Newsweek: “Go to your room, voters!”

posted at 9:52 am on February 15, 2010 by

I started out my “adult” life, at least to about halfway through college, as a liberal.

But starting in high school, I had doubts; the Dems were a disaster on national security; the economy was falling apart; I started to have doubts that “giving everything to everyone” was anything more than a good campaign promise to people who didn’t think all that hard in the first place.

Those doubts culminated in looking furtively about the polling station in November of 1984 and pulling the lever for Ronald Reagan.  And then lying to my parents about it.  For the time being, anyway; I obviously stayed conservative; within two years, I was hosting a conservative talk show in the Twin Cities.

So here’s a question: was my political evolution, which was a  considered result of a whole lot of reading and thinking and discussion, a sign of growing up and finding myself when it came to my political worldview?

Or a sign that I was just incoherent?

The latter, claims Jacob Weisberg in a Newsweek article called “Why the Public Is to Blame for the Political Mess

In trying to explain our political paralysis, analysts cite President Obama’s tactical missteps, the obstinacy of congressional Republicans, rising partisanship in Washington, and the Senate filibuster, which has devolved into a super-majority threshold for important legislation. These are large factors to be sure, but that list neglects what may be the biggest culprit of all: the childishness, ignorance, and growing incoherence of the public at large.

That’s a fairly big thought, there.  We’ll come back to that.

Anybody who says you can’t have it both ways hasn’t been spending much time reading opinion polls lately. One year ago, 59 percent of the American public liked the economic stimulus plan, according to Gallup. A few months later, with the economy still deeply mired in recession, a majority of the same size said Obama was spending too much money on it. There’s nothing wrong with changing your mind, of course, but polls reflect something more troubling: a country that simultaneously demands and rejects action on unemployment, deficits, health care, and other problems.

They neglect one other things; polls don’t exist in a vacuum.

A year ago, “the public” was wracked with Bush fatigue.  With the full connivance of a media that was completely in the bag for Barack Obama (painting him as a centrist, for crying out loud), they had a brief fling with radical liberalism.  Then they saw the price tag, and the rot that would set in if Obama’s agenda passed, and changed their minds.

They may be demanding action – but not the action that Reid, Pelosi and Obama want to bring them.

Weisberg is half right. The public had a moment of immature incoherence.  It lasted through all of 2008.

We’ll see if people grow up by 2012.

Cross-posted at Shot In The Dark.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

Still trumpeting for that media bailout are we Newsweek?

uknowmorethanme on February 15, 2010 at 10:09 AM

The last time the public was called ungovernable like this, the President was Jimmy Carter.

Sekhmet on February 15, 2010 at 10:16 AM

I agree with him to an extent. His take is similar to that routine by George Carlin about how it’s not the politicians who suck, but rather the public. After all, where do these politicians emerge from if not the public?

This is not to say that all voters are like Peggy Joseph and supported Obama and the Dems because they expected them to pay for their gas and mortgage. But there are enough people out there who do view the government as their caretaker that it’s led us to the brink of insolvency.

It looks like there’s finally been a conservative awakening in this country and the elections in Virginia, New Jersey, and MassachusettEs give me hope. But we’ll see after the 2010 and 2012 if the public is willing to put its money where its mouth is(literally). We say we want the government to reign in spending and lower the debt. But are we will to give up entitlements, reduce our military, cut education, cut services, and yes, pay more in taxes in order to accomplish this? We’ll find out soon enough.

Doughboy on February 15, 2010 at 10:23 AM

The whole sequence is so predictable:

1. Voters reject radical leftwing political agenda;

2. Leftwing pundits throw a tantrum;

3. Leftwing pundits order the voters to sit in timeout.

Patronizing such as Weisberg’s gets very old, very quickly.

jwolf on February 15, 2010 at 10:24 AM

Weisberg should move to someplace with an electorate more to his liking. Perhaps, like Friedman, he’d prefer China’s “enlightened” despotism, or Europe’s faux democracies.

So long as he leaves, as he clearly hates America.

Crawford on February 15, 2010 at 10:38 AM

There’s another failure that is touched upon, but not developed by Mitch.

I started out my “adult” life, at least to about halfway through college, as a liberal.
But starting in high school, I had doubts…

The liberal machine has worked very hard for over 50 years to produce a strong majority of liberal high school and college graduates. In some ways they have succeeded in that there are a lot of people who make it out of school with bare basic education and expect someone else to take care of them.
But consider the current political climate where the liberal agenda and politicians are on life support. This was not supposed to happen. They figured the time was ripe, their guys were in place and their dream was about to come true. The liberals abandoned the slow, steady pace for an all-out grab. The people (who were expected to retain all of the liberal indoctrination from school) would cheer them on in their quest for socialism and power. They were wrong.
Instead of cheering, the majority of the people are rejecting the liberals. We live in the real world where economy, business and jobs depend more on conservative policies than liberal ones. We don’t want terrorists to have the same rights we do. We want our children and grandchildren to enjoy the same freedom we still have. We want to be responsible for ourselves and successful by our own efforts, not stuck in mediocrity by our government.
The bottom line is this: the liberals miscalculated the effects of the liberal education agenda and have damaged their movement badly. In other words, they have failed. Many people are having doubts about liberalism, some while still in school, more later in life. Will it make a difference? It already has. Hopefully the momentum will continue.

JohnTheBuilder on February 15, 2010 at 11:53 AM

Jacob hasn’t seen anything yet. Obamas fiscal, economic, and social policies are seeing their endgame in Greece as we speak. The whole concocted EU could unravel before the elections in November.

percysunshine on February 15, 2010 at 12:35 PM

Weisberg is half right. The public had a moment of immature incoherence. It lasted through all of 2008.

That sums it up. It was surreal witnessing the wholesale abdication of rational thought throughout the 2008 election cycle. Willful stupidity.

cheeflo on February 15, 2010 at 1:17 PM

The last time the public was called ungovernable like this, the President was Jimmy Carter.

Sekhmet on February 15, 2010 at 10:16 AM

And one of the times before that? King George…

Romeo13 on February 15, 2010 at 1:59 PM

When you ask these questions in isolation, you get majorities that say “yes”:
1. Should we cut taxes?
2. Should we spend more on [programs]?

These results would lead idiot journalists to conclude that Americans are stupid. But you haven’t actually tested it. Ask the following, and I’m sure majorities would answer “no”:
3. Should government increase spending and cut taxes at the same time?

The real question the pollsters should ask is:
4. Would you prefer that government spend more money on programs, at the cost of higher taxes, or would you prefer lower taxes and less spending?

joe_doufu on February 15, 2010 at 5:53 PM

Everybody wants the goodies, nobody wants to pay for them. And then our ‘leaders’ go and spend bookoo bucks on all the wrong stuff.

Simple as that.

Dark-Star on February 15, 2010 at 8:35 PM

JohnTheBuilder:

“There’s another failure that is touched upon, but not developed by Mitch. ”

I’ve actually developed that idea extensively on my blog over the past eight years. There’s only so much stuff I can cram into one post!

A lot of these threads – indoctrination, propaganda, the media, etc etc – bump into each other at many levels, you’re right. There’s no shortage of material out there for bloggers and alt-media people!

Mitch_Berg on February 17, 2010 at 12:20 PM