Paul Krugman: The Brain of a Liberal

posted at 12:13 pm on January 22, 2010 by
[ Congress ]   

Paul Krugman, who writes an op-ed column in my local newspaper of record, the New York Times, also has a Times blog with the unintentionally funny title The Conscience of a Liberal. What’s so risible about that tile is that liberals have no conscience. They gave ample proof of this over the past year by responding with a stiff and unwavering middle finger to repeated requests from the opposition party to be counted and heard. One presumes the Democrats must have supposed the Capitol Building and White House were surrounded by two-way mirrors that hid their obscene gesture from the American populace.

However their behavior might be explained, earlier this week the American populace responded with a clarifying gesture of their own. Suddenly, a Senate majority so eager to exclude Republicans for a year because they had exactly the numbers needed to pass a gigantic piece of legislation the people did not want finds itself exposed to the rude light of day. They now speak in conciliatory terms of bipartisanship and the need to work with Republicans to make this needed reform a reality.

Which brings me back to Krugman. In his column in today’s Times, which like his blog is also pretty funny, he appeals to his political base thus:

A message to House Democrats: This is your moment of truth. You can do the right thing and pass the Senate health care bill. Or you can look for an easy way out, make excuses and fail the test of history.

Wow, talk about not getting it! Here’s a guy who apparently still believes that one-way mirror exists. His message is to House Democrats? Why not just address the House janitorial staff, which has at least as much political sway right now as Nancy Pelosi and her group of partisan thugs?

To the truly deluded, like Krugman, this is still the Democrats’ battle to win or lose. All they need to do is mollify those silly Republicans on the other side of the aisle — you know, pretend to be their best friend, invite them over after school, share your baseball cards with them. Then once you get something that the president can claim as his signature landmark legislation, you drop the pretense and go back to business as usual.

What Krugman and his ilk in the mainstream media don’t seem to grasp is that the definition of business as usual now has a different meaning. “There is,” to quote the Speaker of the House, “a new sheriff in town” — and it is the American people, who can’t really stomach either party but find the Republicans at least palatable. Which gives Republicans the decide edge. They don’t just think “they’re on a roll,” as Krugman writes. They hold the cards right now. They have the power to stick it to the majority party bigtime.

And they should. Sure, the nation needs health care reform; has for a long time. But now that Obama and his Democrat cronies have squandered a year on some half-baked effort to wrest away control of an enormous chunk of the American economy — all the while ignoring rising joblessness — why should Republicans lift a finger to help them? Instead, why not let the message sink in over this coming year, so all Americans can absorb and savor it? The Democrats and their beloved president screwed all of us. And now the screw has turned.

It might be tempting for the Republican leadership to want to negotiate, to win tort reform and insurance portability for their constituents, but Democrats had their chance to negotiate and we all know how that went down. So why throw them a bone now? I say, wait until the 2010 elections. Republicans should use their new-found voice to persuade their colleagues in Congress to start genuine efforts to jump-start the economy — by, for example, cutting corporate taxes and fighting Obama’s idiotic bank tax, which will only slow down lending and growth.

For now, the issue of health care reform can be relegated to a back burner — which is where most voters, according to the polls, have placed it anyway. Once Republicans get a few more congressional wins under their belt, they can begin work toward giving the American people the real health reform they deserve.

Follow me on Twitter or join me at Facebook. You can also reach me at howard.portnoy@gmail.com or by posting a comment below.

Click here to find out more!

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

hear hear!! Time for the Repubs to return the favor of the middle finger to the libs. Every time, every single time we compromise, the American people get screwed. Time for the Right to stand by our beliefs. Let the Dems compromise with US for a change. The American people will be happier in the end anyways. Freedom is NEVER a losing issue…government tyranny masked as “help” is a losing issue.

search4truth on January 22, 2010 at 1:11 PM

Thanks Howard, for summarizing. I was curious how this idiot would rationalize things but I couldn’t bear to click through and actually read his ravings.

PatMac on January 22, 2010 at 1:16 PM

I suspect that

who can’t really stomach either party but find the Republicans at least palatable.

should actually read, “who can’t really stomach either party but find the Republicans slightly less unpalatable.”

Which, in turn, reminds me of the old Libertarian conundrum — how can you motivate people to campaign hard to join an institution that you’d rather see less of? Anyone wanting to go to Washington from your town is going to want to do something with the power in Washington — chanting “small government, small government” at rallies isn’t going to change that.

cthulhu on January 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM

Krugman economics is like a using an empty sling shot. You can {spend and tax} pull back as far as you possibly can or want {government grows bigger}, release it, and it still won’t hit anything {private sector growth}. All what has happened is that taxes were increased to cover the spending of government interventions of picking the winners and losers. Can anybody name a Krugman macro-economic success story? Nope, because their isn’t any. Why did Enron fail? Wasn’t Krugman associated with Enron?

Krugman’s economic policies like his mentor John Maynard Keynes, are geared to grow government first and foremeost while weakening the private sector through higher taxation. The private sector in that weaken state only becomes weaker when a government growth ideology becomes the economic policy and the highest priority of congress.

787 billion stimulus has grown government, hence economic failure for the private sector once again.

Americannodash on January 22, 2010 at 2:10 PM

Oh they know! Like Nancy they have to pretend nothing’s happened or lose face. Can you imagine what the far left would do to their false Gods if they ever backed down.

jeanie on January 22, 2010 at 2:54 PM

Bummer. I love M. Portnoy’s Green Room contributions but with a title like that I was really hoping for something better. Like a Haiku or a salty limerick.

O-Care’s Death Rattle
The Brain of a Liberal
A Stone in Boxcar

livefreerdie on January 22, 2010 at 4:09 PM

livefreerdie: Seems like you took care of that task all by yourself. Nicely done!

Howard Portnoy on January 22, 2010 at 5:15 PM

“We need to send someone in to negotiate.”

Bruce Willis: Rat-a-tat-a-tat-a-tat. “Anybody else want to negotiate?”

Ozwitch on January 22, 2010 at 5:32 PM

You’d have done better! Now where’s my limerick?

livefreerdie on January 22, 2010 at 5:41 PM

Here’s goes nothing:

There once was a man named Obama
Much reviled by good folks in pajama(s).
We might cut him some slack
If he’d give us props back
Rather than make every case a big drama.

Howard Portnoy on January 22, 2010 at 7:03 PM