In the palm of her hand

posted at 2:21 pm on February 7, 2010 by
[ Tea Party ]   

Glancing at the title of an Andrew Sullivan post – “One Last Word” – linked at Memeorandum Saturday night, I knew it had to be about Sarah Palin’s Tea Party Nation keynote speech.

My guess was that he’d gotten busy yesterday, summoning his personal Palin demons and holding a tea party of his own with them. Considering the infernal depths of his Palin obsession, I wouldn’t have been surprised if it was his 10th post of the day on her. Nor would I have been surprised if it had been even more foully offensive, deluded, and craven than the most recent previous piece of his I happened to see excerpted, one in which he went on as usual about things he doesn’t understand and that only he and said demons take seriously regarding Palin and her infant son Trig.

I confess, however, that the title made me hope, just a little, that Sullivan had finally done the right thing: Take an extended, indefinite leave of absence, possibly involving intensive psychotherapy and spiritual counseling – leaving “One Last Word” as his farewell – but, no, as expected, the post turned out to be about Palin. Oddly enough, however, it was something that a Palin supporter might actually enjoy – assuming an ability to read between the lines of Sullivan’s obscene melodrama and paranoid bigotry.

Promising to assess Palin as a potential presidential candidate, Sullivan first stretches for familiar “conservatives = Nazis” tropes of the sort that the invocation of “Godwin’s Law” was once meant to banish from web conversation, among other things equating Palin’s criticism of Obama as commander-in-chief with the Hitlerian “stab in the back” attack on the post-World War I German left: Hitler accusing the German left of treason and losing the Great War = raising questions about Obama Administration detainee treatment policy. Put simply: In the Sulliverse, any criticism of the great and wonderful Ø’s war leadership = Nazism.

Sullivan then turns to the good stuff: an at least somewhat grounded analysis of Palin as potential presidential candidate:

…there is a huge constituency out there (rightly) outraged by Washington corruption and she now has the critical mantle of the rogue outsider; she can channel Christianism and fuse it with the slogans of phony “fiscal conservatism”; she will blame every lost job on Obama; and she will accuse him of betraying the troops and befriending America’s enemies. Behind her are the Cheneyites.

Above all, she is capable of generating a personality cult – much, much more so than Obama, because she can harness Christianism to her divine destiny. The power of this kind of appeal – of a charismatic, beautiful woman, an icon of the pro-life cause, persecuted by the evil elites, demonized by libruls, and commanding the biggest military on earth – should not in my view be under-estimated.

Know fear.

It might almost be worth translating the above paragraphs into sane, but I suspect that anyone who has read this far can play that game at home. Conservatives, and sufficiently numerous members of the American electorate for conservatives to win elections, have become rather adept at exegesis of this type. This ain’t complicated. These aren’t the historico-political allegories embedded in The Lord of the Rings or Revelation, and conservatives can fall back on nearly 50 years of practice, since “libruls” have been reflexively painting conservatives as “extremists,” and shouting “The end is near!” at least since the anti-Goldwater campaign of 1964 – when a single famous line of Goldwater’s, and the liberals’ own epochal political success, helped to fuse the terms “conservative” and “extremist” together in the liberal mind and Democrat playbook.

Sullivan’s fear-mongering, literal fear-mongering, itself seems a bit frightening in the larger context of politicized Palin hatred – it only takes a Sullivan with a gun to make this psychosis real – but too little he says in general makes enough sense for anything he says in particular to be taken very seriously. For the same reason, it may be too much to attribute balanced judgment to Sullivan regarding Palin’s political potential. Still, I think he’s right that Palinism has immense potential. But anyone can see that now.

We’re left to pray, perhaps to our “Christianist” God – why not? – that Sullivan and his followers keep to themselves with their pathetic emotionalism. It would be a shame if they hurt anyone, even themselves. Otherwise, people so wounded in spirit and intellect have little to offer and are not themselves much to be afraid of.

They don’t count for much, but their collective fear does smell a bit like victory for the taking…

* * *

One last note: “One Last Word” wasn’t a last word, at all, naturally. Today, Sullivan is “talking to the hand,” along with a circle of like-minded bloggers (if “minded” can ever be the right word with these people) about notes that Palin may have inked into her palm for the Q&A session at Tea Party Nation last night. I hope that the nutroots continue to push this absurdly and indicatively trivial line of attack, since it makes Palin look like just what she is – refreshingly human and informal, determined to get the job done – and incidentally reminds everyone about which leading politician (if “leading” can be used in this context) is truly reliant on external devices to express himself, word by wearisome word.

