Green Room

“Stonewall” Holder and Barack Milhous Obama

posted at 5:15 am on January 13, 2010 by

In our previous episode, top politicos in the Ministry of Truth — I’m sorry, I meant the Department of Justice — were stonewalling requests by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (CRC) for documents and testimony to determine why Associate Attorney General Thomas Perrelli ordered career attorneys Christopher Coates and Christian Adams to drop the voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party (NBPP)… even though the government had already won the case by default. The NBPP never responded to the lawsuit, but possibly it had already been assured that it had a guardian angel in the Bobby Kennedy Building.

The Commission finally got so frustrated by the complete lack of cooperation by the Civil Rights Division of the DoJ that it fired off subpoenas, demanding answers to four dozen questions and the documents to support those answers. But Justice continued to waffle, finding one excuse after another not to produce any paperwork or even respond directly. At the same time, in a burst of petulance, the nomenklatura at Justice banished Coates himself to the far-away country of North Carolina.

Thank goodness we now have an incorruptable president and attorney general who would never, ever politicize the Department of Justice.

But that was then; this is now, and at last, la Casa Blanca has formally responded: All the president’s men categorically reject the insolent idea that the Executive has to answer to anyone at all… not even to the congressional commission charged under statute (the Civil Rights Act of 1957) with the mission “To investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices”:

The Justice Department refused Tuesday to turn over most of the information and documents sought by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights explaining why a civil complaint was dismissed against members of the New Black Panther Party who disrupted a Philadelphia polling place in the November 2008 elections.

In a 38-page response, the department objected — except for a few court records, letters and procedural documents — to “each and every” question and document request submitted by the commission, saying the subpoenas violated existing executive orders, privacy and privilege concerns, and were burdensome, vague and ambiguous.

The lengthy response, a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times, also said the requested information and documents were protected by the attorney-client privilege or were not subject to disclosure because they included attorney or law enforcement work products.

The department also refused to release any information about an investigation of the New Black Panther Party case by its office of professional responsibility, saying the ongoing review was privileged information or was covered by the Privacy Act.

To slice it down to the bone, Attorney General Eric Holder is telling Congress to go flap somewhere else.

Now I would heartily agree with such a sentiment — were we talking about senators and representatives horning in on foreign policy or the president’s warfighting powers. The Constitution leaves those up to the Executive, by and large. But this isn’t a case of national security: I scent the strong, smoky whiff of collusion and corruption in ObamaLand: The White House is covering up its own complicity; it should be declared an unindicted co-conspirator in voter intimidation alongside the NBPP.

My personal belief is that Holder (to a very large extent) and Barack H. Obama (to a somewhat lesser) actively support the Black Panthers’ program of intimidating and frightening elderly white voters away from the polls. Why would Democrats in general support such a scheme? That’s easy; they believe race-war is the health of the party.

They know that blacks will vote 95% for the Democrats, but they’re pretty sure that white senior citizens, businessmen, and military veterans will vote strongly for the GOP. So the Democrats have decided it’s in their interest to suppress the latter votes “by any means necessary,” even buddying up with a racist organization such as the NBPP or ACORN — or openly discarding military ballots during the election, as we saw in 2000.

(Sidebar: One of the Democrats’ most narcissistic crimes against America is the ruination of the word “racism” via tendentious redefinition; the term is now so tainted by false accusation and political manipulation that the word itself has lost all meaning. If George Orwell is right, when the word goes, the concept itself soon follows into oblivion. Now that “racism” means nothing, I wonder what word we can use tomorrow to describe the Klan, skinhead “Nazis,” and what was done to James Byrd, jr.?)

Some, like Michael Barone, argue that Republicans need a positive plan for action in 2010, not just their status as “not the Democrats.” Others (e.g. Paul Mirengoff of Power Line) believe a “contract with America”-type agenda might just get in the way, turning off Independents and moderate Republicans who may disagree with conservatives about important elements.

But virtually everybody would agree that campaigning against corruption and thuggishness — clearly defined, undeniable, inexcusable, and squalid — has nothing but upside for the GOP. After all, liberal Democrats have already painted themselves into a hole; they have preened with unendurable pomposity and condescension, congratulating themselves on their own superior moral code, for three years now; and that’s long enough to own their own policies.

Now hypocrisy — that seemingly venial sin that Americans hate almost worse than murder, treachery, and treason — looms over the incumbents’ heads like the Sword of Damocles.

Let’s find a pair of scissors sharp enough to slice a strand of horsehair. This particular sword is two-edged; but in this case, both edges cut against the supermajority.

Cross-posted on Big Lizards

Recently in the Green Room:



Trackback URL


Just schocked that there is gambling at Rick’s Cafe. Schocked, I say!

EliTheBean on January 13, 2010 at 6:31 AM

Thanks for keeping us updated on this.

Cylor on January 13, 2010 at 7:27 AM

But this isn’t a case of national security

Although I know what you reference here as to Executive powers, this statement is really at the heart of the matter. “uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic”, domestic being my argument’s keyword in the oath that all military personel, federally elected government officials, and various other appointees take upon swearing in. The NBPP’s behaviour defines them as an enemy of the Republic just as ACORN’s does. Not that these are the only enemies residing in the US but certainly they are worthy of oath enforcement by those that took the oath.

Robert17 on January 13, 2010 at 7:56 AM

The old folks don’t stand a chance. O won’t let them vote and kills them off with death panels. Sarc aside, escort people to the polls or go in groups if you have to, request an absentee ballot or go to the court house to vote, but vote. It’s our only voice.

Kissmygrits on January 13, 2010 at 9:30 AM

I’m delighted that there is someone else who thinks that the president Obama most closely resembles is Nixon, who would have taken over in just the same way as Obama if he’d had the media and the Soros Billionaire Club support Obama enjoys.

The cult of personality is alive and well.

erp on January 13, 2010 at 10:57 AM

Kissmygrits, you are so right. The polls aren’t safe in many areas. Even here in our little Florida town, we’ve been voting at the county court house instead of our town hall. Less chance of chicanery there.

erp on January 13, 2010 at 10:59 AM