Scott Brown to be seated today
posted at 7:24 am on February 4, 2010 by Cassy Fiano
[ Politicians ] printer-friendly
Scott Brown had initially scheduled his certification for February 11th. He’s now asked that it be moved up, and he’ll be seated in the Senate today.
U.S. Senator-elect Scott Brown, a Republican who won the seat held by late Edward M. Kennedy, will be certified today as winner of the Jan. 19 election so he can be sworn in later in the day.
Brown had been scheduled to be sworn in next week. His lawyer sent a letter to Massachusetts officials saying he wanted the election results to be certified “without delay” so he could enter the Senate today. When Brown takes his seat, he will end Senate Democrats’ 60-seat supermajority that has allowed them to overcome Republican stalling tactics on legislation.
“While Senator-elect Brown had tentatively planned to be sworn into office on Feb. 11, he has been advised that there are a number of votes scheduled prior to that date,” wrote his attorney, Daniel Winslow. “For that reason, he wants certification to occur immediately.”
Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick’s spokesman, Kyle Sullivan, said in a statement that officials will certify the election results this morning.
A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said Reid would be willing to comply with Brown’s wishes to move up his swearing-in ceremony.
“Once we have his certificate, there is no reason why he can’t be sworn in,” said Jim Manley, a spokesman for Reid.
And so, the Democrat super-majority will end as Brown will become the 41st vote in the Senate. This is causing Democrats to completely panic, for inexplicable reasons. All they need to pass health care is one Republican to lean their way (Olympia Snowe, anyone?) and they have their filibuster-proof vote again. Apparently, the Democrats in the Senate are so worthless that they can only get anything accomplished if they have a 60-vote majority. And even with that, they still have had a hard time getting legislation passed. It’s pretty pathetic.
Once he gets seated, we can begin to see what kind of fiscal conservative he really is. Right now, he’s the savior of the party, and unfortunately, when someone is put up on a pedestal like that they’re bound to fall eventually. Consider that he’s keeping some of Ted Kennedy’s staff on. Maybe it’ll be illegal immigration, maybe it’ll be something related to abortion, but I get the feeling that Scott Brown is bound to disappoint some people.
Cross-posted from Cassy’s blog. Stop by for more original commentary, or follow her on Twitter!










Blowback
Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.
Trackbacks/Pings
Trackback URL
Comments
When that happens let’s remember he’s still better than Senator Marcia.
Disturb the Universe on February 4, 2010 at 8:39 AM
As Obama is illustrating.
Disturb the Universe on February 4, 2010 at 8:42 AM
I can say ditto to that. Brown is no Ted Kennedy and is definitely not Marcia Coakley or Paul Kirk. Yes he will be rolled occasionally but think back 6 months ago what was representing Mass in the Senate.
Credo on February 4, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Brown has already said he’s against banning abortion and I agree completely with his position which is that abortion should be something between a woman, her family and her doctor. He’s said, he’s also against any federal funds for abortion including “grants” to Planned Parenthood Clinics.
PS: About his swearing in today. Where the heck has the GOP leadership been allowing Kirk to maintain his office and vote as the senator from Massachusetts, for more than two weeks after his tenure expired on January 19th????
erp on February 4, 2010 at 10:34 AM
Yes. Scott Brown is from Taxachusetts. If he stops ObamaCare, that’s the best we can hope for. That and against civilian criminal trials for unlawful enemy combatants.
rbj on February 4, 2010 at 11:53 AM
At least Brown is not a murderer like Turd Kennedy was
bill30097 on February 4, 2010 at 1:58 PM
I asked around and got a 2nd hand response that the GOP deliberately allowed it because “the Parlimentarian wanted to.” I would like people to get into the GOP leaderships’ faces about this, even though it’s a done deal. They know his vote was illegal and they have no satisfactory explanation why they allowed it.
YehuditTX on February 5, 2010 at 12:57 AM
What I would like to know is why Paul Kirk was allowed to continue within the Senate when his role was completed on January 19. The whole time that he was seated after that time he was acting illegally as far as the legislation is concerned. By rights any votes in which he participated after January 19 should be invalid.
maggieo on February 5, 2010 at 4:14 PM