Furthermore, you can’t bring up this event without bringing up those three main points, on all of which Palin, the Tea Party, and conservatives have much more popular positions than the HuffPo and ThinkProgress and Daily Dish left. It’s free publicity for the Palin program every virtual second it’s discussed and re-transmitted.

If the pseudo-scandal becomes widely enough known, we may someday see crowds of everyday Americans inking such useful reminders – “energy,” “taxes,” “lift America’s spirits” – into their hands, and proudly waving them at Palin rallies, or photographing and t-shirting them. The first example I’ve seen of such spin-offs was linked at HotAir by commenter Emperor Norton, and is shown at the top of this post.

Like Sullivan’s frightwig of a commentary, what this micro-controversy says to me is that she’s got them in the palm of her hand, she’s crushing them, and there’s not much they seem able to do about it. They can’t help it. The more they struggle, the worse it is for them. You almost have to wonder if they like it that way…

cross-posted at Zombie Contentions

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

The source of the hand image above is a post by a Freeper named cripplecreek in this thread right here.

Emperor Norton on February 7, 2010 at 2:32 PM

Thanks, Emperor – duly noted – all credit to cripplecreek.

CK MacLeod on February 7, 2010 at 2:42 PM

Excellent takedown, though I’m sorry that this miserable Marat-like character gets the attention he does.

rrpjr on February 7, 2010 at 3:14 PM

The only reason Sullivan still has a job is that AIDS related dementia is covered by the Americans With Disabilities Act and allowing him to spew this nonsense is “reasonable accommodation” of his disability.

SDN on February 7, 2010 at 3:52 PM

I read some comments on another site that Sarah had notes on her hand. These people are so strange. She had notes on a sheaf of papers that she carried on and off the stage. If she referred to her hands, I didn’t see it, even during the q&a afterward.

Kissmygrits on February 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM

Given Obama’s teleprompter addiction, including the embarrassing sixth grade classroom photo two weeks ago and his botching of the word ‘corpsman’ last week, any conservative asked on one of the non-Fox networks to debate Palin’s palm points definitely has a trove of ammunition to use against anyone on the left who wants to make this into a scandal.

jon1979 on February 7, 2010 at 4:12 PM

Can someone example why the loons use Christianism vice Christianity?

katiejane on February 8, 2010 at 1:06 PM

Kissmygrits on February 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM

I missed the last lunar-eclipse. It still happened.

The Race Card on February 8, 2010 at 1:10 PM

My only criticism of the divine Mrs. Sarah would be to have her, instead of “Hi, Mom!”, write “Your Ad Here”, instead.

Knott Buyinit on February 8, 2010 at 1:16 PM

Wow. Just wow. Howard Hughes was able to function for years even while descending into OCD. There are others who are mentally ill but able to function to a degree in society. For Andrew Sullivan to obsess with Sarah Palin over a trivial issue (5 words written on her palm) or a bizarre conspiracy theory has got to be an indication that somethin’ ain’t right up in Andy’s head. You would like to think that his friends and family would stage an intervention of some sort.

rbj on February 8, 2010 at 1:27 PM

Can someone example why the loons use Christianism vice Christianity?

katiejane on February 8, 2010 at 1:06 PM

its the ISM they want to promote. they want to tie christianity to things like racism, sexism, etc….

unseen on February 8, 2010 at 1:30 PM

good stuff dude.

Libs—-Talk to the hand!

ted c on February 8, 2010 at 1:32 PM

The Race Card on February 8, 2010 at 1:10 PM

Big difference. There was some significance in the eclipse. Writing on your hand? Only if you’re obsessed with destroying someone.

hawkdriver on February 8, 2010 at 1:33 PM

I don’t know why they’re making such a big deal out of the hand notes- I found pictures of both Andrea Mitchell and Barack Obama using handwritten notes.

Here’s Andrea right before a broadcast; and
here’s Barry campaigning for the Colts.

BKeyser on February 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM

Can someone example why the loons use Christianism vice Christianity?

katiejane on February 8, 2010 at 1:06 PM

Years ago, back when Sullivan still pretended to be on the right but around the same time that he began to reverse himself on the Iraq War and George Bush, he started using the term “Christianist” to denote people who, in Sullivan’s view, pretended to be followers of Jesus Christ but whose values and actions were un-Christian. Brief explanation here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianism

CK MacLeod on February 8, 2010 at 1:53 PM

The boys over at Hillbuzz are trying to make Palin’s Polarization a good thing.

Kafir on February 8, 2010 at 1:56 PM

Emperor Norton on February 7, 2010 at 2:32 PM

Love the “telepalmter” comment there. Hilarious.

cs89 on February 8, 2010 at 2:09 PM

Still maintaining that Sullivan is in the later stages of Syphilis eating his brain.

jukin on February 8, 2010 at 2:18 PM

Good lord! Obama can’t excuse himself to the john without a teleprompter, and they want to make an issue that she jotted five words into the palm of her hand???

But thanks for a bang-up merchandise idea, CK :)

S. Weasel on February 8, 2010 at 2:24 PM

The meter is bad but:

She’s got the liberal world
In her hand.
And she’s squeezin ‘em hard
In her hand.

Caststeel on February 8, 2010 at 2:27 PM

The next snuggie phenomenon……White board gloves!! I’m just thinkin!

DJ from MA on February 8, 2010 at 2:47 PM

All I can say is Obama must have notes written up his butt, ’cause that’s where his head has been for a year.

Dr. Charles G. Waugh on February 8, 2010 at 2:47 PM

She is the head of the Tea Party Movement, no wait, she’s irrelevant, no one went to see Palin because her popularity created too much of a crowd. She killed the movement by garnering national TPM attention on CSPAN. O the horror.

The TPM didn’t want her, so she hijacked it to be the leader, but they invited her anyway, where she admitted that they don’t need a leader.

She forced them to offer her $100,00 and then because she is so selfish she graciously gave it back in an attempt to hide the income she needs to keep Levi quiet with bribe money.

They charged too much, o wait, it was on CSPAN for free, never mind I said that, the tea party needs a leader, not Palin though, she has already destroyed the movement which is now too big not to have a National leader because of the growing numbers of participants which are inspired by Palin’s fighting spirit.

And besides she wrote on her hand. blah blah blah blah blah

Boehner 2012

Geochelone on February 8, 2010 at 2:54 PM

which who are inspired by Palin’s fighting spirit even though she is quitter.

Geochelone on February 8, 2010 at 2:58 PM

Here’s the problem(s)

Videos and pictures can be “photoshopped” we all know this.
Now were these pictures and Videos “photoshopped”?

From the Huffpo article

UPDATE #1: And, via ThinkProgress, the Video:

At 6 sec. mark of the of the “CNN Q and A with Sarah Palin” she raises her left hand (the with the so-called crib notes) to her left ear, you will notice there is nothing written on her hand.

Opps.

The very close up picture of her left hand with the notes “clear as day”.

What angle would the TV camera have to have been at to get that shot?

Directly over her left shoulder. Note, there is no TV camera over her left shoulder.

Perhaps it was cropped and cut from the video and then enlarged?

If that were the case the “crib notes” would not be clear.

Basic fact, a picture is a collection of pixels, there are only X number of pixels in a photo, any photo.

You cannot “add” pixels.

The only thing you can do with a crop n cut picture from a video is ENLARGE THE PIXELS!
AKA “Pixelation”

Bottom line the picture with the clear as day writing is a fake.

DSchoen on February 8, 2010 at 3:34 PM

What in the heck is “Revelations“? There is a book in the New Testament named “The Revelation of St. John the Divine”, which can properly be shortened to “Revelation”. Note that unlike many books of scripture, its title is in the singular, for it is considered neither a collection of smaller psalms or proverbs, nor chronicles of kings or judges, nor is it an epistle to a group of people such as the Hebrews.

“Revelation” does not have an “s” in it. If you add an “s” to its title, you betray a complete ignorance of what it says… especially its penultimate verse.

The Monster on February 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM

The Monster on February 8, 2010 at 4:37 PM

In my “ignorant” “Christianist”-influenced household, and in the church of my father and grandfather, the Book of Revelation was often referred to colloquially as “revelations,” an implicit reference to the multiple messages, judgments, and visions contained therein. References to the title in the plural form are frequently encountered – in the work of both believers and non-believers, though I happily concede that the singular is proper, and a better translation of the original Greek. Referring to it as Revelation has always sounded a bit pretentious to me – but that’s probably, as I said, reflective of my narrow upbringing not of correct or prevailing usage. My orthography was off and will shortly be corrected.

CK MacLeod on February 8, 2010 at 4:58 PM