the boat majorly

Big government never contracts. It only grows more powerful

It’s only a “ban” until it becomes inconvenient

The decline and fall of Obamacare and the AHCA

Jazz Shaw Jun 24, 2017 8:31 AM

This was all over before it began

Fixing crime in America is a complicated issue

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 8:31 PM

Cops alone won’t solve it.

Victim’s father was President Maduro’s supervisor back when he was a bus driver.

Democrats forgot all about the “era of good feelings”

“Bernie and Jane Sanders have lawyered up.”

“the Judiciary Committee is examining the circumstances surrounding the removal of James Comey.”

Winning isn’t everything. It is the only thing

Trump signs VA reform bill into law

John Sexton Jun 23, 2017 2:41 PM

“What happened was a national disgrace, and yet some of the employees involved in these scandals remained on the payrolls.”

A new era of something.

“…died suddenly in less than a week just after his return to the U.S.”

The shortsightedness of “Denounce and Preserve”

Taylor Millard Jun 23, 2017 12:11 PM

Pragmatism for the sake of pragmatism doesn’t always work.

Perhaps if you threw in a new car?

Gay marriages still growing, but not as fast

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 10:31 AM

More, but not as quickly.

Should’ve stuck with the pirate gig. It was working for him

The battle for the rubble of Raqqa is underway

Andrew Malcolm Jun 23, 2017 8:51 AM

Won’t be much left.

Your list of demands is a publicity stunt

“what happened that day was emblematic of a deeply troubling trend among progressives…”

“The jobs are still leaving. Nothing has stopped.”

Bad vendor. Bad! No cookie!

“The Corps is just starting to grapple with the issues the court has identified.”

“So you want me to sing my praises, is that what you’re saying?”

Why would we possibly want that?

“I mean he sold our country to The Russians.”