Once more, with feeling: the Obama betrayal

posted at 7:39 am on January 9, 2010 by
[ Healthcare ]   

The Naked Emperor video of Obama’s repeated promise to “put it all on C-SPAN” is the perfect gotcha, capturing the candidate in flagrante not once but over and over. But its damning effects go deeper than proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that all his promises have an expiration date.

The video is a stark reminder to Obama devotees of what they voted for and what they got in its place. It has the power to arouse bitterness like an old love letter, written in the early stages of a romance before the manipulation and two-timing began. It is bound to make his supporters feel used.

Most damning are the pledges of transparency made in front of live crowds. When he says, in all apparent earnestness:

. . . not negotiating behind closed doors but bringing all parties together and broadcasting those negotiations on C-SPAN so the American people can see what the choices are because part of what we have to do is enlist the American people in this process. . . .

the crowd loves it. It’s an applause line. Open government is an ideal people yearn for. Obama promises it because he knows it’s what they want to hear.

Some of them must be wondering now, what were they cheering for?

For Obama idealists, the reality is demoralizing. The crafting of healthcare reform legislation has been, and continues to be, as opaque a process as can be imagined. It’s been conducted behind closed doors. Votes are held in haste, in the middle of the night. With every iteration the bills grow by 1000 pages. Our elected representatives don’t bother to pretend they have read them. The drug and insurance industries, labor unions, AARP, the AMA, and more jockey for position and work the corrupt system for the best deal. Legislators bribe one another for their votes with taxpayer money. And all of this is done in the face of clear, strong opposition by the American people, who Obama pledged would be “enlisted in this process.”

Jim Geraghty puts if bluntly:

The campaign rhetoric that stirred the hearts of so many Democrats and independents (and a few Republicans), that offered something fantastic for every constituency and group, that tantalized so many skeptics with a smorgasbord of long-desired reforms — all of it was just a tool to get elected. Say what you have to say, promise what you have to promise, and we’ll worry about the details later.

Yes, hearts, more than minds, were stirred during the campaign. As the revelations continue to metastasize, those who placed their hopes in Obama will feel a betrayal that goes deeper politics.

Cross-posted here.

Blowback

Note from Hot Air management: This section is for comments from Hot Air's community of registered readers. Please don't assume that Hot Air management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment just because we let it stand. A reminder: Anyone who fails to comply with our terms of use may lose their posting privilege.

Trackbacks/Pings

Trackback URL

Comments

There’s an old country song with a line that goes…’I'd lie to you for your love’. Seems Zero has that down pat. He promises a lot of things that he can’t deliver on, except the part where he wants to remake Amerika and redistribute the wealth. That seems to be on the fast track.

Kissmygrits on January 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM

“I’ll still respect you in the morning” said Barry.

tpitman on January 9, 2010 at 10:48 AM

Your alliteration to the scene in ‘The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly’ is perfect…chuckle

I always knew that the guy playing the harmonica was a democrat.

percysunshine on January 9, 2010 at 11:49 AM

It’s the Leftist conundrum. They can’t get elected saying what and who they are. They MUST lie to gain power. Obama irresistably promised a way out of this: he promised rapturous leftism in such an artful form that, once elected, would continue to dazzle and stun and seduce until the work of the brave new world was completed and America was transformed.

But the Sun-God was only a shallow shyster, and the greasepaint dazzle has washed off with the first rains. Now we’re left with the Leftist underneath, and a droning, meager, academic one at that.

rrpjr on January 9, 2010 at 11:49 AM

When he promised that he would run a publicly funded campaign he was new and I believed him. Did I learn my lesson? Not really because when he promised to have the health care reform business done on CSPAN I wanted too badly to believe that such a thing could happen so I believed in spite of my growing mistrust. Now he says the buck stops with him. This I will believe when I see some action from the president that shows that he believes it. If he fires Janet Napolitano I’ll believe him. Otherwise it is just another in a growing string of Obama’s lies.
Sure politicians say things people want to hear. And situations change so they cannot rationally stick with an earlier position. That’s cool. But to repeatedly make popular sounding statements without out ever having had any intention of carrying thru is not acceptable. If a politician reveals himself as an inveterate and manipulative liar, he should be removed from office at the first electoral opportunity. In the mean time decent people who are capable of understanding events should withdraw as much support as possible from the social deviant.

snaggletoothie on January 9, 2010 at 11:52 AM

Yes, hearts, more than minds, were stirred during the campaign. As the revelations continue to metastasize, those who placed their hopes in Obama will feel a betrayal that goes deeper politics.

Were that this was true — no matter what Barack Obama does over the next three years, you can be sure he’s got a core 40 percent that will vote for him in the 2012 election, either due to outright desire for the party in power to retain power, gullibility in swallowing the Dems’ talking points in falling for the demonization of whomever turns out to be the ’12 GOP candidate, or even race card fears coupled with their own lingering guilt.

A 60-40 victory by whomever ends up as Obama’s opponent would be a major rout of 1972/1984 proportions, but remember it was hard to get a lot of swing voters to come over to Reagan in 1980 until the last 10 days of the campaign, despite all of Carter’s screw-ups (and of course, Reagan also had to deal with the John Anderson third party candidacy, which was designed by petulant Republican moderates and pumped up by the big media to basically keep Reagan out of the White House more than it ever was to get Anderson elected. Look for something similar in 2012, especially if Palin enters and wins the Republican primary).

jon1979 on January 9, 2010 at 12:16 PM

Redstate has this video up by a Huffpo blogger attacking Zero — yea, he’s ticked for different reasons than conservatives about Oslamacare but still….

GnuBreed on January 9, 2010 at 12:47 PM

Every time someone defends Obama in a comment thread anywhere someone should post that video there. No need to say anything, just post it.

YehuditTX on January 9, 2010 at 4:50 PM

Yes, watch that video. It will make your blood boil.

Pundette on January 9, 2010 at 7:32 PM