Green Room

Just in Case There Are Still Any Heterosexuals Reading Hot Air . . . .

posted at 8:55 pm on February 24, 2010 by

. . . maybe you’d like to check out Hannah Giles?

Cameras roll as Hannah confronts Max Blumenthal in the Marriott Hotel corridor during CPAC 2010, where not everything was about teh ghey.

Here we see Hot Air’s boss emeritus, Michelle Malkin, reacting gleefully after being introduced to a tall person standing to my left at the CPAC Bloggers Bash.

See more photos of (mostly) hetero conservative celebrities at the CPAC 2010 Bloggerazzi Photopalooza.

Recently in the Green Room:

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Much better, thanks.

Jeff2161 on February 24, 2010 at 9:16 PM

Why do people have to flaunt their sexuality?

MadisonConservative on February 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM

Why do people have to flaunt their sexuality?

MadisonConservative on February 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM

Because it is so hot!

Brian1972 on February 24, 2010 at 10:20 PM

I was a heterosexual female, until you introduced the faux-ho into the picture. Her and Lila Rose should have a show on Fox News together… the ratings would be through the roof.

RachDubya on February 24, 2010 at 11:00 PM

I wonder if their are any contributors to hot air who don’t agree with civil unions.

Wonder if any contributors to hot air will say I will not put any new laws on the books about the tiny homosexual minority and will not increase government in this way.

PrezHussein on February 25, 2010 at 12:02 AM

The funny thing about Hannah and Blumenthal, is if you go to any of the Big sites, there is video of Hannah telling Max he has a booger on his face and Max goes right ahead and picks his nose right then and there.

uknowmorethanme on February 25, 2010 at 1:05 AM

I wonder if their are any contributors to hot air who don’t agree with civil unions.

Wonder if any contributors to hot air will say I will not put any new laws on the books about the tiny homosexual minority and will not increase government in this way.

PrezHussein on February 25, 2010 at 12:02 AM

The one’s that really seem to have a problem with gays are either closeted homos themselves, or want gays burned at the stake.

Gays have over-played their hand, they’ve got their equal rights.

Now they want to redefine marriage, which is completely unecessary and irrelevant. The Gov’t shouldn’t be in the marriage sanctioning business anyways, considering “marriage” is strictly a religous ceremony.

If you put it to a vote via referendum for “marriage” it will fail every time, as history shows.

uknowmorethanme on February 25, 2010 at 1:09 AM

Tiny homosexuals? How tall, or should I say short, do they have to be to be categorized as tiny?

Blake on February 25, 2010 at 1:40 PM

Tiny homosexuals? How tall, or should I say short, do they have to be to be categorized as tiny?

Blake on February 25, 2010 at 1:40 PM

It’s not about height – it’s about size.

As in size of ego. Usually tiny, which explains the demand for attention which reminds everyone of a two-year-old looking for a snack before dinner.

platypus on February 25, 2010 at 2:51 PM

Shouldn’t the title include “or l*sbians”? Though I can still appreciate how beautiful both women are.

Esthier on February 25, 2010 at 4:26 PM

In the follow-up post we see Hannah Giles from the front and it’s revealed that she is a man and we are all invited to reappraise our sexuality.

aengus on February 25, 2010 at 5:52 PM

Why do people have to flaunt their sexuality?

MadisonConservative on February 24, 2010 at 9:31 PM

Exactly. It’s juvenile, vain, and indicative of the larger issue of a society in thrall to decadence (whether its from straights or gays).

illustro on February 27, 2010 at 10:53 AM