Feminist: Husbands and fathers are “useless hunks of flesh”
posted at 9:54 pm on December 18, 2009 by Cassy Fiano
On my Twitter feed I came across this article, from a woman explaining why she was late for work. Turns out she is, somehow, the only person responsible for rounding up the kids in the morning:
So where the f*ck is her husband, who presumably sired the kids in question?
Women of the world: it’s time to leave those useless hunks of flesh called “husbands” and “fathers” who feed off your labour while you earn 70 per cent of their wages.
And by the way: don’t forget to leave them custody. Leave your guilt at the door. The kids will work out fine. Your husband will have to make sure of that, just like you would if you were the sucker. Don’t be.
After all, men earn more money. They can look after the kids better. Let them.
Just so you know, this was listed as one of the editor’s favorites on the site for this week. While several commenters condemned this article, there were just as many who applauded it. Apparently, calling men “useless hunks of flesh” is perfectly fine in the feminist world. Can you just imagine the outrage if some male blogger called women nothing but useless hunks of flesh?
And hey, ladies, you can feel better now. Since all men are just lazy slobs who do nothing but mooch off of you, and you’re chained to your house because of your kids, you know officially have permission to leave it all behind and devote yourself to nothing but work and time with your womyn. Responsibility? Loving your children? Who needs that?
It’s really pathetic that so many feminists keep perpetuating this hatred towards men. It’s just as sexist as the misogyny that they claim to be railing against, yet to them, it’s allowable because of the so-called “partiarchy”. Calling all men useless hunks of flesh is OK, but calling a girl a bitch is forbidden and sexist. It’s because of the imaginary male privilege that feminists just cannot stop thinking about. No matter how much progress they make, no matter how many abortions they succeed in convincing women to get, they’re never happy and their hatred towards men never diminishes. Feminists have completely forgotten about where their movement started, which simply sought equality between men and women. Now that it’s for the most part been accomplished, modern feminists still aren’t satisfied. They’re not content with equality. They want men to be forever inferior to women, because how could a man possibly be intelligent? How could he be hard-working, kind, loving, chivalrous? There are so many men in the world who work hard, love their families, and do everything they can to keep their wives and children happy, safe, and feeling loved. There are good men in the world, and there are good women. But you certainly don’t see society condemning women for the bad things they do — our culture today has a special spot reserved just for showing how stupid, lazy, violent, and worthless men are. Women, on the other hand, are usually depicted as capable, smart, and put-together. At worst, they’re portrayed as all of the above, yet maybe just too overstressed, and that covers all manner of ills.
But feminists never see that. To them, the patriarchy still reigns supreme somehow. And they still go on hating men, as if we were still in the bra-burning days of the 60s.
They look at men as useless hunks of flesh who are nothing but sperm donors for women. And yet they still can’t see that they’re the sexist ones now. They complain about the stereotype of man-hating harpies, yet they not only publish this kind of bile, they promote it as an editor’s choice. Maybe if they stopped trying so hard to act like man-hating harpies, there wouldn’t be so many people who see them as such.
It really must be exhausting after a while, spending your entire life feeling so much hatred towards half of the population.
Recently in the Green Room: